«

Ian Collins <ian-> writes:
> On 11/13/11 07:39 PM, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> > Keith Thompson wrote:
> >> "Bill Cunningham"<> writes:
> >>> pete wrote:
> >>>> return *aa> *bb ? -1 : *aa != *bb;
> >>>
> >>> Can you show me that for loop that's not in shorthand? This is
> >>> kind of hard to read.
> >>
> >> What for loop?
> >
> > Ok I saw the ?: and thought it might be part of for.
>
> Doesn't a for loop normally include the word "for"?

Ok I saw the From: line and thought it might be part of a troll.

Phil
--
Unix is simple. It just takes a genius to understand its simplicity
-- Dennis Ritchie (1941-2011), Unix Co-Creator

On Nov 13, 6:51*am, Ian Collins <ian-n...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/13/11 07:39 PM, Bill Cunningham wrote:
>
> > Keith Thompson wrote:
> >> "Bill Cunningham"<nos...@nspam.invalid> *writes:
> >>> pete wrote:
> >>>> * * return *aa> **bb ? -1 : *aa != *bb;
>
> >>> * * *Can you show me that for loop that's not in shorthand? This is
> >>> kind of hard to read.
>
> >> What for loop?
>
> > Ok I saw the ?: and thought it might be part of for.
>
> Doesn't a for loop normally include the word "for"?

does it normally include a "?"?