«

David H. Adler <> trolled:
> On 2006-03-03, Tad McClellan <> wrote:
> > Tad McClellan <> trolled:

> s/augustmail.com/RReett.org/

Oh, isn't that cute. A unix expression.

> Is this the new fun on usenet for unpleasant people? Using the
> names of the people they're mindlessly ripping into?

Unpleasant people? You mean the small clique of anal trolls who
insist on telling others how to post?

Unpleasant? That's not the word I would use.

cordially, as always,

rm

>>>>> "UG" == Uri Guttman <> writes:

UG> Uri Guttman <> trolled:

>> responded to you and took your advice. he actually apologized for
>> not reading the guidelines, he is posting real code that we can
>> run and review. he is getting help from the cabal. so where do you

UG> Who is "we?" Where on earth did you get the idea that you speak for
UG> the small anal clique?

and who do you blather for? i see no groundswell of support behind you
trolling. show one other poster who backs you. too bad. you
lose. goodbye and try again elsewhere.

do you really think your trolling will do anything but waste bandwidth?
do you just want the attention and notoriety of being a troll?

>> fit in to this picture? nowhere it seems. so i say the cabal
>> should take a vote and decide to have tony soprano make you sleep
>> wid da fishes.

UG> Um, sorry to dissolve your illusions, but Tony Soprano is fiction.

UG> So is Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.

and so are you. all trolls are fictional.

uri

--
Uri Guttman ------ -------- http://www.stemsystems.com
--Perl Consulting, Stem Development, Systems Architecture, Design and Coding-
Search or Offer Perl Jobs ---------------------------- http://jobs.perl.org

I'm really getting confused as to whats happening here!

Uri Guttman <> trolled:
> >>>>> "UG" == Uri Guttman <> writes:
> UG> Uri Guttman <> trolled:

> UG> Who is "we?" Where on earth did you get the idea that you
> speak for the small anal clique?

> and who do you blather for? i see no groundswell of support behind
> you trolling. show one other poster who backs you. too bad. you
> lose. goodbye and try again elsewhere.

We don't claim to be speaking for anyone else. You do.

> do you really think your trolling will do anything but waste
> bandwidth? do you just want the attention and notoriety of being
> a troll?

It won't waste nearly as much bandwidth as your Nazi document. What
is it called, again? "Posting Guidelines"

> >> fit in to this picture? nowhere it seems. so i say the cabal
> >> should take a vote and decide to have tony soprano make you sleep
> >> wid da fishes.

> UG> Um, sorry to dissolve your illusions, but Tony Soprano is fiction.

> UG> So is Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.

> and so are you. all trolls are fictional.

And so, as we see, you are talking to yourself.

G'nite Wanda,

cordially, as always,

rm

trolled:

> I'm really getting confused as to whats happening here!

Your thread got hijacked by a bunch of anal bullies, who demand that
you follow their instructions on how to post. Separate the wheat
from the chaff.

cordially, as always,

rm

On 2006-03-03, David H Adler <> wrote:
> David H. Adler <> trolled:
>> On 2006-03-03, Tad McClellan <> wrote:
>> > Tad McClellan <> trolled:
>
>> s/augustmail.com/RReett.org/
>
> Oh, isn't that cute. A unix expression.

Actually, it was Perl. Oh, wait, this is a perl group - silly me, I
should have used something else.

>> Is this the new fun on usenet for unpleasant people? Using the
>> names of the people they're mindlessly ripping into?
>
> Unpleasant people? You mean the small clique of anal trolls who
> insist on telling others how to post?
>
> Unpleasant? That's not the word I would use.

I was avoiding "troll", but I see I shouldn't have bothered. It would be
so refreshing if someone acting like this would actually contribute to
the group, rather than bitching at those who do.

> cordially, as always,

Funny.

This ploy of responding to people using their own names strikes me as
terribly juvenile. As you clearly have no interest in having a
discussion, just complaining unthinkingly I'm done.

dha

--
David H. Adler - <> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
It tastes how green sounds. - subbes

At 2006-03-03 01:41PM, a sympatico.ca customer <> wrote:
> It won't waste nearly as much bandwidth as your Nazi document. What
> is it called, again? "Posting Guidelines"

And Godwin's Law strikes again: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_Law

--
Glenn Jackman
Ulterior Designer

Uri Guttman <> wrote:
> Uri Guttman <> trolled:


>> he is getting help from the cabal. so where do you
>
> Who is "we?"


Why, the cabal, who else?

You can't deny we exist, you are the one who trumpets our
existence for us. Been meaning to thank you for saving
us the effort of doing it ourselves.


> Where on earth did you get the idea that you speak for
> the small anal clique?


He was elected, ceremoniously inducted, duly annointed with
pixie dust, and given the secret handshake at our last meeting.

If you miss the meetings, then you don't get to vote!


--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas

"Ronald Matthews" <> wrote in message
news:l70Of.5602$.. .
> trolled:
>
>> I'm really getting confused as to whats happening here!
>
> Your thread got hijacked by a bunch of anal bullies, who demand that
> you follow their instructions on how to post. Separate the wheat
> from the chaff.
>

I've yet to see you offer any useful advice to anyone. Thrill us with your
Perl knowledge (which I doubt you have any of) instead of showing the world
your life is so meaningless you create free hotmail accounts to try and
pretend you're other people.

Besides, Keith Keller might be posting somewhere right now and you don't
even know it! The horror; the horror...

Matt

Glenn Jackman <> trolled:
> At 2006-03-03 01:41PM, a sympatico.ca customer <> wrote:
> > It won't waste nearly as much bandwidth as your Nazi document. What
> > is it called, again? "Posting Guidelines"

> And Godwin's Law strikes again: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_Law

Only anals recognize Godwin's "Law", as a law. For the rest of us,
Godwin's observation is not a "law" in any sense of the word. Those
who act like Nazis will be described as Nazis and this will not
change despite the existence of Godwin, or unimaginative little
****s like you.

Please stop posting to this newsgroup.

cordially, as always,

rm