«

On 5/13/2011 6:05 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
> "tony cooper"<> wrote in message
> news...
>> On Fri, 13 May 2011 12:20:24 -0400, "Neil Harrington"<>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> My point was that they clearly intended no offense to Hillary or to any
>>> other women.
>>
>> You are such a hypocrite. When anyone else says something that can't
>> be verified by 17 sources and a Supreme Court judge, you accuse them
>> of suppositioning. Yet, you can baldly state that they clearly
>> intended no offense.
>
> OK, prove me wrong. What offense did they intend?
>
>>
>> Well, I don't know what they *intended*,
>
> Ohhhhhh . . . gosh, what a shame.
>
>> but what they did was
>> offensive in that they portrayed to their readership that females have
>> no place in a man's world in our world just as it is in their world.
>
> Horse ****. You've just said you don't know what they intended, and now
> you've foisted off on them *your* paranoid notions of what they meant. You
> were right the first time and you should have left it at that.
>
>>
>>> Well, Gates on the far right. But if Mullen or Biden, etc., had been
>>> removed
>> >from the photo, leaving the others, would it really change the sense of
>>> the
>>> picture in any significant way?
>>
>> It could present the sense that Obama does not value his Secretary of
>> State enough to include her in the group. In politics, that is a
>> significant indicator.
>
> Not responsive to what I asked, was it? But you're wrong anyway.
>
> The Hasidic Jewish newspaper offered their own explanation, which seems
> reasonable to me given their Hasidic way of looking at these things. It had
> nothing whatever to do with any supposed "indicator" of how Obama values
> Hillary.
>
> Get tweezers, reach into an ear and pull all that paranoid stuffing out of
> your head, Tony. If the intent were to suggest any such thing as Obama's low
> opinion by erasing Hillary, then why did they also erase the other woman in
> the photo (who is completely unknown, as far as I'm aware)? Do you think
> they were trying to suggest Obama's devaluing of her also, the poor
> unidentified creature? Don't you think it's infinitely more likely that the
> paper's reason for the Hillaryectomy was exactly what they said it was, that
> they consider themselves "not allowed" to show pictures of women for reasons
> of modesty?
>
> Don't you ever think these things through before posting such utter rubbish?
>
>>
>>
>>> "Bizarre" and "unreasonable" are often matters of point of view. In the
>>> case
>>> of images, religious Jews (and maybe Muslims too) have certain views that
>>> others do not; for example, Jews do not depict religious figures as
>>> Christians do. While Christians have pictures of Jesus, Mary et al. in
>>> books, portraits, statues and statuettes of Jesus all over the place; Jews
>>> NEVER do this in connection with Abraham, Moses or other Biblical
>>> characters, since they believe it violates the ban against making graven
>>> images. I'm not saying this is directly connected to the Hasidic
>>> newspaper's
>>> refusal to print photos of women, but it does suggest that they attach
>>> some
>>> moral imperatives to pictures that others do not.
>>
>> You don't grasp that Hasidic Judaism is a branch of Orthodox Judaism,
>> and Orthodox Judaism is significantly different in customs from Reform
>> Judaism. You lump all Jews together with your "they". There's an
>> ignorance and distastefulness about that.
>
> This, from the bananahead who assigns all sorts of evil motives to Hasidic
> Jewish newspaper editors, based on nothing but his own paranoia, ignorance
> and witlessness, as demonstrated. Sheesh.


The fact that he speaks the truth is something that you ignore. The
issue has absolutely nothing to do with Israel.

