On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:20:17 -0500, Michael Black <> wrote:
>On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, tony cooper wrote:
>
>> The other day I stopped by a couple of Goodwill stores and noticed an
>> interesting use of a phone camera and maybe an app of some sort.
>>
>> Three guys with phones were going through the books and some other
>> shelves photographing title pages of books, and maybe using an app of
>> some sort, and choosing books to buy based on some return message they
>> received. It looked like they were photographing or scanning the ISBN
>> numbers. (They stopped when I moved closer and kinda concealed what
>> they were doing) They had a shopping cart half full of books.
>>
>They are leeches.
>
>The concept isn't new, all the people in the used business will pay
>attention to garage sales and book sales. But, they have to have skill,
>know what people will buy, know the value of an item.
>
>The barcode skimmers don't need to know anything about the value, or the
>item, they are just looking up a list. They don't even have to type in
>the numbers. They just rifle through the items until something rings a
>bell, indicating a high resale value.
An interesting viewpoint, but not one that I particularly agree with.
A line worker making iPads knows nothing about what makes an iPad
work, the value of an iPad, or the use for one. But, that worker is
contributing the skill he/she has to the process.
The result is a product that someone wants, knows what to do with, and
one that puts money in the pocket of the assembly contractor, Apple,
Apple employees, app developers, software developers and some end
users. Without that ignorant line worker, the product doesn't get to
market.
The picker in the Goodwill store is earning money and supporting
himself and his family. The money he earns is spent on food,
clothing, rent, and other essentials. It flows into the system.
If you discount the value of every employee or worker who has a
function in making or distributing a product that he or she is
ignorant of the value or end-use of, you discount the value of most
people in the workforce.
You discount the value of the typesetter, the press operator, the
bindery worker, the warehouseman, the shipping clerk, and the delivery
truck driver who don't read the books that they produce and bring to
market.
>Real book dealers are like anyone else, they go to the bookstores, they
>look at the books, they make a judgement.
I doubt if this is the prevailing practice. Most used book dealers
are small businesses in the number of employees. They can't be out
scouring other bookstores for inventory and manning their own stores
unless they increase their overhead by staffing their store to replace
them. They can't travel over a wide area because of the costs of road
trips. The picker system brings the books to them.
Rare book dealers may be an exception, but the average used book store
can't follow your model and remain in business.
>I can do it too, that book is
>overpriced, it's common, that book I haven't seen in 20 years, this book
>I've never seen before. I'll give this a home because I'm pretty
>certain nobody else coming by will be interested, but once the price
>goes up, I'll be more selective. I'm not reselling, but I certainly know
>the books.
You're a hobbyist, then. You don't depend on volume or a varied stock
of titles. Basically, you're a cherry-picker.
>This is the way the internet fails. It doesn't raise people up, it dumbs
>them down. Some collective mind lets them do things that they wouldn't
>ahve done before, but they havent' changed, they are relying on others to
>do the work.
>This is so common that only a fool would be worried that someone would
>copy them. But they have good reason to worry about Goodwill, since they
>are explotiting the cheap books and making a profit. Why doesn't Goodwill
>start doing the exact same thing, and then raise the prices accordingly,
>or sell them directly to buyers? The problem is, that if you start
>filtering the books at a used book sale or store, then there is less of a
>lure. If the good books are skimmed off before the sale, then I'm not
>going to get up early to go to it. If the prices are raised, to reflect
>"internet prices", then i wont' buy as much. It relies on people to come
>in and buy at the higher prices.
>
>Books are in an endless supply, and likely will continue that way for a
>long time (one can still buy records at garage sales). If book sales
>raise their prices for the barcode skimmers, then they risk ending up with
>too much stock at the end, something they don't want.
>
>These idiots aren't doing me a favor, I dont' want them blocking my way as
>they scan books. I have only comtempt for them, and have told them so. I
>want to go to used book sales for the adventure, to find books I've never
>seen before. If I wanted specific books, then I'd pay someone for that
>filtered selection, but I'd also be real careful knowing that idiots with
>barcode readers may be the source of such books.
So you're a dilettante that is annoyed when someone making their
living in the only way that may be available to them slows down your
cherry-picking.
>Someone pointed out that lots of books don't have a barcode. Which shoes
>the stupidity of all this. The barcode skimmers will go through that
>stack of computer books, hoping to win the jackpot, but there are endless
>books that I rarely or never see, that may be harder to resell, but might
>have a better price. Meanwhile, the used book sales feel they have to
>deal with the barcode skimmers, so they do the same thing, raising prices
>on the books with barcodes. Yet a year ago, at one sale, they were
>discarding a autiobiography by jazz singer Ethel Waters, something I've
>never seen before, surely of value to someone. That same sale, I paid a
>dollar for a an autobiography of Dorothy Day, the pacifist, it was the
>first time in 30 years that I'd seen a copy (and I paid more the first
>time). But the barcode skimmers will never notice, they are illiterate
>when it comes to the actual books. And so are the book sales, they know
>broadly what's valuable, they can price the latest Clive Cussler at a
>higher price than some generic fiction, but unless they pay attention over
>the years (ie volunteers stick around enough to be valuable) they won't
>know how uncommon that Dorothy Day book is, yet will price something
>higher "because the internet says so".
>
> Michael
--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida