«

There's a new draft (N154 of the proposed C1X standard available on
the committee's web site. The text of this version is identical to the
previous version (N1539), but the diff marks are against the final C99
standard (N1256), which makes it easier to see what's new.

<http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1548.pdf>
--
Larry Jones

Geez, I gotta have a REASON for everything? -- Calvin

writes:

> There's a new draft (N154 of the proposed C1X standard available on
> the committee's web site. The text of this version is identical to the
> previous version (N1539), but the diff marks are against the final C99
> standard (N1256), which makes it easier to see what's new.

That's a very useful change. Thank you.

--
Ben.

In comp.std.c, article <q09i38->,
wrote:

> There's a new draft (N154 of the proposed C1X standard available on
> the committee's web site. The text of this version is identical to the
> previous version (N1539), but the diff marks are against the final C99
^^^^^

Thanks. Didn't you mean N1547? AFAIK, N1539 is even older, and
different.

--
Vincent Lefèvre <> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

In comp.std.c Vincent Lefevre <vincent-> wrote:
> In comp.std.c, article <q09i38->,
> wrote:
>
> > There's a new draft (N154 of the proposed C1X standard available on
> > the committee's web site. The text of this version is identical to the
> > previous version (N1539), but the diff marks are against the final C99
> ^^^^^
>
> Thanks. Didn't you mean N1547? AFAIK, N1539 is even older, and
> different.

Yes, you're right. Sorry for the confusion.
--
Larry Jones

It COULD'VE happened by accident! -- Calvin