--
Peter

On 5/13/2011 6:08 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
> "PeterN"<> wrote in message
> news:4dcd8e1c$0$12507$...
>> On 5/13/2011 2:10 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
>>> "PeterN"<> wrote in message
>>> news:4dcd51f8$0$12466$...
>>>> On 5/13/2011 9:11 AM, RichA wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> They are liars. No way this was just a little mistake of lack of
>>>>> forethought. No one is that stupid. Like everything else, Israeli
>>>>> official bodies do some outrageous things, and because the U.S.
>>>>> politicians are always too timid to say anthing, criticism from other
>>>>> quarters rolls off them like water off a duck's back.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your ignorant prejudice continually shows.
>>>> Although there are members of the Hassidic community living in Israel,
>>>> the
>>>> vast majority lives in the United States and Canada. They do not
>>>> recognize
>>>> the State of Israel as a Jewish State.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ce4IuSBRn9w
>>>
>>> And it's not just Hasidic Jews who are anti-Zionist.
>>>
>>> See the Jews Against Zionism site,
>>> http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/
>>>
>>> Good on them.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Your comment shows a complete ignorance of the true meaning of Zionism,
>> before it's meaning was corrupted by anti-Semitic types.
>
> And the anti-Zionist Orthodox and Hasidic Jewish rabbis, are they
> "anti-Semitic types" too?

You don't even begin to comprehend the meaning of a Jewish State, which
is what they oppose, because one cannot be established until the coming
of the Messiah. This fundamentalist meaning coincides with the Christian
concept of Judgment day. One of the major differences is that from the
Hassidic standpoint the Messiah must precede the Jewish State.

If you have any desire to understand the true meaning of Zionism, read
the works of Theodore Herzl. if you do so you will find that although
Israel would be a Jewish State in the sense that all Jewish people would
automatically become citizens, it would also be secular in operation and
would include a place for both Jews and Arabs to live peacefully together.


--
Peter

Here is another version of the photo in question.

<http://www.slate.com/id/2293232/slideshow/2293228/entry/2293222/fs/0//>


And yet another version of the place of women in history:


<http://madartlab.com/2011/05/10/hillary-clinton-erased-from-history-not-so-fast/>

--
Peter

Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>On 2011-05-13 14:47:18 -0700, Bruce <> said:
>> Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>> On 2011-05-13 08:02:28 -0700, Bruce <> said:
>>>> Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> They probably
>>>>> edited Congalisa Rice from similar cabinet and high level meeting shots
>>>>> of the GWB administration.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Who ??????
>>>
>>> My typo.
>>> Condaleezza Rice, G. W. Bush's female National Security Advisor, and
>>> Secretary of State.
>>
>>
>> Condoleeza. An interesting name.
>>
>> According to Wikipedia:
>> Her name, Condoleezza, derives from the music-related term, con
>> dolcezza, which in Italian means, "with sweetness".
>>
>> Seems like her parents also found it difficult to spell right.
>
>That is considering that both her parents were high school teachers.
>...and therein lies the problem with education in the USA today.


It is just as bad here in England.

On Fri, 13 May 2011 18:05:14 -0400, "Neil Harrington" <>
wrote:

>
>"tony cooper" <> wrote in message
>news.. .
>> On Fri, 13 May 2011 12:20:24 -0400, "Neil Harrington" <>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>My point was that they clearly intended no offense to Hillary or to any
>>>other women.
>>
>> You are such a hypocrite. When anyone else says something that can't
>> be verified by 17 sources and a Supreme Court judge, you accuse them
>> of suppositioning. Yet, you can baldly state that they clearly
>> intended no offense.
>
>OK, prove me wrong. What offense did they intend?
>
>>
>> Well, I don't know what they *intended*,
>
>Ohhhhhh . . . gosh, what a shame.
>
>> but what they did was
>> offensive in that they portrayed to their readership that females have
>> no place in a man's world in our world just as it is in their world.
>
>Horse ****. You've just said you don't know what they intended, and now
>you've foisted off on them *your* paranoid notions of what they meant. You
>were right the first time and you should have left it at that.
>
You don't know the difference between what was intended and what the
result was. I don't know what was intended, but I do know what the
result was.

How you can read that I implied or stated that I had the slightest
idea of their intent or the meaning to them of what they did is beyond
me.

>
>The Hasidic Jewish newspaper offered their own explanation, which seems
>reasonable to me given their Hasidic way of looking at these things. It had
>nothing whatever to do with any supposed "indicator" of how Obama values
>Hillary.

