On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, MC wrote:
> RichA wrote:
>
>> Are free, cheap photosites like Flickr and Facebook becoming dumping
>> grounds for mediocrity en masse? They mention it briefly in this
>> article.
>
>
> That is why serious photographers should avoid these sites where their
> own images are concerned. No decent photographer worth his salt should
> even consider using them.
This is a bit silly to say. Some very high-end photographers regularly
use Flickr. There are plenty of average amateur photographers on
Flickr, but there are also a plethora of extremely talented amateur and
professional photographers who regularly use Flickr. Also, Flickr is a
relatively easy front door into Getty (compared with trying to get into
their house collections or trying to guess which agency they are going to
buy next).
>> I can't believe someone would take hundreds of photos and
>> dump them online without reviewing them and paring them down to the
>> better ones.
>
>
> But that is the point. They are just that, "dumping grounds". Unless
> the sites charge per MB or per image they will always be used as such.
Flickr can be whatever you want it to be. As for myself, I tend to use it
as a service for displaying my work (at web resolution), as a service for
marketing my work
(through Getty), and as a place where I can store an unlimited amount of
photos in the cloud (privately) for both backup purposes and for having
easy access to the full resolution photos when I am traveling and get
inquiries from clients and don't have my photo library with me.
-Ryan McGinnis
The BIG Storm Picture:
http://bigstormpicture.com PGP Key 0x65115E4C
Follow my storm chasing adventures at
http://bigstormpicture.blogspot.com
Images@Getty:
http://bit.ly/oDW1pT Images@Alamy:<a href="http://bit.ly"...p://bit.ly</a>
/aMH6Qd