John,
Awesome information. Thank you so much for your insight. Based on your
direction, .NET Remoting seems to be what I need so I'm headed in that
direction now. The 3rd party .dll is a somewhat old C++ .dll.
Again, thanks for your insight.
John
"John Saunders [MVP]" <john.saunders at trizetto.com> wrote in message
news:...
> "John Granade @GTSolutions.us>" <John<nospam> wrote in message
> news:1C949F8E-A860-4469-8222-...
>>I have a 3rd party .dll that makes and keeps a connection to their server.
>>They offer a web service but for high volume transactions they offer this
>>.dll where you initially open the connection and then just keep using that
>>connection for all subsequent calls. I'm trying to leverage that in our
>>web service but I can't figure out how to have that 'shared' instance of
>>their dll. I thought I might could put it in the global.asax and just
>>load it in the application_start but I'm missing how to expose that
>>instance of the object to my web service and asp.net pages that need to
>>access it.
>>
>> What's the right way to initiate this object once and then have
>> subsequent web services and web pages use that object going forward?
>
> I would create a small Windows Service to host the third party DLL and to
> expose its features through .NET Remoting. If you've never done it before,
> it's very easy to create a Windows Service. Visual Studio will basically
> create the infrastructure for you.
>
> This will allow you to concentrate on the issues involved with managing
> the access to this DLL by multiple callers. In particular, you need to
> find out from the third party whether their DLL is thread safe. Not only
> whether they _say_ it's thread-safe, but whether they've really _tested_
> it on multi-CPU systems. This is not always the case.
>
> If you have any doubts about the safety of this DLL, you will have to code
> your service so that only a single request can be processed at a time. You
> may also need to ensure that all access to this DLL occurs on a single
> thread.
>
> I have experience with third party code that claims to be thread safe, but
> is not. In the case I'm thinking of, the company had not actually tested
> their product as called by an ASP.NET web service. I suggest you either
> make sure that it has been properly tested, or else protect yourself in
> case it has not been!
>
> Good Luck!
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> John Saunders | MVP - Windows Server System - Connected System Developer
>
>
|