Again, you confuse intent with results.

To make it simple enough for you to grasp, injury may not be the
intent when a car crashes into another car, but it can be the result.

>This, from the bananahead who assigns all sorts of evil motives to Hasidic
>Jewish newspaper editors, based on nothing but his own paranoia, ignorance
>and witlessness, as demonstrated. Sheesh.

I don't believe, and never indicated that I believe, that there was
any maliciousness on the part of the newspaper editors. No evil
motives. However, the result of what they did was offensive and
demeaning.

Most offensive actions are the result of not thinking through one's
actions or comments, not intent to offend.


--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

RichA <> wrote:
>On May 13, 12:33*am, tony cooper <tony_cooper...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Di Tzeitung is a newspaper. *As a matter of fact, Di Tzeitung has
>> issued an apology to the White House saying: *"We should not have
>> published the altered picture, and we have conveyed our regrets and
>> apologies to the White House and to the State Department." *They've
>> listened to the views. *
>
>They are liars. No way this was just a little mistake of lack of
>forethought. No one is that stupid. Like everything else, Israeli
>official bodies do some outrageous things, and because the U.S.
>politicians are always too timid to say anthing, criticism from other
>quarters rolls off them like water off a duck's back.

"No one is that stupid" except, perhaps, for some dumbass who didn't
notice that the newspaper is produced in Brooklyn.

--
Ray Fischer | Mendocracy (n.) government by lying
| The new GOP ideal

On 5/13/2011 8:46 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
> "PeterN"<> wrote in message
> news:4dcdb30a$0$12491$...
>> On 5/13/2011 6:08 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
>>> "PeterN"<> wrote in message
>>> news:4dcd8e1c$0$12507$...
>>>> On 5/13/2011 2:10 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
>>>>> "PeterN"<> wrote in message
>>>>> news:4dcd51f8$0$12466$...
>>>>>> On 5/13/2011 9:11 AM, RichA wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They are liars. No way this was just a little mistake of lack of
>>>>>>> forethought. No one is that stupid. Like everything else, Israeli
>>>>>>> official bodies do some outrageous things, and because the U.S.
>>>>>>> politicians are always too timid to say anthing, criticism from other
>>>>>>> quarters rolls off them like water off a duck's back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your ignorant prejudice continually shows.
>>>>>> Although there are members of the Hassidic community living in Israel,
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> vast majority lives in the United States and Canada. They do not
>>>>>> recognize
>>>>>> the State of Israel as a Jewish State.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ce4IuSBRn9w
>>>>>
>>>>> And it's not just Hasidic Jews who are anti-Zionist.
>>>>>
>>>>> See the Jews Against Zionism site,
>>>>> http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> Good on them.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your comment shows a complete ignorance of the true meaning of Zionism,
>>>> before it's meaning was corrupted by anti-Semitic types.
>>>
>>> And the anti-Zionist Orthodox and Hasidic Jewish rabbis, are they
>>> "anti-Semitic types" too?
>>
>> You don't even begin to comprehend the meaning of a Jewish State, which is
>> what they oppose, because one cannot be established until the coming of
>> the Messiah. This fundamentalist meaning coincides with the Christian
>> concept of Judgment day. One of the major differences is that from the
>> Hassidic standpoint the Messiah must precede the Jewish State.
>>
>> If you have any desire to understand the true meaning of Zionism, read the
>> works of Theodore Herzl. if you do so you will find that although Israel
>> would be a Jewish State in the sense that all Jewish people would
>> automatically become citizens, it would also be secular in operation and
>> would include a place for both Jews and Arabs to live peacefully together.
>
> Obviously a nonsensical notion if there ever was one, in light of the way
> the Jewish state was founded in 1948 and has been run ever since.
>
> In any case by your definition the present state of Israel has no connection
> whatever with Herzlian Zionism, making that reference irrelevant. So don't
> tell me *I* "don't even begin to comprehend the meaning of a Jewish State,"
> explain it all to Netanyahu. (Like he's going to pay any attention to you
> and your Herzl style Zionist ideas.)
>
>

It would never occur to you that current Israeli actions are a reaction
to rockets being launched, Bar Mitzvah services being bombed, public
buses carrying civilians being attacked. No, of course not. Tell your
friends, whose actions you seem to condone, to stop the bombing and see
what happens.


