Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > Ruby > Encoding error while installing rails on ruby 1.9.2

Reply
Thread Tools

Encoding error while installing rails on ruby 1.9.2

 
 
Bek Bek
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2010
Hello everybody,

I am making my first steps on Ruby on Rails. I have a very simple
question. When I am trying to install rails (as well as every gem) I am
getting this error:

ERROR: While executing gem ... (Encoding::ConverterNotFoundError)
code converter not found (UTF-16LE to IBM737)

My Operating System is Microsoft Windows XP and I have installed Ruby
1.9.2. With previous releases of Ruby (for example 1.8.7) everything is
fine and gems installed successfully. But in version 1.9.2, when i try
"gem install GEMNAME" in command prompt I get this error.

Thank you in advance
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Brian Candler
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2010
Please be more specific. Which *exact* version of ruby 1.9.2 did you
install, and where did you get it from? For example was it a Cygwin
package, the rubyinstaller package, some other pre-compiled package, or
did you build it yourself from source? In the latter case, what compiler
did you use, and what options did you configure it with?

Also, what output do you get from these commands?

ruby -v
ruby -e 'puts Encoding.find("locale")'
ruby -e 'puts $:'
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Bek Bek
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2010
I've installed "RubyInstaller 1.9.2-p0" from http://rubyinstaller.org/.
The output I get from the commands you asked me is:

ruvy -v:
ruby 1.9.2p0 (2010-08-1 [i386-mingw32]

ruby -e 'puts Encoding.find("locale")':
IBM737

ruby -e 'puts $:':
C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1
C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1/i386-msvcrt
C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/site_ruby
C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.9.1
C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.9.1/i386-msvcrt
C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby
C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/1.9.1
C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/1.9.1/i386-mingw32

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Luis Lavena
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2010
On Sep 14, 5:57*am, Bek Bek <bek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I am making my first steps on Ruby on Rails. I have a very simple
> question. When I am trying to install rails (as well as every gem) I am
> getting this error:
>
> ERROR: *While executing gem ... (Encoding::ConverterNotFoundError)
> * * code converter not found (UTF-16LE to IBM737)
>


Why is your terminal IBM737?

Can you change it with chcp to either 850 or 1251/1252?

It seems that IBM737 do not have a Unicode converter match from/to
UTF.

If that works, please let us know.

--
Luis Lavena
 
Reply With Quote
 
Bek Bek
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2010
I changed it to 850 and it worked!!
So that was the problem..
Thank you very much!

Luis Lavena wrote:
> On Sep 14, 5:57�am, Bek Bek <bek...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I am making my first steps on Ruby on Rails. I have a very simple
>> question. When I am trying to install rails (as well as every gem) I am
>> getting this error:
>>
>> ERROR: �While executing gem ... (Encoding::ConverterNotFoundError)
>> � � code converter not found (UTF-16LE to IBM737)
>>

>
> Why is your terminal IBM737?
>
> Can you change it with chcp to either 850 or 1251/1252?
>
> It seems that IBM737 do not have a Unicode converter match from/to
> UTF.
>
> If that works, please let us know.


--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Brian Candler
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2010
kostas Bek wrote:
> I changed it to 850 and it worked!!
> So that was the problem..


Or to give a different point of view: the problem is the fundamentally
flawed design of ruby 1.9, which means that:

(1) The same program, running on the same version of ruby and the same
operating system, will work fine on one system but crash on another.

(2) It is so complex that it is virtually impossible to build complete
test coverage to prevent this sort of problem happening.

Fortunately, there is an easy solution: use ruby 1.8.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Benoit Daloze
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2010
On 14 September 2010 14:53, Brian Candler <> wrote:
> kostas Bek wrote:
>> I changed it to 850 and it worked!!
>> So that was the problem..

>
> Or to give a different point of view: the problem is the fundamentally
> flawed design of ruby 1.9, which means that:
>
> (1) The same program, running on the same version of ruby and the same
> operating system, will work fine on one system but crash on another.
>
> (2) It is so complex that it is virtually impossible to build complete
> test coverage to prevent this sort of problem happening.
>
> Fortunately, there is an easy solution: use ruby 1.8.
> --


Well, that is rather pessimist.

AFAIK, with 1.8, he would just get unreadable characters in his
terminal, and would have to figure himself what to do to resolve it.
With 1.9, at least the error is shown and says the term's encoding is
not compatible.

