Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > Perl > Perl Misc > Unbelievable, Easy News trashes arbitrary message bodies from Perl groups

Reply
Thread Tools

Unbelievable, Easy News trashes arbitrary message bodies from Perl groups

 
 
sln@netherlands.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-03-2009
I forgot to tell you. The message headers are on your server. The body of the message
is no longer available. Is that something new, sort of latent body distribution in the Usenet
arena? Maybe comes 30 minutes later?

You knew the intent of my message. Unless there is some sort of unique "Header Servers" and
"Body Servers".

-me
----- Original Message -----
From: me
To: http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/(E-Mail Removed)
Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Ticket #825385] '[Sorry. This message is no longer available.]'


So let me get this straight.

I originate a post to/on EasyNews servers, it gets posted to Usenet but doesen't
hit your YOUR server for 30 minutes?

Thats not even possible. This is a some other problem.

I'm very unhappy with your service. I am looking into a different provider.

-me
----- Original Message -----
From: Support via RT
To: me
Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 1:57 PM
Subject: [Ticket #825385] '[Sorry. This message is no longer available.]'


Hello,

Posts normally take in the order of 30 minutes to appear on our servers,
though they do make it out to Usenet sooner than this. We have plans to
implement a posting-oriented server for people who value speed, but at
the moment, posts simply take a bit to appear. Please let us know if you
have any questions or concerns.


Easynews Support Team


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Nathan Keel
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-03-2009
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:

> I forgot to tell you. The message headers are on your server. The body
> of the message is no longer available. Is that something new, sort of
> latent body distribution in the Usenet arena? Maybe comes 30 minutes
> later?
>


Let me ask you, why in the world do you think all of the views of this
group care about your whining and complaints about your nntp provider?
Go away.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
sln@netherlands.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-03-2009
On Sun, 03 May 2009 15:04:48 -0700, Nathan Keel <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>
>> I forgot to tell you. The message headers are on your server. The body
>> of the message is no longer available. Is that something new, sort of
>> latent body distribution in the Usenet arena? Maybe comes 30 minutes
>> later?
>>

>
>Let me ask you, why in the world do you think all of the views of this
>group care about your whining and complaints about your nntp provider?
>Go away.


Hey, **** OFF ASSHOLE. GOT THAT SCUMBAG ??????????????????????????????????????

-sln
 
Reply With Quote
 
Nathan Keel
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-04-2009
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:

> On Sun, 03 May 2009 15:04:48 -0700, Nathan Keel <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>>
>>> I forgot to tell you. The message headers are on your server. The
>>> body of the message is no longer available. Is that something new,
>>> sort of latent body distribution in the Usenet arena? Maybe comes 30
>>> minutes later?
>>>

>>
>>Let me ask you, why in the world do you think all of the views of this
>>group care about your whining and complaints about your nntp provider?
>>Go away.

>
> Hey, **** OFF ASSHOLE. GOT THAT SCUMBAG
> ??????????????????????????????????????
>
> -sln


X-Complaints-To: (E-Mail Removed)

 
Reply With Quote
 
sln@netherlands.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-04-2009
On Sun, 03 May 2009 18:58:00 -0700, Nathan Keel <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 03 May 2009 15:04:48 -0700, Nathan Keel <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>>(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>>>
>>>> I forgot to tell you. The message headers are on your server. The
>>>> body of the message is no longer available. Is that something new,
>>>> sort of latent body distribution in the Usenet arena? Maybe comes 30
>>>> minutes later?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Let me ask you, why in the world do you think all of the views of this
>>>group care about your whining and complaints about your nntp provider?
>>>Go away.

>>
>> Hey, **** OFF ASSHOLE. GOT THAT SCUMBAG
>> ??????????????????????????????????????
>>
>> -sln

>
>X-Complaints-To: (E-Mail Removed)


I am cancelling EasyNews for thier rotten service.

On top of that, I am going to find you scumbag and knock you down and kick the **** out of you !!
Look for it

-sln
 
Reply With Quote
 
rabbits77
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-04-2009
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> On Sun, 03 May 2009 18:58:00 -0700, Nathan Keel <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 03 May 2009 15:04:48 -0700, Nathan Keel <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>
>>>> (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I forgot to tell you. The message headers are on your server. The
>>>>> body of the message is no longer available. Is that something new,
>>>>> sort of latent body distribution in the Usenet arena? Maybe comes 30
>>>>> minutes later?
>>>>>
>>>> Let me ask you, why in the world do you think all of the views of this
>>>> group care about your whining and complaints about your nntp provider?
>>>> Go away.
>>> Hey, **** OFF ASSHOLE. GOT THAT SCUMBAG
>>> ??????????????????????????????????????
>>>
>>> -sln

>> X-Complaints-To: (E-Mail Removed)

>
> I am cancelling EasyNews for thier rotten service.
>
> On top of that, I am going to find you scumbag and knock you down and kick the **** out of you !!
> Look for it

This exchange between "sln" and "Nathan Keel" has me laughing very hard
right
now! Two perl coders kicking the **** out of each other over some stupid
usenet bullshit is something I would pay money to see!
 