--
Peter

On 5/13/2011 8:46 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
> "PeterN"<> wrote in message
> news:4dcdb30a$0$12491$...
>> On 5/13/2011 6:08 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
>>> "PeterN"<> wrote in message
>>> news:4dcd8e1c$0$12507$...
>>>> On 5/13/2011 2:10 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
>>>>> "PeterN"<> wrote in message
>>>>> news:4dcd51f8$0$12466$...
>>>>>> On 5/13/2011 9:11 AM, RichA wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They are liars. No way this was just a little mistake of lack of
>>>>>>> forethought. No one is that stupid. Like everything else, Israeli
>>>>>>> official bodies do some outrageous things, and because the U.S.
>>>>>>> politicians are always too timid to say anthing, criticism from other
>>>>>>> quarters rolls off them like water off a duck's back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your ignorant prejudice continually shows.
>>>>>> Although there are members of the Hassidic community living in Israel,
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> vast majority lives in the United States and Canada. They do not
>>>>>> recognize
>>>>>> the State of Israel as a Jewish State.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ce4IuSBRn9w
>>>>>
>>>>> And it's not just Hasidic Jews who are anti-Zionist.
>>>>>
>>>>> See the Jews Against Zionism site,
>>>>> http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> Good on them.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your comment shows a complete ignorance of the true meaning of Zionism,
>>>> before it's meaning was corrupted by anti-Semitic types.
>>>
>>> And the anti-Zionist Orthodox and Hasidic Jewish rabbis, are they
>>> "anti-Semitic types" too?
>>
>> You don't even begin to comprehend the meaning of a Jewish State, which is
>> what they oppose, because one cannot be established until the coming of
>> the Messiah. This fundamentalist meaning coincides with the Christian
>> concept of Judgment day. One of the major differences is that from the
>> Hassidic standpoint the Messiah must precede the Jewish State.
>>
>> If you have any desire to understand the true meaning of Zionism, read the
>> works of Theodore Herzl. if you do so you will find that although Israel
>> would be a Jewish State in the sense that all Jewish people would
>> automatically become citizens, it would also be secular in operation and
>> would include a place for both Jews and Arabs to live peacefully together.
>
> Obviously a nonsensical notion if there ever was one, in light of the way
> the Jewish state was founded in 1948 and has been run ever since.
>

Right. Immediately upon its founding it attacked Egypt, Jordan and
Syria, while rejecting the partition plan.

WTF do you smoke.

--
Peter

On Sat, 14 May 2011 12:49:58 -0400, PeterN
<> wrote:

