«

Hi,
I want to clarify one thing regarding running long running web method
asynchronously.

I am having one web method with is executing one stored procedure.

This stored procedure is long running may be taking couple of hours.

So want i want is once client has invoke this method asynchronosuly, if if
my client(i.e windows application) is close it should be in running state.

This is working fine.

But my question is will be create any resource leaks or memory leaks if
client has closed before web request completed.

If yes then please tell me alternative for this, i.e how to start
asynchronous web method irrespective of clients availablity once client has
invoked this.

Please correct me if i am wrong.

Thanks in advance.

You could splitt it into 2 different methods one for starting the long
running activity and getting a result ID from the DB, an other one for
looking if the long runner has completed using the ID and if has finished,
getting the result.
Polling for the second methode with a timer, and storing the result to a
result table would make the whole thing total independent from any user
side condition.
The result table could be very simple with ID, bool isReady and a result
field of the data type You want to get (like table_name for a temp result
table)

"Archana" <> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news49EBCD5-1A45-4976-8B7A-...
> Hi,
> I want to clarify one thing regarding running long running web method
> asynchronously.
>
> I am having one web method with is executing one stored procedure.
>
> This stored procedure is long running may be taking couple of hours.
>
> So want i want is once client has invoke this method asynchronosuly, if if
> my client(i.e windows application) is close it should be in running state.
>
> This is working fine.
>
> But my question is will be create any resource leaks or memory leaks if
> client has closed before web request completed.
>
> If yes then please tell me alternative for this, i.e how to start
> asynchronous web method irrespective of clients availablity once client
> has
> invoked this.
>
> Please correct me if i am wrong.
>
> Thanks in advance.