In reading through all the interesting solutions to this quiz, I noticed two

things. Some solutions were easy to follow and have clever ways to do the work.

Others were very fast, thanks to good optimizations. Let's examine one of each.

First, here is Brian Schroeder's complete solution (minus a line I removed):

#!/usr/bin/ruby

# Break early version, checking if a number is weird

def weird_number(n)

sum = 0

subset_sums = Hash.new

subset_sums[0] = true

for d in 1...n

next unless n % d == 0

# Calculate sum of all divisors

sum += d

# Calculate sums for all subsets

subset_sums.keys.each do | s |

return false if s + d == n

subset_sums[s + d] = true

end

end

sum > n

end

def weird_numbers(range)

range.select { | n | weird_number(n) }

end

# Argument parsing

raise "Input exactly one number" unless ARGV.length == 1

max = ARGV[0].to_i

# Call it

puts weird_numbers(1..max)

This code is not blazing fast, but it's easy to follow and a unique approach.

That's worth a look, I think.

All the action is in weird_number(), which just returns true or false to

indicate if the passed argument is indeed weird. It begins by initializing an

overall sum variable and a Hash for subset_sums. Notice that 0 is added to

subset_sums here. We will look at that more in a bit. (All the values of this

Hash are set to true, but they are really unused. Brian just wanted the unique

property of Hash keys.)

The method then walks from 1 to the number, looking for divisors. When a

divisor is found, it's added to the sum and then added to each previous

subset_sum (or just 0 on the first occurrence). Each time a new subset_sum is

generated, the total is checked against the number itself. This allows the code

to return an early false, when it finds a match.

If none of the subset_sums short-circuited the process, a final check is made to

ensure that the overall sum exceeds the number. When it does, a weird number is

found.

The rest of Brian's code is just argument parsing, the search through the range

of numbers, and output. This is very simple stuff.

I might suggest one change and that would be that printing the numbers as they

are found makes the wait a little less tedious, I think. That's an easy fix.

The last line of code can be switched to:

(1..max).each { |n| puts n if weird_number n }

Brian's code needs over a minute to find the weird numbers from 1 to 10,000.

That's the downside. If you want to do it faster, you have to find some

shortcuts and some submitters found great ones.

Let's switch gears to Ryan Leavengood's code, which can do the same calculation

in under a second. It starts with a simple helper method:

class Array

def sum

inject(0) do |result, i|

result + i

end

end

end

# ...

I assume the standard Ruby idiom for summation needs little introduction. Let's

move on to the heart of the algorithm:

# ...

class Integer

def weird?

# No odd numbers are weird within reasonable limits.

return false if self % 2 == 1

# A weird number is abundant but not semi-perfect.

divisors = calc_divisors

abundance = divisors.sum - 2 * self

# First make sure the number is abundant.

if abundance > 0

# Now see if the number is semi-perfect. If it is, it isn't weird.

# First thing see if the abundance is in the divisors.

if divisors.include?(abundance)

false

else

# Now see if any combination sums of divisors yields the abundance.

# We reject any divisors greater than the abundance and reverse the

# result to try and get sums close to the abundance sooner.

to_search = divisors.reject{|i| i > abundance}.reverse

sum = to_search.sum

if sum == abundance

false

elsif sum < abundance

true

else

not abundance.sum_in_subset?(to_search)

end

end

else

false

end

end

# ...

Finding out if a number is weird requires a fair amount of processing. We need

all of the divisors (a lot of work to find on big numbers), subset sums for

those divisors, etc. However, we know some things about weird numbers that can

be tested faster. If less work rules out that process some of the time, it can

add up to a big win.

First of all, there are no known odd weird numbers, so we might as well toss out

half of the set right off the bat. (It's possible there are some very large odd

weird numbers, but we would have trouble calculating those anyway.) Going a

step further, there are simple mathematical formulas to determine if a number is

abundant or semi-perfect. We can use those to quickly eliminate many numbers,

because weird numbers are always abundant and never semi-perfect. If we make it

that far, we will still have to do the work, but that allows us to skip a good

deal of numbers that would have cost us time.

# ...

def calc_divisors

res=[1]

2.upto(Math.sqrt(self).floor) do |i|

if self % i == 0

res << i

end

end

res.reverse.each do |i|

res << self / i

end

res.uniq

end

def sum_in_subset?(a)

if self < 0

false

elsif a.include?(self)

true

else

if a.length == 1

false

else

f = a.first

remaining = a[1..-1]

(self - f).sum_in_subset?(remaining) or sum_in_subset?(remaining)

end

end

end

end

# ...

There are even shortcuts to be found in the work itself. The biggest is in

calculating divisors. You can just find those between 1 and the square root of

the number, then use those to get the rest. Also, when checking divisor sums,

work with the big numbers first, to get totals closer to the actual number that

may rule it out quickly.

Another interesting option, much debated in the quiz solution thread, is the

ability to add a cache to the program. If a weird number is added to the cache

when found, future queries can be lightning quick. Here's a nice bit of code

Ryan added just to shut me up about the merits of caching (a noble goal!):

# ...

class WeirdCache

def initialize(filename='.weirdcache')

@filename = filename

if test(?e, filename)

@numbers = IO.readlines(filename).map do |i|

i.chomp.to_i

end

else

@numbers=[]

end

@added = false

end

def each(&block)

@numbers.each(&block)

end

def <<(i)

@added = true

@numbers << i

end

def save

if @added

File.open(@filename, File::RDWR|File::CREAT|File::TRUNC) do |file|

file.puts @numbers

end

end

end

end

# ...

Nothing tricky there. We just have a container for numbers with the ability to

save it out to disk. You can see that it is reloaded upon creation.

Finally, here's the code that ties all this together:

# ...

if $0 == __FILE__

if ARGV.length < 1

puts "Usage: #$0 <upper limit>"

exit(1)

end

puts "Weird numbers up to and including #{ARGV[0]}:"

start = Time.now

cache = WeirdCache.new

at_exit {cache.save}

limit = ARGV[0].to_i

i = 69

cache.each do |i|

if i <= limit

puts i

end

end

(i+1).upto(limit) do |j|

if j.weird?

cache << j

puts j

end

end

puts "This took #{Time.now - start} seconds"

end

Notice the nice use of variable scoping there. The variable i is set to 69

before the cache is walked. (Another optimization. 70 is the first weird

number, so we can safely skip anything before that.) Numbers in the cache will

replace i, leaving it holding the highest known weird number. Then, if the

limit is higher than that, the code only needs to calculate from there up.

I've barely scratched the surface of the solutions here. There were many more

gems hidden in them. I do recommend browsing the source of the others for

picking up new tricks.

My thanks to all who solved this problem, took my abuse about caching, and

especially to Ryan for building what I pestered him for.

We have two back-to-back quizzes for all you gamers out there coming up next.

First, Kalah anyone?