«

I have been using ASP for a few years now. For the most part I have been
able to make it do what I need for it to do. Is there a reason I might want
to be learning ASPX? Can someone point out some of the general differences
between ASP and ASPX?

Thank you in advance,
Michaaael

ASPX or ASP.Net is a completely different programming model. From my
experience the main difference is that in ASP it is hard to develop
big/complex applications unless using DCOM components written in one of the
Visual Studio 6.0 languages (VB or C++).

ASP.Net allow you to develop big web applications in C#, VB or C++ without
having to suffer the DCOM performance penalty, and with full support of the
..Net IDE, and >net applications are easier to deploy than DCOM components.

My recomendation is that if you do not have more than a few hundreds lines
of code to write, you can continue using ASP, but if you start counting in
thousands of lines start thinking about .Net.

Elie Grouchko

"michaaal" <> wrote in message
news:...
> I have been using ASP for a few years now. For the most part I have been
> able to make it do what I need for it to do. Is there a reason I might
want
> to be learning ASPX? Can someone point out some of the general
differences
> between ASP and ASPX?
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Michaaael
>
>
>

michaaal wrote:
> I have been using ASP for a few years now. For the most part I have
> been able to make it do what I need for it to do. Is there a reason
> I might want to be learning ASPX? Can someone point out some of the
> general differences between ASP and ASPX?
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Michaaael
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=AS...=1&sa=N&tab=wg

Bob Barrows
--
Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.

ASP.net is compiled code so theoretically its supposed to be fatser
than classic asp. One thing that I have noticed and heard from
numerous sources is all the hard stuff you've had to do in ASP (i.e dB
connections , form controls etc) have been made much much much easier
to use. It is these performance enhancements to the common every day
crap I have to deal with that has prompted me to start learning about
asp.net

Bastard


On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 09:16:56 -0400, "Bob Barrows [MVP]"
<> wrote:

>michaaal wrote:
>> I have been using ASP for a few years now. For the most part I have
>> been able to make it do what I need for it to do. Is there a reason
>> I might want to be learning ASPX? Can someone point out some of the
>> general differences between ASP and ASPX?
>>
>> Thank you in advance,
>> Michaaael
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=AS...=1&sa=N&tab=wg
>
>Bob Barrows

"Bã§TãRÐ" <> wrote in message
news:...
> ASP.net is compiled code so theoretically its supposed to be fatser
> than classic asp. One thing that I have noticed and heard from
> numerous sources is all the hard stuff you've had to do in ASP (i.e dB
> connections , form controls etc) have been made much much much easier
> to use. It is these performance enhancements to the common every day
> crap I have to deal with that has prompted me to start learning about
> asp.net
>
> Bastard
>
>
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 09:16:56 -0400, "Bob Barrows [MVP]"
> <> wrote:
>
> >michaaal wrote:
> >> I have been using ASP for a few years now. For the most part I have
> >> been able to make it do what I need for it to do. Is there a reason
> >> I might want to be learning ASPX? Can someone point out some of the
> >> general differences between ASP and ASPX?
> >>
> >> Thank you in advance,
> >> Michaaael
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=AS...e=UTF-8&c2coff
=1&sa=N&tab=wg
> >
> >Bob Barrows
>

Thanks Guys.