On 2011-01-20, Mark Bluemel <> wrote:
> "Lying" is a rather strong term
But in context, self-referential.
> it's hard to lie about the
> nature/purpose of comp.lang.c when there is no formal definition of it.
You could easily lie about it; all you'd have to do is have an opinion
about the nature or purpose of the group, then say something contrary to
that opinion.
> Empirically I'd suggest the observable nature of the newsgroup is more
> discursive than problem-solving.
I'd mostly think so, but...
I guess I'd say I think it's perfectly appropriate to ask for help in a
discussion group. I don't think a group being a discussion group (which
all Usenet groups are by default unless stated otherwise, giving us our
clear answer) precludes straight requests for help from being appropriate.
However... Many of us are experienced programmers. One of the things
experienced programmers have usually learned is that the words in the
specification are frequently incorrect, because the person asking has
misunderstood the problem they need solved. As a result, if you come here
asking for help, it is reasonably well justified for people to second-guess
your request.
For a specific example, if something looks like homework, most experienced
programmers will conclude that, though the STATED problem was "I want someone
to do this for me", the REAL problem is "I need to learn how to do this so
I can not just get a passing grade but get one honestly".
That said, I didn't think the original looked like homework. It did, however,
look like a fairly arcane spec, and I'm still not sure what the intended
functionality is.
-s
--
Copyright 2010, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach /
usenet-
http://www.seebs.net/log/ <-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) <-- get educated!
I am not speaking for my employer, although they do rent some of my opinions.