On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 12:52:50 +1300, whoisthis <>
wrote:
>In article <>,
> nospam <> wrote:
>
>>
>> Well the failure rate in TVs is very low. Why would dell motherboards
>> fail more than any other circuit board.
>
>Because thats the market they work in, they buy cheaper components to
>supply cheaper computers. People also replace their computers far more
>often than their TVs, so the expectation of a TV is MUCH higher.
>
>http://gizmodo.com/5576237/dell-know...computers-with
>-a-97-failure-rate
That was a one off thing as I wrote in my other post. At least some
of dell goods get made by foxconn which probably means the components
have similar quality to apple iphones etc. Foxconn are big enough and
smart enough to choose decent components.
>
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> The laptop I bought is $2100 new on the dell website including 3 year
>> >> warranty so hopefully it has all good quality components.
>> >
>> >ROTFLMAO, its called the consumer guarantees act. All you have done is
>> >give them money for something they would have to do under the law anyway.
>>
>> I paid less than a third of that but with no warranty which I now have
>> the option of. I bought it from grays online and the "sales of goods
>> act" doesn't apply to the sale even though the laptop is brand new
>> ("resealed").
>
>And what does "resealed" mean ?
http://www.graysonline.co.nz/help/NZ..._condition.asp
>>
>> Two and a half years is not "fairly new". So who gets to decide what
>> "durable" means?
>
>It depends on what it is, but the courts will decide. I know of a
>company (I know the manager) who had to replace a motherboard after 5
>years even thought they were 99% sure the user killed it by putting in
>RAM without using an anti-static strap, it went to the small claims and
>they lost !
I find it hard to believe that a court would do that. Also, unless
the machine failed immediately after the ram was put in, I don't see
how they could be certain what killed the MB.