Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > Python > Re: Python's super() considered super!

Reply
Thread Tools

Re: Python's super() considered super!

 
 
Michele Simionato
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-27-2011
On Friday, May 27, 2011 10:49:52 AM UTC+2, Ben Finney wrote:
> The exquisite care that you describe programmers needing to maintain is IMO
> just as much a deterrent as the super-is-harmful essay.


Worth quoting. Also I think this article may encourage naive programmers along the dark path of cooperative multiple inheritance, when they could instead use better designs.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT: What is considered "trivia" facts about GigE? Nocturnal MCSE 104 12-02-2005 10:48 PM
HTML Considered evil, but why? William W. Plummer Firefox 8 02-10-2005 03:01 AM
Accumulated CACMs (since 1966) Considered Dangerous: you want? (free,OfCourse) David Combs Java 0 07-08-2004 01:50 AM
What is considered orthodox? Woody Splawn ASP .Net 4 05-08-2004 07:09 AM
Why are JSP tags considered as being less logic than scriplets ReplyToNewsgroup_NoSpamWanted@bahnhofbredband.se Java 4 11-26-2003 05:40 AM



Advertisments