«

Nick Keighley <> writes:
> On Dec 23, 12:52Â*pm, jacob navia <ja...@spamsink.net> wrote:
>> Le 23/12/11 11:49, pete a écrit :
>> > The number (509) appears more than once
>> > in the C90 standard
>> > in a related context.
>>
>> > ISO/IEC 9899: 1990
>>
>> That is not the C standard, it has been obsoleted by the standard of
>> 1999 where the enviromental limits have been increased to more
>> reasonable values.
>
> C89/90 is still the most portable standard

And with the recent publication of the ISO C 2011 standard, C99 is now
just as obsolete as C89/C90.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst- <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Will write code for food.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Keith Thompson <kst-> writes:

> Nick Keighley <> writes:
>> On Dec 23, 12:52 pm, jacob navia <ja...@spamsink.net> wrote:
>>> Le 23/12/11 11:49, pete a @C3{A9}crit :
>>> > The number (509) appears more than once
>>> > in the C90 standard
>>> > in a related context.
>>>
>>> > ISO/IEC 9899: 1990
>>>
>>> That is not the C standard, it has been obsoleted by the standard of
>>> 1999 where the enviromental limits have been increased to more
>>> reasonable values.
>>
>> C89/90 is still the most portable standard
>
> And with the recent publication of the ISO C 2011 standard, C99 is now
> just as obsolete as C89/C90.

Well, maybe not quite _just_ as obsolete.