«

On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:17:32 +0000, Jeff wrote:

> I believe I've done it - I've created the world's worst website. Take a
> look at www.worlds-worst-website.com and let me know if you can think of
> ways I can make it even worse! - Jeff

Yes: jiggling panels and moving cartoonish pictures.

--
Dieter Britz

On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:38:26 +0000, Dieter Britz wrote:

> On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:17:32 +0000, Jeff wrote:
>
>> I believe I've done it - I've created the world's worst website. Take a
>> look at www.worlds-worst-website.com and let me know if you can think
>> of ways I can make it even worse! - Jeff
>
> Yes: jiggling panels and moving cartoonish pictures.

I'd like to submit http://yvettesbridalformal.com/

Rgds

Denis McMahon

On 2011-11-05 14:38:26 +0100, Dieter Britz said:

> On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:17:32 +0000, Jeff wrote:
>
>> I believe I've done it - I've created the world's worst website. Take a
>> look at www.worlds-worst-website.com and let me know if you can think of
>> ways I can make it even worse! - Jeff
>
> Yes: jiggling panels and moving cartoonish pictures.

The dark blue background is too restful. It needs to be maroon. Some
yellow text on a white background. A lot more spelling mistakes (at the
moment they appear to concern only the words that Jeff doesn't know how
to spell). Not enough HTML errors. Not enough dead links. This site
wouldn't make it into the bottom 100.

--
athel

On Nov 5, 8:25*am, Denis McMahon <denismfmcma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:38:26 +0000, Dieter Britz wrote:
> > On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:17:32 +0000, Jeff wrote:
>
> >> I believe I've done it - I've created the world's worst website. Take a
> >> look atwww.worlds-worst-website.comand let me know if you can think
> >> of ways I can make it even worse! - Jeff
>
> > Yes: *jiggling panels and moving cartoonish pictures.
>
> I'd like to submithttp://yvettesbridalformal.com/

Yes, I remember that site.

I think one could even do much worse, but I do not have time for that
just now. For a start see www.cwdjr.info/dhtml/grasshopper.html . This
comes from the dhtml era several years ago. Now to this one could add
many random flashing colored lines, a self started midi, a flashing
background and random background color changes. The absolute
positioning of the dhtml effect and extreme text size should cause
some interesting problems on small resolution screens.

On Nov 6, 6:48*pm, cwdjrxyz <spamtr...@cwdjr.info> wrote:
> On Nov 5, 8:25*am, Denis McMahon <denismfmcma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:38:26 +0000, Dieter Britz wrote:
> > > On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:17:32 +0000, Jeff wrote:
>
> > >> I believe I've done it - I've created the world's worst website. Take a
> > >> look atwww.worlds-worst-website.comandlet me know if you can think
> > >> of ways I can make it even worse! - Jeff
>
> > > Yes: *jiggling panels and moving cartoonish pictures.
>
> > I'd like to submithttp://yvettesbridalformal.com/
>
> Yes, I remember that site.
>
> I think one could even do much worse, but I do not have time for that
> just now. For a start seewww.cwdjr.info/dhtml/grasshopper.html. This
> comes from the dhtml era several years ago. Now to this one could add
> many random flashing colored lines, a self started midi, a flashing
> background and random background color changes. The absolute
> positioning of the dhtml effect and extreme text size should cause
> some interesting problems on small resolution screens.

Try http://www.cwdjr.info/dhtml/grasshopper.html instead of the url
given above.

På Sat, 05 Nov 2011 15:25:17 +0100, skrev Denis McMahon
<>:

> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:38:26 +0000, Dieter Britz wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:17:32 +0000, Jeff wrote:
>>
>>> I believe I've done it - I've created the world's worst website. Take a
>>> look at www.worlds-worst-website.com and let me know if you can think
>>> of ways I can make it even worse! - Jeff
>>
>> Yes: jiggling panels and moving cartoonish pictures.
>
> I'd like to submit http://yvettesbridalformal.com/

Yep, I remember that one as well.

I still think Arngren Electronics (a Norwegian mail-order electronics
store) is a contender. Although not as awful as Yvette, it's still quite
bad.
http://arngren.net/

--
Kim André Akerø
-
(remove NOSPAM to contact me directly)

On 11/06/2011 10:39 PM, Kim André Akerø wrote:
> På Sat, 05 Nov 2011 15:25:17 +0100, skrev Denis McMahon
> <>:
>
>> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:38:26 +0000, Dieter Britz wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:17:32 +0000, Jeff wrote:
>>>
>>>> I believe I've done it - I've created the world's worst website. Take a
>>>> look at www.worlds-worst-website.com and let me know if you can think
>>>> of ways I can make it even worse! - Jeff
>>>
>>> Yes: jiggling panels and moving cartoonish pictures.
>>
>> I'd like to submit http://yvettesbridalformal.com/
>
> Yep, I remember that one as well.
>
> I still think Arngren Electronics (a Norwegian mail-order electronics
> store) is a contender. Although not as awful as Yvette, it's still quite
> bad.
> http://arngren.net/
>

Looks like a mail-order catalog... someone should let them know
they've been hacked though.

