«

Terrible! Just awful quality at f1.4-f2.8. I was shocked. Based on
the numbers, you'd be better off buying any old 50mm f1.4 manual lens
off Ebay at $60.00! Meanwhile, a slew of other Zeiss's they tested
were stunning, particularly the 100mm Makro which NASA claimed was the
best lens they ever tested.

On Mar 31, 11:51*am, Bruce <docnews2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> RichA <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Terrible! *Just awful quality at f1.4-f2.8. *I was shocked. *Basedon
> >the numbers, you'd be better off buying any old 50mm f1.4 manual lens
> >off Ebay at $60.00! *Meanwhile, a slew of other Zeiss's they tested
> >were stunning, particularly the 100mm Makro which NASA claimed was the
> >best lens they ever tested.
>
> In each case, a sample of 1. *Therein lies the problem, perhaps?

I doubt it. Since when does Zeiss release variable-quality products?