Okay, Alan, good enough. But tell me this: When you DID start using the .Net
SDK, did you still have to learn how to use it? Did putting off learning how
to use it make it any easier to learn? My point is, if you want to learn
something, you're going to have to work. Reading a book, while getting your
feet wet, is not going to prepare you to use the .Net SDK. Using the .Net
SDK is the only way. So, why put it off, since it is THE authoritative
reference?
If you want to get a book, well and good. But you should get the .Net SDK.
Not necessarly second, but ASAP. It is, after all, free. Eventually, it is
almost all you will use or need.
--
HTH,
Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
..Net Developer
Neither a follower nor a lender be.
"Alan Silver" <alan-> wrote in message
news:...
> >I should clarify that I'm not taking exception to the recommendation of a
>>book. A book is a good way to get your feet wet. However, the SDK is free,
>>comprehensive, and authoritative, which is not the case of any book about
>>.Net. In other words, if the SDK is free, why not have it as a reference
>>if
>>nothing else?
>
> Agreed 100%, I was just pointing out that a beginner could easily get put
> off by the SDK. I know my first experience of it put me off completely. I
> dropped the idea of ASP.NET for some time before coming back to it. I
> tried the SDK again and found it just as off-putting. I then got the book
> mentioned and found it wonderful. *Now* I can look at the SDK and have
> half an idea what it means 
>
> I also don't believe in putting weights on your feet, but equally I
> believe in starting with something you can handle.
>
>>I should mention that when I first started working with ASP.Net I DID buy
>>a
>>book on it, which I went through fairly quickly, and ever since have
>>relied
>>on the SDK.
>
> Which is sensible and reasonable advice.
>
>>Also, the only daunting aspect of the SDK is the language it uses, which
>>is
>>technical and precise. However, learning that language/syntax is
>>invaluable
>>to any developer.
>
> Agreed again.
>
> I don't think we are arguing here, I was just issuing a warning about
> expecting the SDK to be useful for a beginner, despite being free and
> comprehensive. As a second (and further) step, it can't be beaten.
>
> ta ra
>
> --
> Alan Silver
> (anything added below this line is nothing to do with me)