Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > ASP .Net > ASP .Net Web Controls > poor performance with treeview control

Reply
Thread Tools

poor performance with treeview control

 
 
Anton Stadler
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-23-2003
hello folks,

I impemented the treeview controll and it works correctly but it requires a
lot of CPU time at the server. With aprox 50 nodes in the tree it takes
about 2.5 seconds ( on a 2500MHz/512MByte machine ) to be built at the
server. I tryed to databind an xml file as well as building up the hole tree
by adding each node programmatically (this is surprisingly even a little bit
faster) but it always requires aprox 2.5 seconds.

Has anybody out there suffered the same problem or are there different
versions of webcontrols?
Does it make a difference which framework is running on the machine? (I use
1.1 at winXP)

Thank you

Anton


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Alvin Bruney
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-24-2003
basically, no. the tree control is not yet a perfect science. it has issues.
still what you are seeing falls withing the bounds of acceptable performance
"Anton Stadler" <anton.schamy_no_spam_@arcor.de> wrote in message
news:bi888p$eb9$06$...
> hello folks,
>
> I impemented the treeview controll and it works correctly but it requires

a
> lot of CPU time at the server. With aprox 50 nodes in the tree it takes
> about 2.5 seconds ( on a 2500MHz/512MByte machine ) to be built at the
> server. I tryed to databind an xml file as well as building up the hole

tree
> by adding each node programmatically (this is surprisingly even a little

bit
> faster) but it always requires aprox 2.5 seconds.
>
> Has anybody out there suffered the same problem or are there different
> versions of webcontrols?
> Does it make a difference which framework is running on the machine? (I

use
> 1.1 at winXP)
>
> Thank you
>
> Anton
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Hussein Ismail
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-28-2003
Hi Anton,

You say you only have 50 nodes.
Did use the a trace to check what is taking long to
render.
It could be the viewstate information.
Check that first.

Another thinkg you might want to conside is caching that
tree control. That will speed it up alot.

>-----Original Message-----
>hello folks,
>
>I impemented the treeview controll and it works

correctly but it requires a
>lot of CPU time at the server. With aprox 50 nodes in

the tree it takes
>about 2.5 seconds ( on a 2500MHz/512MByte machine ) to

be built at the
>server. I tryed to databind an xml file as well as

building up the hole tree
>by adding each node programmatically (this is

surprisingly even a little bit
>faster) but it always requires aprox 2.5 seconds.
>
>Has anybody out there suffered the same problem or are

there different
>versions of webcontrols?
>Does it make a difference which framework is running on

the machine? (I use
>1.1 at winXP)
>
>Thank you
>
> Anton
>
>
>.
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Alvin Bruney
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-29-2003
> Another thinkg you might want to conside is caching that
> tree control. That will speed it up alot.


be weary of caching the tree control. it wasn't made to be put in cache.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poor, poor P&S owner learns too late... Rich Digital Photography 66 06-11-2009 04:48 AM
Poor reception, poor connection, and dropped signal =?Utf-8?B?dW51c3VhbHBzeWNobw==?= Wireless Networking 2 06-07-2006 12:54 AM
7206 VXR poor performance in LAN hari Cisco 2 03-28-2005 01:49 AM
ASP.NET Poor performance with long-running COM object calls =?Utf-8?B?QmlsbCBUaG9ybmU=?= ASP .Net 4 11-15-2004 05:42 PM
Poor outgoing performance Jerry Bacon Cisco 3 02-24-2004 03:07 PM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57