Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > Ruby > Still use 'ruby-bugs' for Ruby bugs?

Reply
Thread Tools

Still use 'ruby-bugs' for Ruby bugs?

 
 
Josef 'Jupp' Schugt
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-04-2004
Hi!

I am presently rewriting the German edition of the c.l.r FAQ using the
wiki-ish Ruby software 'deplate' (actually this is almost done). En
passent I am checking the validity of all links, thereby finding a
couple of dead links and other issues.

The most prominent problem is that the FAQ still states (quoting the
original FAQ):

> If reporting a bug, please copy (cc your post to
> ruby-bugs[(E-Mail Removed)]. This will enter your report into
> the Ruby bug database. You can browse the database
> here[http://www.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/ruby-bugs].


While the inexistence of the latter can easily be checked by means of
HTTP, the former would require sending a dummy bug report. Is the above
bug-reporting procedure still usable and if what's the replacement?

Josef 'Jupp' Schugt <jupp(a)gmx(d)de>
--
Messages larger than 100 KiB will be discarded *without* notification!
http://oss.erdfunkstelle.de/ruby/ German ed. of comp.lang.ruby FAQ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Body bag: rucksack. Leichensack: Body bag. -- Bin D-Strich, translator



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Florian Gross
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-04-2004
Josef 'Jupp' Schugt wrote:

>> If reporting a bug, please copy (cc your post to
>> ruby-bugs[(E-Mail Removed)]. This will enter your report into
>> the Ruby bug database. You can browse the database
>> here[http://www.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/ruby-bugs].

>
> While the inexistence of the latter can easily be checked by means of
> HTTP, the former would require sending a dummy bug report. Is the above
> bug-reporting procedure still usable and if what's the replacement?


I'm not sure if the above is still valid, but as far as I know the
preferred ways are ruby-core and the new bug tracker on RubyForge:

http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?group_id=426
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Tom Copeland
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-04-2004
> I'm not sure if the above is still valid, but as far as I know the
> preferred ways are ruby-core and the new bug tracker on RubyForge:
> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?group_id=426


Right on. Also, when you file a bug or patch on the RubyForge project,
an email gets sent automatically to ruby-core.

Yours,

Tom




 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
lib/ruby/1.8/e2mmap.rb:51: Use Ruby 1.1 (RuntimeError) - WindowsVista Ruby 1.8.6 Zeno Davatz Ruby 2 01-12-2011 09:31 AM
Compiling DLLs - but still use Ruby? Jason Lillywhite Ruby 1 12-02-2010 11:40 PM
Intstalled Ruby 1.8.7 but still getting ruby -v => 1.8.6 Mitchell Gould Ruby 6 08-18-2010 03:10 PM
Mozilla: Can I still keep IE and outlook? Or still vulnerable to viruses? lbbss Computer Support 6 08-16-2004 11:55 PM
comp.lang.ruby <-> ruby-talk gateway still broken David Alan Black Ruby 1 02-18-2004 02:05 AM



Advertisments