«

Will this be the beginning of the end for the the EOS full frame? Are we
going to see 4k studio/movie mirrorless at the november presentation. Is
Canon gonna copy the Leica S2 format? There are questions!

--
moved files are either renamed or copied and destroyed

--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to ---

On Oct 18, 10:56*am, android <h...@there.was> wrote:
> Will this be the beginning of the end for the the EOS full frame? Are we
> going to see 4k studio/movie mirrorless at the november presentation. Is
> Canon gonna copy the Leica S2 format? There are questions!
>
> --
> moved files are either renamed or copied and destroyed
>
> --- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to n...@netfront.net ---

God I hope FF in its current format DIES. Away with 3:2, on to 4:3.

RichA <> wrote:
>On Oct 18, 10:56*am, android <h...@there.was> wrote:
>> Will this be the beginning of the end for the the EOS full frame? Are we
>> going to see 4k studio/movie mirrorless at the november presentation. Is
>> Canon gonna copy the Leica S2 format? There are questions!
>>
>> --
>> moved files are either renamed or copied and destroyed
>>
>> --- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to n...@netfront.net ---
>
>God I hope FF in its current format DIES. Away with 3:2, on to 4:3.


Don't be silly. It ain't gonna happen.

The Leica S2 is 3:2, by the way.

"RichA" <> wrote in message
news:5b380064-71d9-449d-8463-...
[]
> God I hope FF in its current format DIES. Away with 3:2, on to 4:3.

Don't you mean move up to 16:9?

David

"David J Taylor" <david-> wrote:
>"RichA" <> wrote in message
>news:5b380064-71d9-449d-8463-...
>[]
>> God I hope FF in its current format DIES. Away with 3:2, on to 4:3.
>
>Don't you mean move up to 16:9?


Now that's a good idea!

My partner uses a Panasonic FZ38 superzoom, but the previous camera
was a Panasonic LUMIX DMC-LX2. It was a delight to use, with an ultra
wide angle (and ultra sharp) Leica branded zoom lens plus a 16:9 10 MP
sensor and rear LCD screen.

Alas, the 16:9 sensor was dropped for the subsequent LX3 and LX5 in
favour of a !0 MP 4:3 sensor.

On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:08:50 +0100, Bruce <> wrote:
: "David J Taylor" <david-> wrote:
: >"RichA" <> wrote in message
: >news:5b380064-71d9-449d-8463-...
: >[]
: >> God I hope FF in its current format DIES. Away with 3:2, on to 4:3.
: >
: >Don't you mean move up to 16:9?
:
:
: Now that's a good idea!

I don't think so. In portrait orientation it would be useful only for
photographing cell towers and flagpoles.

Bob

In article <4e9e26a4$0$13392$> , Trevor
<> wrote:

> > Don't you mean move up to 16:9?
>
> Why, you only want to look at your photo's on a TV screen? What happens
> with portrait format?

turn the tv on its side.

"RichA" <> wrote in message
news:5b380064-71d9-449d-8463-...
>God I hope FF in its current format DIES. Away with 3:2, on to 4:3.

Good luck with your quest to get every photo kiosk in the world to drop
6"x4" prints in favour of 5.33"x4"!

Trevor.

"David J Taylor" <david-> wrote in message
news:j7kfpr$6jm$...
> "RichA" <> wrote in message
> news:5b380064-71d9-449d-8463-...
> []
>> God I hope FF in its current format DIES. Away with 3:2, on to 4:3.
>
> Don't you mean move up to 16:9?

Why, you only want to look at your photo's on a TV screen? What happens
with portrait format?

Trevor.

"nospam" <> wrote in message
news:181020111839527545%...
>> > Don't you mean move up to 16:9?
>>
>> Why, you only want to look at your photo's on a TV screen? What happens
>> with portrait format?
>
> turn the tv on its side.

Gets a bit tedious when you have a mixture of portrait and landscape!

Trevor.