But I agree, this kind of error just running `gem` is unexpected and
non user-friendly.
But he would anyway have to change one day to use other characters
than pure ASCII in his term.

P.S.: Why `gem` is trying to convert from UTF-16LE ?

 
Reply With Quote
 
Brian Candler
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2010
Benoit Daloze wrote:
> AFAIK, with 1.8, he would just get unreadable characters in his
> terminal


Given that the error messages from ruby are themselves readable, it's a
fair bet that IBM737 is at least ASCII-compatible.

I'm pretty sure that rubygems under 1.8 would just have worked. After
all, rubygems is a system utility. Its job is to fetch files and install
them in the right places. "Encodings" don't help it to do that job, but
they do make programs crash.

> P.S.: Why `gem` is trying to convert from UTF-16LE ?


I wondered that too.

But more importantly, why is the locale's default_encoding significant?
Is it reading files from the filesystem without specifying the locale
(or binary mode)? If so that's a "bug" in rubygems, but it's the
language which makes these bugs occur.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Luis Lavena
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2010
On Sep 14, 10:57*am, Brian Candler <b.cand...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Benoit Daloze wrote:
> > AFAIK, with 1.8, he would just get unreadable characters in his
> > terminal

>
> Given that the error messages from ruby are themselves readable, it's a
> fair bet that IBM737 is at least ASCII-compatible.
>


This is what Roger Pack asked on Ruby core about IBM737

> > P.S.: Why `gem` is trying to convert from UTF-16LE ?

>
> I wondered that too.
>
> But more importantly, why is the locale's default_encoding significant?
> Is it reading files from the filesystem without specifying the locale
> (or binary mode)? If so that's a "bug" in rubygems, but it's the
> language which makes these bugs occur.


Excellent question, seems to me that is trying to parse some gemspec
contents (my guess)

Complete output of "gem install xxx --debug -V" will be great to have
when chcp is set to 737

--
Luis Lavena
 
Reply With Quote
 
Bernard Kenik
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2010
Luis Lavena wrote:
> On Sep 14, 10:57�am, Brian Candler <b.cand...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Benoit Daloze wrote:
>> > AFAIK, with 1.8, he would just get unreadable characters in his
>> > terminal

>>
>> Given that the error messages from ruby are themselves readable, it's a
>> fair bet that IBM737 is at least ASCII-compatible.
>>

>
> This is what Roger Pack asked on Ruby core about IBM737
>
>> > P.S.: Why `gem` is trying to convert from UTF-16LE ?

>>
>> I wondered that too.
>>
>> But more importantly, why is the locale's default_encoding significant?
>> Is it reading files from the filesystem without specifying the locale
>> (or binary mode)? If so that's a "bug" in rubygems, but it's the
>> language which makes these bugs occur.

>
> Excellent question, seems to me that is trying to parse some gemspec
> contents (my guess)
>
> Complete output of "gem install xxx --debug -V" will be great to have
> when chcp is set to 737


Pardon if this considered to be high-jacking --
I installed ruby-1.9.2p0 using ruby installer. This is the responses I
get that was asked to the op.


ruby -v:
ruby 1.9.2p0 (2010-08-1 [i386-mingw32]


ruby -e 'puts Encoding.find "local"'
IBM437

ruby -e 'puts $:'
C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1
C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1/i386-msvcrt
C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.9.1
C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.9.1/i386-msvcrt
C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby
C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/1.9.1
C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/1.9.1/i386-msvcrt


Is IBM437 an appropriate answer?
If not, how do I correct it?

Thank You



--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ruby on Rails Developer – London – Upto £55k – Ruby on Rails Jason Wong Ruby 0 11-20-2007 11:01 AM
[ANN] Italy on Rails - First Europe Ruby on Rails Conference Nathaniel Brown Ruby 2 03-26-2006 07:58 PM
Rails and Ruby in Germany -> Rails is Ruby killer application Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT Ruby 5 01-24-2006 11:13 PM
[Rails][ANN] BoilerPlate 0.1.0 -- An application skeleton for Ruby on Rails Michael Schuerig Ruby 3 06-17-2005 07:00 PM
Rails problem - Trying code in "Rolling with Rails on Ruby" article colotechpro@yahoo.com Ruby 6 03-17-2005 12:15 AM



Advertisments