«

They review 3 printers (lack of new cameras takes its toll) and a
Canon beats Epson and HP. Then, two big Canon ad banners appear on
the site. What a coincidence! Maybe Dpreview isn't the cash-cow
Amazon thought it would be?

On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:00:19 -0700 (PDT), RichA <>
wrote:

>They review 3 printers (lack of new cameras takes its toll) and a
>Canon beats Epson and HP. Then, two big Canon ad banners appear on
>the site. What a coincidence! Maybe Dpreview isn't the cash-cow
>Amazon thought it would be?

I saw an ancestry.com ad on the front page. I'm guessing the Mormons
are behind it all.

I see you're still obsessed mate :O)

On 23/07/2011 03:40, John A. wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:00:19 -0700 (PDT), RichA<>
> wrote:
>
>> They review 3 printers (lack of new cameras takes its toll) and a
>> Canon beats Epson and HP. Then, two big Canon ad banners appear on
>> the site. What a coincidence! Maybe Dpreview isn't the cash-cow
>> Amazon thought it would be?
>
> I saw an ancestry.com ad on the front page. I'm guessing the Mormons
> are behind it all.

it was the immigants. even when it was the bears I knew it was the immigants

In rec.photo.digital RichA <> wrote:
> They review 3 printers (lack of new cameras takes its toll) and a
> Canon beats Epson and HP. Then, two big Canon ad banners appear on
> the site. What a coincidence! Maybe Dpreview isn't the cash-cow
> Amazon thought it would be?

The most expensive printer turned out to be the best. Surely that's
not too surprising, even if it was made by Canon?

--
Chris Malcolm

Paul Heslop wrote:
>
> I see you're still obsessed mate :O)


Long time, no post, Paul!

Also, I see that you've finally abandoned Netscape "Communicator" 4.8,
in favor of "Thunderbird" 3.1.11. I'm still loyal to the former (for
e-mail and Usenet), personally.

Yet, recently, I've been trying "SeaMonkey" (version 2.0.11), as a
Web browser. Like Google "Chrome" (mine is 12.0.742.122), it's rather
faster than Microsoft "Interner Explorer" (ver .

Each of these three browsers has its own idiosyncracies, including
strengths and weaknesses. It would be great, if somebody decided to
learn from this, in order to create the perfect program.

--
Cordially,
John Turco <>

Marie's Musings <http://fairiesandtails.blogspot.com>

On 7/28/2011 11:32 PM, John Turco wrote:
> Paul Heslop wrote:
>>
>> I see you're still obsessed mate :O)
>
>
> Long time, no post, Paul!
>
> Also, I see that you've finally abandoned Netscape "Communicator" 4.8,
> in favor of "Thunderbird" 3.1.11. I'm still loyal to the former (for
> e-mail and Usenet), personally.
>
> Yet, recently, I've been trying "SeaMonkey" (version 2.0.11), as a
> Web browser. Like Google "Chrome" (mine is 12.0.742.122), it's rather
> faster than Microsoft "Interner Explorer" (ver .
>
> Each of these three browsers has its own idiosyncracies, including
> strengths and weaknesses. It would be great, if somebody decided to
> learn from this, in order to create the perfect program.
>

Any developer who did that, would soon be out of a job.

--
Peter