«

The parent company where I work like to use a methodology popularized by
Fusebox, for web application development. Fusebox, from what I have been
able to gather, is best suited to Cold Fusion. I've checked Fusebox's
website (www.fusebox.org), and even they claim that the current fusebox will
not work for ASP.NET. Of course, I want to use ASP.NET (we have other
ASP.NET applications we wrote some time ago), but I also want to have a
robust ASP.NET application, such as following a methodology like fusebox
would provide.

Therefore, my question is, what development methodology should I follow,
which will be standardized like fusebox is, and more compatible with
ASP.NET?

Rod

Microsoft has a User Interface Process Application Block that looks
interesting:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en...a/html/uip.asp

-Jason

Rod wrote:

> The parent company where I work like to use a methodology popularized by
> Fusebox, for web application development. Fusebox, from what I have been
> able to gather, is best suited to Cold Fusion. I've checked Fusebox's
> website (www.fusebox.org), and even they claim that the current fusebox will
> not work for ASP.NET. Of course, I want to use ASP.NET (we have other
> ASP.NET applications we wrote some time ago), but I also want to have a
> robust ASP.NET application, such as following a methodology like fusebox
> would provide.
>
> Therefore, my question is, what development methodology should I follow,
> which will be standardized like fusebox is, and more compatible with
> ASP.NET?
>
> Rod
>
>