--
Norman
Registered Linux user #461062
AMD64X2 6400+ Ubuntu 10.04 64bit

På Mon, 07 Nov 2011 12:12:00 +0100, skrev Norman Peelman
<>:

> On 11/06/2011 10:39 PM, Kim André Akerø wrote:
>> På Sat, 05 Nov 2011 15:25:17 +0100, skrev Denis McMahon
>> <>:
>>
>>> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:38:26 +0000, Dieter Britz wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:17:32 +0000, Jeff wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I believe I've done it - I've created the world's worst website.
>>>>> Take a
>>>>> look at www.worlds-worst-website.com and let me know if you can think
>>>>> of ways I can make it even worse! - Jeff
>>>>
>>>> Yes: jiggling panels and moving cartoonish pictures.
>>>
>>> I'd like to submit http://yvettesbridalformal.com/
>>
>> Yep, I remember that one as well.
>>
>> I still think Arngren Electronics (a Norwegian mail-order electronics
>> store) is a contender. Although not as awful as Yvette, it's still quite
>> bad.
>> http://arngren.net/
>>
>
> Looks like a mail-order catalog... someone should let them know
> they've been hacked though.

Hacked, you say? Was there any particular section that you were thinking
of?

--
Kim André Akerø
-
(remove NOSPAM to contact me directly)

On 11/07/2011 01:18 PM, Kim André Akerø wrote:
> På Mon, 07 Nov 2011 12:12:00 +0100, skrev Norman Peelman
> <>:
>
>> On 11/06/2011 10:39 PM, Kim André Akerø wrote:
>>> På Sat, 05 Nov 2011 15:25:17 +0100, skrev Denis McMahon
>>> <>:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:38:26 +0000, Dieter Britz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:17:32 +0000, Jeff wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe I've done it - I've created the world's worst website.
>>>>>> Take a
>>>>>> look at www.worlds-worst-website.com and let me know if you can think
>>>>>> of ways I can make it even worse! - Jeff
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes: jiggling panels and moving cartoonish pictures.
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to submit http://yvettesbridalformal.com/
>>>
>>> Yep, I remember that one as well.
>>>
>>> I still think Arngren Electronics (a Norwegian mail-order electronics
>>> store) is a contender. Although not as awful as Yvette, it's still quite
>>> bad.
>>> http://arngren.net/
>>>
>>
>> Looks like a mail-order catalog... someone should let them know
>> they've been hacked though.
>
> Hacked, you say? Was there any particular section that you were thinking
> of?
>

Well, offhand i'd say the link to PLAYBOY and the cartoon girl
exposing her breasts don't really fit in with the rest of the site.


--
Norman
Registered Linux user #461062
AMD64X2 6400+ Ubuntu 10.04 64bit

On Nov 8, 12:21*am, Ed Mullen <e...@edmullen.net> wrote:
> cwdjrxyz wrote:
> > On Nov 6, 6:48 pm, cwdjrxyz<spamtr...@cwdjr.info> *wrote:
> >> On Nov 5, 8:25 am, Denis McMahon<denismfmcma...@gmail.com> *wrote:
>
> >>> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:38:26 +0000, Dieter Britz wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:17:32 +0000, Jeff wrote:
>
> >>>>> I believe I've done it - I've created the world's worst website. Take a
> >>>>> look atwww.worlds-worst-website.comandletme know if you can think
> >>>>> of ways I can make it even worse! - Jeff
>
> >>>> Yes: *jiggling panels and moving cartoonish pictures.
>
> >>> I'd like to submithttp://yvettesbridalformal.com/
>
> >> Yes, I remember that site.
>
> >> I think one could even do much worse, but I do not have time for that
> >> just now. For a start seewww.cwdjr.info/dhtml/grasshopper.html. This
> >> comes from the dhtml era several years ago. Now to this one could add
> >> many random flashing colored lines, a self started midi, a flashing
> >> background and random background color changes. The absolute
> >> positioning of the dhtml effect and extreme text size should cause
> >> some interesting problems on small resolution screens.
>
> > Tryhttp://www.cwdjr.info/dhtml/grasshopper.htmlinstead of *the url
> > given above.
>
> I see no difference.
The first url without the http:// will work if you go to the site
directly. However if you read the post using Google groups, you are
asked if you want to go to the site selected. If your answer yes, you
get a screen saying the site can not be found. However if you add the
html:// to the url, Google groups has no trouble finding it, at least
using the most recent stable version of Firefox on Windows Vista 64-
bit. Google in general can do some strange things at times. I guess
you could call this strange event a Googleism .

>
> --
> Ed Mullenhttp://edmullen.net/
> Why do you need a driver's license to buy alcohol when you can't drink
> and drive?