>On 5/13/2011 8:46 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
>> "PeterN"<> wrote in message
>> news:4dcdb30a$0$12491$...
>>> On 5/13/2011 6:08 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
>>>> "PeterN"<> wrote in message
>>>> news:4dcd8e1c$0$12507$...
>>>>> On 5/13/2011 2:10 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
>>>>>> "PeterN"<> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:4dcd51f8$0$12466$...
>>>>>>> On 5/13/2011 9:11 AM, RichA wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They are liars. No way this was just a little mistake of lack of
>>>>>>>> forethought. No one is that stupid. Like everything else, Israeli
>>>>>>>> official bodies do some outrageous things, and because the U.S.
>>>>>>>> politicians are always too timid to say anthing, criticism from other
>>>>>>>> quarters rolls off them like water off a duck's back.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your ignorant prejudice continually shows.
>>>>>>> Although there are members of the Hassidic community living in Israel,
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> vast majority lives in the United States and Canada. They do not
>>>>>>> recognize
>>>>>>> the State of Israel as a Jewish State.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ce4IuSBRn9w
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And it's not just Hasidic Jews who are anti-Zionist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See the Jews Against Zionism site,
>>>>>> http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good on them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Your comment shows a complete ignorance of the true meaning of Zionism,
>>>>> before it's meaning was corrupted by anti-Semitic types.
>>>>
>>>> And the anti-Zionist Orthodox and Hasidic Jewish rabbis, are they
>>>> "anti-Semitic types" too?
>>>
>>> You don't even begin to comprehend the meaning of a Jewish State, which is
>>> what they oppose, because one cannot be established until the coming of
>>> the Messiah. This fundamentalist meaning coincides with the Christian
>>> concept of Judgment day. One of the major differences is that from the
>>> Hassidic standpoint the Messiah must precede the Jewish State.
>>>
>>> If you have any desire to understand the true meaning of Zionism, read the
>>> works of Theodore Herzl. if you do so you will find that although Israel
>>> would be a Jewish State in the sense that all Jewish people would
>>> automatically become citizens, it would also be secular in operation and
>>> would include a place for both Jews and Arabs to live peacefully together.
>>
>> Obviously a nonsensical notion if there ever was one, in light of the way
>> the Jewish state was founded in 1948 and has been run ever since.
>>
>
>Right. Immediately upon its founding it attacked Egypt, Jordan and
>Syria, while rejecting the partition plan.
>
>WTF do you smoke.

I think we all have Neil pegged pretty well. Across the board.

