«

Hello!

I am trying to replace .+ operator of Numeric class if and only if
argument (summand) is my own class.

To be more specific: I am writing geometry module in Ruby and need to
implement vector-number multiplication so that both:

2 * vector
vector * 2

work well.

Therefore I need to replace .+ method of Numeric without spoiling
arithmetical operations with other classes. It is clear, that in case of
inheritance we can just write:

class MyNumeric < Numeric
def +(object)
super(object) unless object.kind_of?(Vector)

# vector-number multiplication here...
end
end

But, of course, we need a replacement here. How to implement it?

class Numeric
def +(vector)
unless vector.kinf_of?(Vector)
# What to write here??!
end

# vector-number multiplication here...
end
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On Nov 4, 4:52=A0am, Daniel Vartanov <daniel.varta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am trying to replace .+ operator of Numeric class if and only if
> argument (summand) is my own class.
>
> To be more specific: I am writing geometry module in Ruby and need to
> implement vector-number multiplication so that both:
>
> 2 * vector
> vector * 2
>
> work well.
>
> Therefore I need to replace .+ method of Numeric without spoiling
> arithmetical operations with other classes. It is clear, that in case of
> inheritance we can just write:
>
> class MyNumeric < Numeric
> =A0 def +(object)
> =A0 =A0 super(object) unless object.kind_of?(Vector)
>
> =A0 =A0 # vector-number multiplication here...
> =A0 end
> end
>
> But, of course, we need a replacement here. How to implement it?

class Numeric
alias_method :_plus, :+
=A0 def +(vector)
=A0 =A0 unless vector.kind_of?(Vector)
=A0 =A0 =A0 return _plus(vector)
=A0 =A0 end

=A0 =A0 # vector-number multiplication here...
end

But maybe better something like:

class Numeric
def self.op_map(op, klass=3Dnil, &block)
op =3D op.to_sym
@op_map ||=3D {}
@op_map[op] ||=3D {}
return @op_map[op] unless klass
return @op_map[op][klass] unless block
@op_map[op][klass] =3D block
end

alias_method :_plus, :+

def +(operand)
if procedure =3D self.class.op_map[:+][operand.class]
procedure.call(operand)
else
_plus(vector)
end
end
end

Numeric.op_map(:+,Vector) do |operand|
# ... your vector addition here
end

T.

2008/11/4 Daniel Vartanov <>:
> I am trying to replace .+ operator of Numeric class if and only if
> argument (summand) is my own class.
>
> To be more specific: I am writing geometry module in Ruby and need to
> implement vector-number multiplication so that both:
>
> 2 * vector
> vector * 2
>
> work well.

Daniel, look at [ruby-talk:98763], for example here:

http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin...uby-talk/98763

Regards,
Pit

2008/11/4 Daniel Vartanov <>:
> I am trying to replace .+ operator of Numeric class if and only if
> argument (summand) is my own class.
>
> To be more specific: I am writing geometry module in Ruby and need to
> implement vector-number multiplication so that both:
>
> 2 * vector
> vector * 2
>
> work well.
>
> Therefore I need to replace .+ method of Numeric without spoiling
> arithmetical operations with other classes.

No, you don't. You need to implement #coerce and #+, #- etc. in
*your* class properly (see the link Pit provided for one, albeit not
very complete example). Basically your coerce is invoked when Fixnum#+
sees an instance of your class so you are in control what operation is
finally implemented.

You can find more hits with
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin...ax=50&whence=0

Cheers

robert

--
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end

Daniel Vartanov ha scritto:
> Hello!
>
> I am trying to replace .+ operator of Numeric class if and only if
> argument (summand) is my own class.
>
> To be more specific: I am writing geometry module in Ruby and need to
> implement vector-number multiplication so that both:
>
> 2 * vector
> vector * 2
>
> work well.
>
> Therefore I need to replace .+ method of Numeric without spoiling
> arithmetical operations with other classes.
>

Hi Daniel,

take a look at:

http://www.splatbang.com/rubyquiz/qu...lar_Arithmetic

Hope that helps.
Andrea

Thanks, guys! coercing mechanism is really useful. Due to multiplication
is commutative, I just swapped multiplier in coerce method, so even if
(2 * vector) is called, it calls vector.+(2) finally.

def *(scalar)
Vector.new(x * scalar, y * scalar)
end

def coerce(scalar)
[self, scalar]
end

vector * 2 # vector.*(2) is called
2 * vector # 2.*(vector), then vector.coerce(2), then vector.*(2)

Thanks again!
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

2008/11/4 Daniel Vartanov <>:
> Thanks, guys! coercing mechanism is really useful. Due to multiplication
> is commutative, I just swapped multiplier in coerce method, so even if
> (2 * vector) is called, it calls vector.+(2) finally.
>
> def *(scalar)
> Vector.new(x * scalar, y * scalar)
> end
>
> def coerce(scalar)
> [self, scalar]
> end

I am not sure whether this implementation adheres to the contract of
#coerce. Normally you need to return the representative of the
*other* instance first:

irb(main):002:0> 1.coerce 2.0
=> [2.0, 1.0]

It may be ok in your case though. Note also, that you do no type
checking in #* which you should do in order to properly react on
values other than scalars. IMHO normally the logic should be "if the
other instance is not of the same class as self invoke #coerce on it".

> vector * 2 # vector.*(2) is called
> 2 * vector # 2.*(vector), then vector.coerce(2), then vector.*(2)

Kind regards

robert

--
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end

Hi, Robert.

> I am not sure whether this implementation adheres to the contract of
> #coerce. Normally you need to return the representative of the
> *other* instance first:
> irb(main):002:0> 1.coerce 2.0
> => [2.0, 1.0]

Swapping is the main point here, we exploit commutativity of
multiplication. If Numeric can be *converted back* to your type, you can
use this approach (actually you mentioned it in one of threads ):
def coerce(x) [self.class.new( x ), self]; end

But Numeric cannot be converted back to Vector. Just look what people do
in case of subtraction, which is not commutative:
http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-...288902532dcc6c
(note, he uses swapping too)

> Note also, that you do no type checking in #* which you should do in order to
> properly react on values other than scalars.
I think you a right here, thanks for comment. I relied on the Vector.*
method, where an exception will be raised if numerical components of
vector is multiplied by something else than Numeric. But such exception
is not descriptive enough, so I decided to include such checking:

def coerce(scalar)
if scalar.is_a?(Numeric)
[self, scalar]
else
raise ArgumentError, "Vector: cannot coerce #{scalar.inspect}"
end
end

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.