«

"Schneider" wrote in message
news:...

On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:54:01 -0500, Bowser
<> wrote:

>Yes, Bad Travel Photos, an homage to JS, is posted and
>ready for viewing:
>
>http://www.pbase.com/shootin/bad_travel
>
>I must say, this collection is truly in it's badnessosity.
>Truly
>repulsive. Excellent job by all!
>
>For more info on the Shoot-In, see the rulz here:
>
>http://www.pbase.com/shootin/rulzpage


I don't get it.

Just how, again, are these ANY different than all the other
crapshots that
everyone submits to the SI every time? I see absolutely zero
difference
between these and any others that these clowns have
submitted in the past..

Oh well, whatever floats your boat and wastes your life, I
guess...

=============================================

Well, thanks for looking and commenting! Tell you what:
since you, obviously, have skills far beyond any of us, why
don't you submit something and show all how it's REALLY
done? No question we could all learn from you, and your
utter mastery of photography, and we'd all be eternally
grateful for the education you can provide.

BTW, I've been published by National Geographic, have you?

"Paul Furman" <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote in message
news: ...
> Schneider wrote:
>> Bowser wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, I've been published by National Geographic, have you?
>>
>> No. But I've been asked to do shoots for them. I've refused, every time.
>
> Plus, they don't like boring moth shots.

lol touche.

"Schneider" wrote in message
news:...

On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:43:54 -0500, "Bowser" <>
wrote:

>
>BTW, I've been published by National Geographic, have you?
>

No. But I've been asked to do shoots for them. I've refused,
every time.

========================================

So post a link to your stuff. Let's see what you've got.

On 2/2/2011 11:26 PM, Schneider wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:43:54 -0500, "Bowser"<> wrote:
>
>>
>> BTW, I've been published by National Geographic, have you?
>>
>
> No. But I've been asked to do shoots for them. I've refused, every time.
>

Uh! Huh!

--
Peter

On 2/3/2011 2:03 AM, Paul Furman wrote:
> Schneider wrote:
>> Bowser wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, I've been published by National Geographic, have you?
>>
>> No. But I've been asked to do shoots for them. I've refused, every time.
>
> Plus, they don't like boring moth shots.

But what if the moth is rare and never before photographed.

--
Peter

On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:46:43 -0500, Peter N
<> wrote:

>On 2/3/2011 2:03 AM, Paul Furman wrote:
>> Schneider wrote:
>>> Bowser wrote:
>>>
>>>> BTW, I've been published by National Geographic, have you?
>>>
>>> No. But I've been asked to do shoots for them. I've refused, every time.
>>
>> Plus, they don't like boring moth shots.
>
>But what if the moth is rare and never before photographed.

Did National Geographic plan a series of fuzzy, out-of-focus, shots of
rare moths?


--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

On 2/3/2011 11:07 AM, Schneider wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:59:02 -0500, "Bowser"<> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "Schneider" wrote in message
>> news:...
>>
>> On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:43:54 -0500, "Bowser"<>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> BTW, I've been published by National Geographic, have you?
>>>
>>
>> No. But I've been asked to do shoots for them. I've refused,
>> every time.
>>
>> ========================================
>>
>> So post a link to your stuff. Let's see what you've got.
>
> Read the previous comments. I don't cast pearls before swine.
>

If that's your criteria, you should have no trouble posting the links.

--
Peter

On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:26:28 -0600, Schneider <> wrote:
: On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:43:54 -0500, "Bowser" <> wrote:
:
: >
: >BTW, I've been published by National Geographic, have you?
: >
:
: No. But I've been asked to do shoots for them. I've refused, every time.

<Guffaw!!> Supy, you certainly have a droll sense of humor!

Bob

"Schneider" wrote in message
news:...

On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:59:02 -0500, "Bowser" <>
wrote:

>
>
>"Schneider" wrote in message
>news:.. .
>
>On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:43:54 -0500, "Bowser" <>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>BTW, I've been published by National Geographic, have you?
>>
>
>No. But I've been asked to do shoots for them. I've
>refused,
>every time.
>
>========================================
>
>So post a link to your stuff. Let's see what you've got.

Read the previous comments. I don't cast pearls before
swine.

==========================================

Yeah, we're all shocked that you have nothing to show. Which
means you're nothing.

On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 10:07:42 -0600, Schneider <> wrote:
: On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:59:02 -0500, "Bowser" <> wrote:
:
: >
: >
: >"Schneider" wrote in message
: >news:.. .
: >
: >On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:43:54 -0500, "Bowser" <>
: >wrote:
: >
: >>
: >>BTW, I've been published by National Geographic, have you?
: >>
: >
: >No. But I've been asked to do shoots for them. I've refused,
: >every time.
: >
: >========================================
: >
: >So post a link to your stuff. Let's see what you've got.
:
: Read the previous comments. I don't cast pearls before swine.

Those things in that jar are mothballs, not pearls.

Bob