--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

On 5/14/2011 5:20 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
> "PeterN"<> wrote in message
> news:4dceae8d$0$12505$...
>> On 5/13/2011 8:46 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
>>> "PeterN"<> wrote in message
>>> news:4dcdb30a$0$12491$...
>>>> On 5/13/2011 6:08 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
>>>>> "PeterN"<> wrote in message
>>>>> news:4dcd8e1c$0$12507$...
>>>>>> On 5/13/2011 2:10 PM, Neil Harrington wrote:
>>>>>>> "PeterN"<> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:4dcd51f8$0$12466$...
>>>>>>>> On 5/13/2011 9:11 AM, RichA wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They are liars. No way this was just a little mistake of lack of
>>>>>>>>> forethought. No one is that stupid. Like everything else, Israeli
>>>>>>>>> official bodies do some outrageous things, and because the U.S.
>>>>>>>>> politicians are always too timid to say anthing, criticism from
>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>> quarters rolls off them like water off a duck's back.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your ignorant prejudice continually shows.
>>>>>>>> Although there are members of the Hassidic community living in
>>>>>>>> Israel,
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> vast majority lives in the United States and Canada. They do not
>>>>>>>> recognize
>>>>>>>> the State of Israel as a Jewish State.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ce4IuSBRn9w
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And it's not just Hasidic Jews who are anti-Zionist.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See the Jews Against Zionism site,
>>>>>>> http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good on them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your comment shows a complete ignorance of the true meaning of
>>>>>> Zionism,
>>>>>> before it's meaning was corrupted by anti-Semitic types.
>>>>>
>>>>> And the anti-Zionist Orthodox and Hasidic Jewish rabbis, are they
>>>>> "anti-Semitic types" too?
>>>>
>>>> You don't even begin to comprehend the meaning of a Jewish State, which
>>>> is
>>>> what they oppose, because one cannot be established until the coming of
>>>> the Messiah. This fundamentalist meaning coincides with the Christian
>>>> concept of Judgment day. One of the major differences is that from the
>>>> Hassidic standpoint the Messiah must precede the Jewish State.
>>>>
>>>> If you have any desire to understand the true meaning of Zionism, read
>>>> the
>>>> works of Theodore Herzl. if you do so you will find that although Israel
>>>> would be a Jewish State in the sense that all Jewish people would
>>>> automatically become citizens, it would also be secular in operation and
>>>> would include a place for both Jews and Arabs to live peacefully
>>>> together.
>>>
>>> Obviously a nonsensical notion if there ever was one, in light of the way
>>> the Jewish state was founded in 1948 and has been run ever since.
>>>
>>> In any case by your definition the present state of Israel has no
>>> connection
>>> whatever with Herzlian Zionism, making that reference irrelevant. So
>>> don't
>>> tell me *I* "don't even begin to comprehend the meaning of a Jewish
>>> State,"
>>> explain it all to Netanyahu. (Like he's going to pay any attention to you
>>> and your Herzl style Zionist ideas.)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It would never occur to you that current Israeli actions are a reaction to
>> rockets being launched, Bar Mitzvah services being bombed, public buses
>> carrying civilians being attacked. No, of course not.
>
> Zionist terrorism worked for Zionists in 1948, didn't it. After their
> massacre of Arabs in the peaceful village of Deir Yassin, panicked
> Palestinians fled their homes by the thousands. Eventually some 700,000
> Palestinians either fled or were forcibly expelled from their homes --
> arguably the most successful example of "ethnic cleansing" of a territory in
> modern history.
>
> http://www.deiryassin.org/mas.html
>
> Look at a map of Israeli seized and illegally occupied territory today and
> compare it with the generous area the U.N. originally approved for a Jewish
> state:
>
> http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHART...tellstory.html
>
> Then you tell me who are the aggressors, the Zionists or the Palestinians.
>
>> Tell your friends, whose actions you seem to condone, to stop the bombing
>> and see what happens.
>
> I don't have any friends in that part of the world, but I can recognize
> injustice when I see it. Evidently you cannot.
>
> If there is one lesson the Palestinians took away from all this, it is that
> if terrorism can work for the Zionists it may eventually work for them too.
> In fact, they have no other choice available to them. They do not have the
> world's only superpower giving them billions of American taxpayers' dollars
> every year, or supplying them with vast quantities of hugely expensive and
> highly sophisticated weapons of war. They have home-made bombs and suicide
> bombers, the "poor man's air force." And they have time and demographics on
> their side.
>
> The Zionists who robbed, terrorized and murdered them evidently expected
> them to just go away and forget about being robbed of their homes and
> property. They have shown that they aren't going to do that.
>
> So the result is the situation we have today in that part of the world,
> massive and growing hatred of the United States for our part in all this.
> Without us the Zionists could never have succeeded in their crimes, which
> continue to this day. And everyone knows this.

Are you talking about the events of April 8, 1948.

Here is the time line leading to that sad happening:
Apr 2, 1948 - THE FACTS: DIR YASSIN MASSACRE: DIR YASSIN WAS A BASE OF
ATTACK BY THE ARABS AGAINST THE JERUSALEM/ TEL AVIV ROAD. " On April 2,
1948, the inhabitants of Deir Yassin began sniping at the Jewish
Quarters of Bet Hakerem and Yefe Nof. According to reports by the Shai
(Haganah Intelligence), fortifications were being constructed in the
village and a large quantity of arms being stockpiled. Several days
before the attack. ...

From FACTS ABOUT JERUSALEM - Related web pages
http://www.shalomjerusalem.com/jerus...rusalem74.html

Apr 6, 1948 - Operation Nachshon was launched on April 6, 1948, with
the aim of opening up the road to Jerusalem. The village of Deir Yassin
was included on the list of Arab villages to be occupied as part of that
operation. Indeed, while fierce fighting was going on at ...Operation
Nachshon was launched on April 6, 1948, with the aim of opening up the
road to Jerusalem. The village of Deir Yassin was included on the list
of Arab villages to be occupied as part of that operation. Indeed, while
fierce fighting was going on at Kastel, Arab reinforcements flooded onto
the battlefield through Deir Yassin, which helped to drive back the
Jewish occupying force.

Most here recognize that you never let facts overcome your prejudices.
This is a photography forum, or you would see a lot more. Stop spreading
your venomous lies. They have no place here.

--
Peter