«

I have tried to resolve with other ways as well as i understand but i
was not able to resolve it; only this way works such as i want. I have
changed cost Pi from float to bouble and i have changed c control
value from '121' to 'y'. Now all works fine. I think this binary can
run well on any other windows pc as well as run on my pc. The only
problem is if anyone want to change the name of binary but i think
this is not a common choice.

On Nov 1, 8:06 pm, Ian Collins <ian-n...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > void main() {
>
> This should be int main(). On modern compilers, this won't compile
> because you are returning values.
Yes, of course........... int main() is more right but my choice is
such common that it is not more a error......

I have tried to resolve with other ways as well as i understand but i
was not able to resolve it; only this way works such as i want. I have
changed cost Pi from float to bouble and i have changed c control
value from '121' to 'y'. Now all works fine. I think this binary can
run well on any other windows pc as well as run on my pc. The only
problem is if anyone want to change the name of binary but i think
this is not a common choice.

On Nov 1, 8:06 pm, Ian Collins <ian-n...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > void main() {
>
> This should be int main(). On modern compilers, this won't compile
> because you are returning values.
Yes, of course........... int main() is more right but my choice is
such common that it is not more a error......

James Kuyper <> writes:
> On 11/01/2011 02:51 PM, zemir wrote:
<snip>
>> c=getch();
>
> You also haven't bothered to check for the possibility that getch()
> might have failed.

If it's the getch I remember, it can't fail -- by which I mean there is
no error return that can tell you anything.

<snip>
--
Ben.

I have tried to resolve with other ways as well as i understand but i
was not able to resolve it; only this way works such as i want. I have
changed cost Pi from float to bouble and i have changed c control
value from '121' to 'y'. Now all works fine. I think this binary can
run well on any other windows pc as well as run on my pc. The only
problem is if anyone want to change the name of binary but i think
this is not a common choice.

On Nov 1, 8:06 pm, Ian Collins <ian-n...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > void main() {
>
> This should be int main(). On modern compilers, this won't compile
> because you are returning values.
Yes, of course........... int main() is more right but my choice is
such common that it is not more a error......

On 11/01/2011 04:17 PM, zemir wrote:
....
> On Nov 1, 8:06 pm, Ian Collins <ian-n...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> void main() {
>>
>> This should be int main(). On modern compilers, this won't compile
>> because you are returning values.
> Yes, of course........... int main() is more right but my choice is
> such common that it is not more a error......

Just because it's a popular error doesn't make it cease to be an error.
Get it right now, while you're still learning. The fewer bad habits you
pick up now, while you're still new to the language, the less you'll
have to unlearn before you can be employable.

On 11/ 2/11 09:19 AM, zemir wrote:
> I have tried to resolve with other ways as well as i understand but i
> was not able to resolve it; only this way works such as i want. I have
> changed cost Pi from float to bouble and i have changed c control
> value from '121' to 'y'. Now all works fine. I think this binary can
> run well on any other windows pc as well as run on my pc. The only
> problem is if anyone want to change the name of binary but i think
> this is not a common choice.
>
> On Nov 1, 8:06 pm, Ian Collins<ian-n...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> void main() {
>>
>> This should be int main(). On modern compilers, this won't compile
>> because you are returning values.
> Yes, of course........... int main() is more right but my choice is
> such common that it is not more a error......

Well it is an error if you use a decent compiler. In addition to being
simply wrong, a void function can't return a value!

--
Ian Collins

On Nov 1, 9:24 pm, James Kuyper <jameskuy...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 11/01/2011 04:17 PM, zemir wrote:
> ...
>
> > On Nov 1, 8:06 pm, Ian Collins <ian-n...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> void main() {
>
> >> This should be int main(). On modern compilers, this won't compile
> >> because you are returning values.
> > Yes, of course........... int main() is more right but my choice is
> > such common that it is not more a error......
>
> Just because it's a popular error doesn't make it cease to be an error.
> Get it right now, while you're still learning. The fewer bad habits you
> pick up now, while you're still new to the language, the less you'll
> have to unlearn before you can be employable.

Ok, from now and in the future i will use always "int main()"
I am sure thai it is the right choice.

On 11/ 2/11 09:23 AM, zemir wrote:
> I have tried to resolve with other ways as well as i...

You don't have to post 3 times!

--
Ian Collins

On Nov 1, 9:24 pm, James Kuyper <jameskuy...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 11/01/2011 04:17 PM, zemir wrote:
> ...
>
> > On Nov 1, 8:06 pm, Ian Collins <ian-n...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> void main() {
>
> >> This should be int main(). On modern compilers, this won't compile
> >> because you are returning values.
> > Yes, of course........... int main() is more right but my choice is
> > such common that it is not more a error......
>
> Just because it's a popular error doesn't make it cease to be an error.
> Get it right now, while you're still learning. The fewer bad habits you
> pick up now, while you're still new to the language, the less you'll
> have to unlearn before you can be employable.

Ok, from now and in the future i will use always "int main()"
I am sure thai it is the right choice.

On Nov 1, 9:27 pm, Ian Collins <ian-n...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/ 2/11 09:23 AM, zemir wrote:
>
> > I have tried to resolve with other ways as well as i...
>
> You don't have to post 3 times!
>
> --
> Ian Collins

ok, i have a little problem with my browser.........now i have solved,
i hope.....