Evertjan. wrote:
> Bob Barrows [MVP] wrote on 30 dec 2005 in
> microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general:
>
>> Kyle Peterson wrote:
>>> you don't debug classic asp using a debugger..
>>
>> Actually, if you're lucky (and make the proper sacrifices) you can
>> debug server-side code with Visual Interdev. I had it working for
>> awhile... but then it stopped working and I could never make it work
>> again. It's very susceptible to FrontPage Server Extensions
>> conflicts.
>>
>
> Visual Interdev and Frontpage
Not FrontPage: FrontPage server extensions.
> are often used by people that don't
> want to learn indepth ASP, and therefore wish for automatic debugging.
Maybe so, but the desire for debugging and the abiltiy to write "indepth
ASP" are not contradictory.
>
> Experience learns that automatic debugging is impossible,
Not so. When it works, the Interdev debugger provides this. It's keeping it
working that's the issue...
> debugging needs manual breakpoints
And I'm telling you that when it works, Interdev provides a full-fledged
debugger: breakpoints, watches, call stacks, Immediate window, everything
one would expect from a debugger.
> and a good knowledge of a language.
> A debugger could detect syntax failures, but the larger part of bugs
> are logical errors that only show at runtime and depend on the
> external input.
>
> Simple, clean and straight forward programming code, which the above
> progrmmes don't give,
Maybe they don't "give" it, but they don't prevent it either when used by a
knowledgeable programmer.
> is a prerequisite for a good working and
> maintainable code.
True.
--
Microsoft MVP - ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. This email account is my spam trap so I
don't check it very often. If you must reply off-line, then remove the
"NO SPAM"