«

>>>>> "AW" == Adam Worrall <worrall-> writes:

AW> What makes your group of people more authoritative than anyone
AW> else,

The fact that they are actually contributing positively to the group.

AW> right to carry the pretense that they are some how aloud to

"allowed"

AW> It's nothing short of bonified hypocrisy.

"bona fide"

Perhaps you should start a habit of stopping and taking a deep breath
before posting. You're not adding anything to the group, and you're
making an ass out of yourself in public.

Charlton


--
Charlton Wilbur

>>>>> "SB" == Stephan Bour <> writes:

SB> And fell right into my trap. You've become so predictable. I
SB> knew you'd go right for the user-history. And what does this
SB> history show? It displays exactly what is wrong with you and
SB> others like you in this group.

No, it shows that when you said "I was not here five years ago," you
were lying. I'm not sure how noticing that or demonstrating it in
public view means that Tad is at fault.

Go troll elsewhere; we're on to you.

Charlton




--
Charlton Wilbur

Quoth Sherm Pendley <>:
> Adam Worrall <worrall-> writes:
>
> Nonsense. It's not a question of authority, it's one of accuracy. If I

Please stop responding to trolls. It's getting annoying.

Thanks,

Ben

--
#!/bin/sh
quine="echo 'eval \$quine' >> \$0; echo quined"
eval $quine
# []

Ben Morrow <> writes:

> Quoth Sherm Pendley <>:
>> Adam Worrall <worrall-> writes:
>>
>> Nonsense. It's not a question of authority, it's one of accuracy. If I
>
> Please stop responding to trolls. It's getting annoying.

Actually, I don't think Adam began this as an intentional troll. He's
obviously confused, but I think that's genuine, not trolling. Call it
the triumph of hope over experience, if you will.

But you're right - Adam's argued himself into a corner at this point,
and can't bring himself to admit that he's wrong, no matter how many
times it's explained to him. Further attempts to help him understand
how this group works would probably be pointless and met with more of
the same kind of responses.

Sadly, some people just can't be helped.

sherm--

--
My blog: http://shermspace.blogspot.com
Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net

"Stephan Bour" <> wrote:
>http://groups.google.com/groups/prof...DXJvZE77WC-J4Q
>
>And fell right into my trap. You've become so predictable. I knew you'd go
>right for the user-history. And what does this history show? It displays
>exactly [...]

.... the contributions _YOU_ made to this group, none of which are of any
actual benefit to anyone.

I thought I plonked you a long time ago, maybe your entry expired. Well,
that's easy to fix.

jue

Adam Worrall <worrall-> wrote:
>It's nothing short of bonified hypocrisy.

Whatever. Go play in your sand box and leave daddy's computer alone.

*PLONK*

jue

Sherm Pendley wrote:
> Adam Worrall <worrall-> writes:
>
>> though. But this kill file business is just another indication of
>> going off the deep end - it's a personal utility, so please keep it
>> personal and talk about it over email, just as you've told others to
>> do for such things in the past.
>
> You don't know much about usenet, do you? First, you claim that it's a
> help desk, and now this...

Where do you get this? I _NEVER_ claimed it was a help desk. Not once.
Ever. I only ever said it _functioned_ like a certain type of one. I've
told you this over and over and so I have to now assume you are
purposely being dishonest by saying I said something I never said. Some
would consider this to be a form of lying.

> The meta-topic of NNTP client apps has traditionally been considered
> on-topic in all usenet groups, since everyone here is using such a
> client. The same is true of discussions about netiquette.

Yeah, it sure is easy to confuse a discussion about NNTP clients and one
about some egomaniac's kill file....

> With all due respect, I suggest that you put more time into learning
> what usenet *is*, before trying to change it into something else.

I know precisely what Usenet [sic] is and how it works and that you are
no authority. I also know exactly who and what you are: a lying sack of
**** who covers for his friends using any means necessary, even if it
means being utterly dishonest and deceptive.

- Adam

Sherm Pendley wrote:
> Ben Morrow <> writes:
>
>> Quoth Sherm Pendley <>:
>>> Adam Worrall <worrall-> writes:
>>>
>>> Nonsense. It's not a question of authority, it's one of accuracy. If I
>> Please stop responding to trolls. It's getting annoying.
>
> Actually, I don't think Adam began this as an intentional troll. He's
> obviously confused, but I think that's genuine, not trolling. Call it
> the triumph of hope over experience, if you will.

You people really are amazing. You think you can just pretend you are so
high above like this? That you think you know better, just like that?
When all you have been doing is repeated misquoting me and
misrepresenting what I said, over and over again, despite being
corrected, over and over?

> But you're right - Adam's argued himself into a corner at this point,

No, I've argued my way into pointlessness, as you just are so intend on
keeping your blinders on and keeping in line with the fantasy you've
created. Well done.

> and can't bring himself to admit that he's wrong,

I have no problem admitting I'm wrong when I genuinely am wrong, I
wasn't wrong here in reality, only in the way _you_ painted it, which
was royally inaccurate - you kept claiming I said something I _never_
once said, therefore you have absolutely no groups for claiming the win
here.

> no matter how many times it's explained to him.

Yet something can be explained to the likes of you 50 times over and you
are perfectly free to ignore it and pretend I said something I didn't,
and continue your points based on your own lie? Marvelous.

- Adam

Jürgen Exner wrote:
> Adam Worrall <worrall-> wrote:
>> It's nothing short of bonified hypocrisy.
>
> *PLONK*

What's really sad here is that you people think typing "PLONK" makes you
some how special... as if the rest of the world is suppose to give a
rats ass... as if any genuine person actually buys into this sort of
bull ****.

- Adam

Adam Worrall <> wrote:
>Jürgen Exner wrote:
>> Adam Worrall <worrall-> wrote:
>>> It's nothing short of bonified hypocrisy.
>>
>> *PLONK*
>
>What's really sad here is that you people think typing "PLONK" makes you
>some how special... as if the rest of the world is suppose to give a
>rats ass... as if any genuine person actually buys into this sort of
>bull ****.

Oh, now you are . If you weren't ashamed of
your name you wouldn't have to change our ID.
Ifany other proof was needed, you just delivered it on a silver plater.

jue