Re: mozilla vs Firebird

In article <bd47ir$i64$>,
says...
> I am sure this has been asked many times .... I currently use mozilla
> 1.3, and have no issues or problems with it. I have managed to convert
> the rest of my family to using it instead of IE.
>
> However I am temped by Firebird .... should I install that ??????
>
>
My personal preference is definitely (note the correct spelling!)
Firebird. Not so much for the browser proper, although the gui
is well thought out, but for the available extensions.
I don't think I could live without "Flash Click-to-view" and
"Nuke Image" among others. As far as I can tell, those don't
work for Mozilla's browser.

Gunther

Gunther wrote:

> My personal preference is definitely (note the correct spelling!)
> Firebird. Not so much for the browser proper, although the gui
> is well thought out, but for the available extensions.
> I don't think I could live without "Flash Click-to-view" and
> "Nuke Image" among others. As far as I can tell, those don't
> work for Mozilla's browser.

Have you tried XUL Prefbar 2 in Mozilla?
http://www.xulplanet.com/downloads/prefbar/

You can enable/disable images, custom css, javascript.
On some pages you can also "kill flash" .

--Irmen