Reply With Quote
 
Nathan Keel
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-04-2009
rabbits77 wrote:

> (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>> On Sun, 03 May 2009 18:58:00 -0700, Nathan Keel <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>> (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 03 May 2009 15:04:48 -0700, Nathan Keel <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I forgot to tell you. The message headers are on your server. The
>>>>>> body of the message is no longer available. Is that something
>>>>>> new, sort of latent body distribution in the Usenet arena? Maybe
>>>>>> comes 30 minutes later?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Let me ask you, why in the world do you think all of the views of
>>>>> this group care about your whining and complaints about your nntp
>>>>> provider? Go away.
>>>> Hey, **** OFF ASSHOLE. GOT THAT SCUMBAG
>>>> ??????????????????????????????????????
>>>>
>>>> -sln
>>> X-Complaints-To: (E-Mail Removed)

>>
>> I am cancelling EasyNews for thier rotten service.
>>
>> On top of that, I am going to find you scumbag and knock you down and
>> kick the **** out of you !! Look for it

> This exchange between "sln" and "Nathan Keel" has me laughing very
> hard right
> now! Two perl coders kicking the **** out of each other over some
> stupid usenet bullshit is something I would pay money to see!


The guy is just an idiot and a low life. He's managed to **** off most
members on this group and a lot of people have blocked his messages
from being seen in their news readers. He made the threats, not me.
He's just an abusive ass clown and you can't take him seriously. And,
believe me, this guy threatening to "kick the **** out of me" is really
not a worry. Not that I don't secretly wish for the day that some
usenet troll actually got enough nerve to track me down and show up at
my home or work, because that would be something I'd also pay money to
see. No threats here, just a great outlet for some online frustration,
so I secretly hope it happens. I'll be sure to video tape it if it
does, but he's just a trash talking, abusive usenet troll.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Nathan Keel
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-04-2009
Sherm Pendley wrote:

> Nathan Keel <(E-Mail Removed)> writes:
>
>> The guy is just an idiot and a low life. He's managed to **** off
>> most members on this group

>
> I hate to break it to you Nathan, but you're doing that too. Feeding a
> troll is no better than being one.
>
> sherm--
>


I don't agree that there's always two to blame (at least not equally),
but that's just my view. The guy really stepped up his abuse the last
day and I've also filtered him out. At this point, I just let the
other poster know what was going on. Of course, it serves no purpose,
but just playing the silence game isn't going to make a different with
this particular troll. Damned if you do, damned if you don't, so I
have blocked him.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Nathan Keel
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-04-2009
Sherm Pendley wrote:

> Nathan Keel <(E-Mail Removed)> writes:
>
>> Sherm Pendley wrote:
>>
>>> Nathan Keel <(E-Mail Removed)> writes:
>>>
>>>> The guy is just an idiot and a low life. He's managed to **** off
>>>> most members on this group
>>>
>>> I hate to break it to you Nathan, but you're doing that too. Feeding
>>> a troll is no better than being one.

>>
>> I don't agree that there's always two to blame

>
> Okay, you can join sln in my killfile then. Been nice knowing you.
>
> *plonk*
>
> sherm--
>


And there is the perfect example of what I mean. People bitch about you
replying to other people, adding to the problem, and are just as
guilty, but feel the need to "killfile" you because you actually say
that thought outloud about not thinking the two are exactly equal.
Thus, you've called me a troll and killed filed me, for calling sln a
troll and killfiling him. Somehow, you doing exactly what I did makes
you the better person? Give me a break. The same rules apply to you,
and you needn't lose your head about it and act like you "need" to
killfile me as if I'm some problem, unless that's your way of saying
you have a problem. Guess what, I don't put up with your arrogant crap
anymore than I do his. If people replying to you is such a big threat
or problem, maybe you should find some other place to go besides
usenet.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Henry Law
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-04-2009
Nathan Keel wrote:
> you have a problem. Guess what, I don't put up with your arrogant crap
> anymore


Guess what, Mr Keel: Sherm didn't read what you wrote (that's what he
meant by "plonk", by the way) but the rest of us did. And I doubt we're
much better off from the experience.

--

Henry Law Manchester, England
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
python library for mail/news message headers & bodies? Arthur Divot Python 2 10-26-2010 11:49 PM
Re: Google trashes Linux application development. Mike Easter Computer Support 0 05-31-2009 06:36 AM
Firefox 2.0.0.1 trashes Java Console Mickey Segal Java 17 12-23-2006 03:23 PM
Visual Studio .Net trashes HTML code in ASP.Net projects Tom Wells ASP .Net 2 01-04-2005 04:27 PM
calling an arbitrary function w/ arbitrary arguments Honestmath C++ 5 12-13-2004 06:18 AM



Advertisments