After all this feedback... here is my 2 cents.
I've been working with VS2002 since beta, and now I'm on VS2003. My opinion is
that while HTML editor from VS.NET is not has good as Dreamweaver for example,
the fact is that coding in VS is much better. I code mostly in vb.net and its
amazing the productivity that you get from using vs.net.
The ideal solution for me would be to have Dreamweaver as HTML editor and VS2003
for coding. But that is just too time consuming and does not worth the trouble
in my point of view.
Things said, I've got used to the limitations of the vs.net html editor and I
only use code-behind currently. Sometimes I still go to dreamweaver where I do
some HTML de design and then just copy+past the HTML into vs.net.
At the end of the day, VS.NET is not that bad. Could be much better on the HTML
side, thats true, but still its a highly productive dev enviroment.
Cumprimentos / Regards
Joao Cardoso (MVP dotNET)
================================================== =====
Visite os grupos de discussão portugueses:
microsoft.public.pt.vsnet
microsoft.public.pt.dotnet
microsoft.public.pt.*
[LusoCoders]-
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lusocoders/
[PontoNetPT]-
http://www.pontonetpt.com
.n.o-s.p-a.m -
www.acinet.pt
================================================== =====