Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > Ruby > RubyConf2006 Retrospective

Reply
Thread Tools

RubyConf2006 Retrospective

 
 
Bil Kleb
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-24-2006
Hi,

To learn from RubyConf06, I am assuming the role
of "independent third party" to aggregate comments
about what should

a) stop
b) continue
c) start

for next year's conference. Please try to include
the "why" and bear in mind Kerth's Prime Directive
for retrospectives,

Regardless of what we discover, we must understand
and truly believe that everyone did the best job
s/he could, given what was known at the time, his
or her skills and abilities, the resources available,
and the situation at hand.

*Please send comments offline* to

private.php?do=newpm&u=?subject=RubyConf06

to avoid violating the premises of Surowiekcki's
/The Wisdom of Crowds/, and I'll post a summary,
complete with /anonymized/ individual responses.

Thanks,
--
Bil Kleb
http://fun3d.larc.nasa.gov
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
ara.t.howard@noaa.gov
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-24-2006
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Bil Kleb wrote:

> Hi,
>
> To learn from RubyConf06, I am assuming the role
> of "independent third party" to aggregate comments
> about what should
>
> a) stop


meeting in a room which cannot support 250+ network connections.


-a
--
my religion is very simple. my religion is kindness. -- the dalai lama

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Tim Pease
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-24-2006
On 10/24/06, Bil Kleb <> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> b) continue
>


Single track for presentations.

TwP

 
Reply With Quote
 
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-24-2006
Bil Kleb wrote:

> *Please send comments offline* to
>
> private.php?do=newpm&u=?subject=RubyConf06
>
> to avoid violating the premises of Surowiekcki's
> /The Wisdom of Crowds/,


Hmmm ... is this on line?

> and I'll post a summary,
> complete with /anonymized/ individual responses.


I prefer to remain nonymized ... see

http://borasky-research.blogspot.com...-fracture.html

P.S.: You know, the Norfolk, Virginia area would be a *wonderful* place
for RubyConf 2007!

 
Reply With Quote
 
James Britt
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-24-2006
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:

> P.S.: You know, the Norfolk, Virginia area would be a *wonderful* place
> for RubyConf 2007!


Hey! Virginia already had a RubyConf.

Time for New York City, or (to make this actually international) Toronto.


Not that I want to encourage rampant speculation or debate on the next
location.



--
James Britt

"If you don't write it down, it never happened."
- (Unknown)

 
Reply With Quote
 
Gregory Brown
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-25-2006
On 10/24/06, Tim Pease <> wrote:
> On 10/24/06, Bil Kleb <> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > b) continue
> >

>
> Single track for presentations.


+1

 
Reply With Quote
 
Bil Kleb
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-25-2006
Tim Pease wrote:
> On 10/24/06, Bil Kleb <> wrote:
>> b) continue

>
> Single track for presentations.


Thanks, but I'm still waiting on the offlist and "why?"
part of the original request...

Later,
--
Bil Kleb
http://fun3d.larc.nasa.gov
 
Reply With Quote
 
Bil Kleb
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-25-2006
wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Bil Kleb wrote:
>> a) stop

>
> meeting in a room which cannot support 250+ network connections.


Thanks, but I'm still waiting on the offlist and "why?"
part of the original request...

Later,
--
Bil Kleb
http://fun3d.larc.nasa.gov
 
Reply With Quote
 
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-25-2006
James Britt wrote:
> M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
>
>> P.S.: You know, the Norfolk, Virginia area would be a *wonderful* place
>> for RubyConf 2007!

>
> Hey! Virginia already had a RubyConf.
>
> Time for New York City, or (to make this actually international) Toronto.
>
>
> Not that I want to encourage rampant speculation or debate on the next
> location.
>
>
>


Well ... OK ... nominations in the Eastern Time Zone for places that are
*inexpensive* to visit!

1. Norfolk, Virginia
2. Charlotte, North Carolina
3. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
4. ...

 
Reply With Quote
 
ara.t.howard@noaa.gov
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-25-2006
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Bil Kleb wrote:

> Tim Pease wrote:
>> On 10/24/06, Bil Kleb <> wrote:
>>> b) continue

>>
>> Single track for presentations.

>
> Thanks, but I'm still waiting on the offlist and "why?"
> part of the original request...


i'm for multi-track: it's not a good use of time to do presentations when only
25% of the room is likely to use the information, regardless of how
interesting they might be or how good the speaker might be.

2 cts.

-a
--
my religion is very simple. my religion is kindness. -- the dalai lama

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Tablet Retrospective Lawrence D'Oliveiro NZ Computing 1 03-21-2011 09:29 AM
software requirements again, retrospective ccc31807 Perl Misc 2 04-13-2010 09:03 PM
Ruby Retrospective Post at Linux Journal pat eyler Ruby 0 12-30-2006 03:46 PM
RubyConf2006: my presentation SASADA Koichi Ruby 2 11-07-2006 03:42 PM
Javascript Retrospective pau1graham@yahoo.com Javascript 2 08-23-2005 07:30 AM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57