@ wrote:
> I agree.
Gregory was not giving you an opinion, he was informing you of a fact.
Good of you to agree with the facts though.
> Here is mine:
> 2004-10-03 03:44:17.782 Server: Apache/1.3.29 (Unix)
Your server does not have mod_perl installed. See how easy that was?
> However, mine does have PHP, so it is very possible that the Apache is set
> up not to say anything about those added headers.
Possible? Sure, anything's possible - including little green men on
Mars. But I won't bet on that, or on your server having mod_perl and not
reporting it.
> So I am still looking for a script to test it.
Why? Just ask your hosting provider, and they'll tell you that you don't
have it.
So what's got your panties in a bunch over mod_perl? Between this series
of posts, and the other ones in the "PHP vs. Perl" thread, I highly
doubt you'll be able to make effective use of it anyway.
It's not a simple matter of just sprinkling your site with some sort of
"magic mod_perl dust" and making it go faster - for any chance at *real*
improvement, you have to write your scripts with mod_perl in mind, and
optimize them to take advantage of the persistent environment.
sherm--
--
Cocoa programming in Perl:
http://camelbones.sourceforge.net
Hire me! My resume:
http://www.dot-app.org