«

HI, this application im currently developing is already
737 lines long, 501 of which are all callbacks.

It is my understanding that there is a way to split
perl programs accross multiple files, but im not sure at what
point one should think about doing this. Also where would
be a good place to find out about doing this effectively?

<$_@_.%_> wrote in message
news:OtARb.12448$...
> HI, this application im currently developing is already
> 737 lines long, 501 of which are all callbacks.
>
> It is my understanding that there is a way to split
> perl programs accross multiple files, but im not sure at what
> point one should think about doing this.

when it is starting to bother you, the programmer/maintainer.

when you find that some parts oer more or less self-contained
and independent from other parts, and might be reusable in
other projects

when more than one person are working on different
parts of the program

how to do it, depends on how you want to split it
- .pm modules
- require
- do
- cat part1 part2 part2 > prog.pl
- use a Makefile to cat part1 part2 part2 > prog.pl
- probably many other ...

perldoc -f require
perldoc -f do
perldoc perlmod
perldoc perlmodlib


gnari

In article <OtARb.12448$>, <$_@_.%_> wrote:
:HI, this application im currently developing is already
:737 lines long, 501 of which are all callbacks.

:It is my understanding that there is a way to split
erl programs accross multiple files, but im not sure at what
oint one should think about doing this. Also where would
:be a good place to find out about doing this effectively?

There is a school of thought that programs should be at most one
screen-full. And that school of thought grew up in the days when
screens were often not more than 24 lines long.

The more usual perl way would be to split along functional lines.

By the way, if 501 lines are callbacks, could the program perhaps
be re-written to be table-driven ?

--
I don't know if there's destiny,
but there's a decision! -- Wim Wenders (WoD)

Just a quick message to say Thank You to: Walter Roberson and gnari
For their responces, much appreciated.