On May 5, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Une B=E9vue wrote:
> which suppose their is a norm somewhere, ie. something able to measure
> what is worst what is best...
i don't think the implication is an absolute one. whether relative or =20=
absolute i think it would be rare the to find a being that did not =20
know this about themselves at some, possibly deeply hidden, level.
a @
http://codeforpeople.com/
--
we can deny everything, except that we have the possibility of being =20
better. simply reflect on that.
h.h. the 14th dalai lama