«

* Supersleuth hackte in den Rechenknecht:
>
> ping 8.8.8.8 source GigabitEthernet0/0 100% success
>
> ping 8.8.8.8 source Vlan1 0% sucess
>
>
> What am I missing in my config to route Vlan1 to GigabitEthernet0/0
> (outside world)
>
> Config is posted in 1 of the previous in this chain

do:
sh ip route
sh vlan-switch
sh ip int brie

I suppose, that maybe your vlan-interface is down due to misconfiguration,
therefore it is not able to forward traffic.

luke
--
> Was ich gelernt habe, war Gier und Hinterlist!
Sie wurden Anwalt?
--Donald Duck in MM 7/2005 (Don Rosa)

On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:57:01 +0100, Marco Giuliani
<> wrote:

>On 21/02/2012 21:28, Supersleuth wrote:
>
>> ping 8.8.8.8 source GigabitEthernet0/0 100% success
>>
>> ping 8.8.8.8 source Vlan1 0% sucess
>>
>>
>> What am I missing in my config to route Vlan1 to GigabitEthernet0/0
>> (outside world)
>>
>> Config is posted in 1 of the previous in this chain
>
>It seems that your provider does not have a route to your inside subnet.
>
>your ISP
>x.x.172.113/30
>
>G0/0 x.x.172.114/30
>cisco 1941
>Vlan1 x.x.174.25/28
>
>LAN.....subnet x.x.174.16/28
>
>Your default route is 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.172.113
>and your ISP's router should have
>
>x.x.174.16 255.255.255.240 x.x.172.113.
>
>Anyway, you said that all was ok with draytek router:
>how we can explain this situation?
>
>Are you sure about your subnet assignment? Why you choose x.x.174.25/28
>ip address on vlan1? It is not first nor last subnet address.
>
>Regards.
>
>
>
>
>
sorry for the typo just realised it should be a /29 255.255.255.248
NOT /28


I have tried the setup with a draytechk,. netgear and a linksys all
work OK.

There is something to do with routing any traffic that hits the Vlan1
interface to the GigabitEthernet 0/0 interface WITHOIUT using NAT


If the cheaper routers can do trhis the 1941 must be able to

Supersleuth <> writes:
>I have tried the setup with a draytechk,. netgear and a linksys all
>work OK.

>There is something to do with routing any traffic that hits the Vlan1
>interface to the GigabitEthernet 0/0 interface WITHOIUT using NAT

>If the cheaper routers can do trhis the 1941 must be able to


As my previous post indicated to you, you must be having issues with the addon
HWIC-4ESW card you must have installed, and not routing in general.

If you moved your config to use both the Gigabit Ethernet layer-3
ports in the 1941 box, you'd probably work just fine.

I also gave you some troubleshooting commands to see what may be going
on with the HWIC-4ESW card talking (as have others).

It isn't the router, but something with the addon card that may be
doing you in.

On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:12:15 +0100, Lukas Schratz
<> wrote:

>* Supersleuth hackte in den Rechenknecht:
>>
>> ping 8.8.8.8 source GigabitEthernet0/0 100% success
>>
>> ping 8.8.8.8 source Vlan1 0% sucess
>>
>>
>> What am I missing in my config to route Vlan1 to GigabitEthernet0/0
>> (outside world)
>>
>> Config is posted in 1 of the previous in this chain
>
>do:
>sh ip route
>sh vlan-switch
>sh ip int brie
>
>I suppose, that maybe your vlan-interface is down due to misconfiguration,
>therefore it is not able to forward traffic.
>
>luke


After a week of several calls to the ISP support desk with them
telling me their service was fine ansd the probem must be in our CPE
This time i managed to get an ISP helpdesk engineer that aggreed to
login to our router and take a look


After half hour he called back and said he found an error in our
router config and he fixed it.

the service is now working

When i checked ther config he said he corrected with my original one
there was no difference.

I think he found an error in the ISP's routing and fixed it.
talking to other engineers they said this ISP will never admit any
problems with their systems


Thanks for all your help