«

hi,

Before, I use perl-Net-SMTP-Multipart-1.5-1

I modified Multipart.pm for this version :

http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=17936 for filename
# Keep only basename
$filename = $file;
$filename =~ s/^.*\/(.*?)/$1/;

and I add :
$self->datasend("From: ($arg{From})\n");

Now, I try with Net-SMTP-Multipart-1.5.4
I have problem with filename and From.

I modified 'From' as with version 1.5.1. It's ok.

But for filename ( FileAttach ), I have a problem.

sub FileAttach {
my $self = shift;
foreach my $file (@_) {
my $displayname;
if (ref($file) eq 'ARRAY') {
$displayname = $file->[0];
$file = $file->[1];
} else {
$displayname = $file;
}
....

Could you explain me what these lines mean?
if (ref($file) eq 'ARRAY') { # ref and ARRAY ?
$displayname = $file->[0]; # $file->[0] ?
$file = $file->[1]; # $file->[1] ?

Thank you
anne

ecureuil wrote:

> Could you explain me what these lines mean?

Yes, however they're well documented.

> if (ref($file) eq 'ARRAY') { # ref and ARRAY ?

perldoc -f ref

> $displayname = $file->[0]; # $file->[0] ?
> $file = $file->[1]; # $file->[1] ?

perldoc perlref Look for arrayref.

"J. Gleixner" <glex_no-> writes:
> ecureuil wrote:
> > Could you explain me what these lines mean?
>
> Yes, however they're well documented.

Albeit incorrectly or misleadingly.

> > if (ref($file) eq 'ARRAY') { # ref and ARRAY ?

the comment should be:

if (ref($file) eq 'ARRAY') { # file is an array ref?

There's no 'and' in the code anywhere.

> > $displayname = $file->[0]; # $file->[0] ?
> > $file = $file->[1]; # $file->[1] ?

If I *had* to document these at all, I'd say:

$displayname = $file->[0]; # show this name to the user
$file = $file->[1]; # use this name to get the real filename

The original comments imply to me that the references are being tested
somehow, which the code clearly doesn't support. This can increase
maintenance time, as the reader has to figure out whether or not to
believe the code or the comments.

As you point out, perlref (I prefer perlreftut for a nice gentle
intro) is sufficient to explain these two lines, at which point you
don't really need comments.

-=Eric

"Eric Schwartz" <> a écrit dans le message de news:
omain...

| The original comments imply to me that the references are being tested
| somehow, which the code clearly doesn't support. This can increase
| maintenance time, as the reader has to figure out whether or not to
| believe the code or the comments.
|
| As you point out, perlref (I prefer perlreftut for a nice gentle
| intro) is sufficient to explain these two lines, at which point you
| don't really need comments.

thank you.

I understand now...for array and ref!

I have the problem 'FROM' with this perl module : Net::SMTP::Multipart

I add :
$self->datasend("From: ($arg{From})\n");

else the mail has not 'FROM'. It's blank...

anne