Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > Perl > Perl Misc > Hi Guys !

Reply
Thread Tools

Hi Guys !

 
 
rajesh
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-30-2006
i want to know about the recruitment in perl for 1 year !

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
darkmoo
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-30-2006
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:56:18 -0700, rajesh wrote:

> i want to know about the recruitment in perl for 1 year !


Do you have your own camel? Can't use company camel.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
rock
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-30-2006

Michele Dondi wrote:
> On 29 Aug 2006 22:56:18 -0700, "rajesh" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> >i want to know about the recruitment in perl for 1 year !

>
> And after 1 year you will not want to know about it any more?
>
>
> Michele
> --
> {$_=pack'B8'x25,unpack'A8'x32,$a^=sub{pop^pop}->(map substr
> (($a||=join'',map--$|x$_,(unpack'w',unpack'u','G^<R<Y]*YB='
> .'KYU;*EVH[.FHF2W+#"\Z*5TI/ER<Z`S(G.DZZ9OX0Z')=~/./g)x2,$_,
> 256),7,249);s/[^\w,]/ /g;$ \=/^J/?$/:"\r";print,redo}#JAPH,


 
Reply With Quote
 
Tad McClellan
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-30-2006
rajesh <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:


> i want to know about the recruitment in perl for 1 year !



42.3%


--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/(E-Mail Removed) Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas
 
Reply With Quote
 
rock
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-30-2006


> What this percentage means ? can u explain
>
> 42.3%
>
>
> --
> Tad McClellan SGML consulting
> (E-Mail Removed) Perl programming
> Fort Worth, Texas


 
Reply With Quote
 
usenet@DavidFilmer.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-30-2006
rock wrote:
> What this percentage means ? can u explain
>
> TM> 42.3%


It's the ratio of the cross-lateral amortization of the recruitment
node's impedance (but I think Tad's figure is a bit out of date - that
looks like June's number. The July figure (the most recent available)
is 42.1% - it dropped a little mainly due to reintermediated
facorization). But you probably wanted the induction-lateral
recruitment figure (not the prefactored cross-lateral); the
non-factored induction-lateral recruitment ratio is more like 44.81%
(as of July).

--
David Filmer (http://DavidFilmer.com)

 
Reply With Quote
 
Uri Guttman
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-30-2006
>>>>> "r" == rock <(E-Mail Removed)> writes:

>> What this percentage means ? can u explain
>>
>> 42.3%


it is the percentage of your brain cells that have long been dead.

do you have an actual perl question?

in any case read this group's guidelines that are posted
regularly. you can also find them by searching google groups.

uri

--
Uri Guttman ------ (E-Mail Removed) -------- http://www.stemsystems.com
--Perl Consulting, Stem Development, Systems Architecture, Design and Coding-
Search or Offer Perl Jobs ---------------------------- http://jobs.perl.org
 
Reply With Quote
 
A. Sinan Unur
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-30-2006
"rock" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in news:1156957254.244116.142240
@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

[ Please quote properly when you respond. Please do not quote signatures. ]

>> What this percentage means ? can u explain
>>
>> 42.3%


Well, frankly, Tad was being a tad imprecise. I think the 95% confidence
interval for the percentage is [39.4%, 44.3%].

Sinan














PS: If you want to be taken seriously, you might want to consider posting a
question that makes sense. I have read and re-read your original post many
times, and I cannot even begin to imagine being able to ascertain what you
are asking.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Tad McClellan
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-30-2006
(E-Mail Removed) <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> rock wrote:
>> What this percentage means ? can u explain
>>
>> TM> 42.3%

>
> It's the ratio of the cross-lateral amortization of the recruitment
> node's impedance



How did you know that?

Did you concentrate while holding your forehead against the monitor
or something? That's how I do it.


> (but I think Tad's figure is a bit out of date - that
> looks like June's number. The July figure (the most recent available)
> is 42.1% - it dropped a little mainly due to reintermediated
> facorization).



That's enough, Smarty Pants.


> But you probably wanted the induction-lateral
> recruitment figure (not the prefactored cross-lateral); the
> non-factored induction-lateral recruitment ratio is more like 44.81%
> (as of July).



Cool! I didn't know how to calculate that one. Thanks for the tip!


--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
(E-Mail Removed) Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas
 
Reply With Quote
 
usenet@DavidFilmer.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-30-2006
Tad McClellan wrote:

> Cool! I didn't know how to calculate that one. Thanks for the tip!


I should probably put a module up on CPAN. Acme::BullShit or something
like that.

--
David Filmer (http://DavidFilmer.com)

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
if you guys go non-hybrid blu-ray or hd-dvd.... you guys may be looking at laserdisc/sacd type sales. Doc Martian DVD Video 2 03-23-2006 06:01 PM
Hey guys...take a look at what these guys are doing... christo@studiochristopher.com Digital Photography 1 12-23-2004 12:40 AM
How to make good loking demos for new guys to computer =?Utf-8?B?emFycmFyIGF0aGFuZ2Fs?= Microsoft Certification 0 11-01-2004 04:16 AM
what do you guys do if Synopsys DC says it runs out of memory? walala VHDL 3 10-03-2003 10:41 AM
Re: Guys sorry if this is an old one Neonrh MCSE 1 07-03-2003 12:51 AM



Advertisments