«

In article <>,
Keith Thompson <kst-> blubbered:
....
>Once again, you have posted a response that has nothing to do with what
>you're responding to.
>
>Let me ask you something. Are you able to respond directly to
>a question? Yes or no. If you can manage that, we just might be
>able to get somewhere.

Kiks, this is not a courtroom, and you are not the District Attorney.

--
Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as foolish,
and by the rulers as useful.

(Seneca the Younger, 65 AD)

In article <>,
Keith Thompson <kst-> wrote:
....
>> I am not interested to argue with those can't contribute in this news group.
>
>Thank you for answering my question, even though you didn't intend to.
>
>*PLONK*

As District Attorney Thomson rests his case and retreats to his cave...

--
Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is
no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.

- John Kenneth Galbraith -

On 2011-12-29, Geoff <> wrote:
> Hallelujah. I don't know what took you so long. I hope Seebs is done
> too.

I think so. Thing is, this one's relatively good at saying things which
are vague enough that you could ALMOST think they had meaning, and were merely
confused. Eventually you realize that it's programming horoscopes.

-s
--
Copyright 2011, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet-
http://www.seebs.net/log/ <-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) <-- get educated!
I am not speaking for my employer, although they do rent some of my opinions.

Seebs <usenet-> writes:

> On 2011-12-29, Geoff <> wrote:
>> Hallelujah. I don't know what took you so long. I hope Seebs is done
>> too.
>
> I think so. Thing is, this one's relatively good at saying things which
> are vague enough that you could ALMOST think they had meaning, and were merely
> confused. Eventually you realize that it's programming horoscopes.

Some undergrads' attempt at a program to pass the Turing Test?

-- Patrick

Patrick Scheibleæ–¼ 2011å¹´12月30日星期五UTC+8上å�ˆ4時52分35ç§ ’寫é�“：
> Seebs <usenet...@seebs.net> writes:
>
> > On 2011-12-29, Geoff <> wrote:
> >> Hallelujah. I don't know what took you so long. I hope Seebs is done
> >> too.
> >
> > I think so. Thing is, this one's relatively good at saying things which
> > are vague enough that you could ALMOST think they had meaning, and weremerely
> > confused. Eventually you realize that it's programming horoscopes.
>
> Some undergrads' attempt at a program to pass the Turing Test?
>
> -- Patrick

A lot people don't understand BWT and the so old DNA sequencing problem.

88888 Dihedralæ–¼ 2012å¹´1月2日星期一UTC+8下å�ˆ6時45分49ç§’å ¯«é�“：
> Patrick Scheibleæ–¼ 2011å¹´12月30日星期五UTC+8上å�ˆ4時52分35ç§ ’寫é�“：
> > Seebs <usen...@seebs.net> writes:
> >
> > > On 2011-12-29, Geoff <> wrote:
> > >> Hallelujah. I don't know what took you so long. I hope Seebs is done
> > >> too.
> > >
> > > I think so. Thing is, this one's relatively good at saying things which
> > > are vague enough that you could ALMOST think they had meaning, and were merely
> > > confused. Eventually you realize that it's programming horoscopes.
> >
> > Some undergrads' attempt at a program to pass the Turing Test?
> >
> > -- Patrick
>
> A lot people don't understand BWT and the so old DNA sequencing problem.

It is well paid to search in a set of DNA subsequences
for a statistical test.

These kinds of applications in forensics are important.