"otter" wrote in message
news:4f5bfc83-cfcb-4cdd-a8d7-...
On Jan 10, 3:11 pm, Savageduck
<savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> On 2011-01-10 12:01:31 -0800, Bowser <yeeec...@bleah.ugh>
> said:
>
> > No, not another date or time change, just a question for
> > all the AFP
> > members here. I've been going through my travel photos,
> > and I'm having
> > a hell of a time selecting just three. Honestly, I
> > didn't realize how
> > many bad travel photos I had until I started looking for
> > this mandate.
>
> > Anyone else having trouble paring it down to three? I
> > swear I could
> > increase the number of submissions to 100 per shooter
> > and I'd still
> > want to add a few more. I guess when you've shot a photo
> > of a dog's
> > grave, anything is possible for bad photos. Yes, I
> > really did...
>
> You are aware that the "Bad travel" shots was suggested as
> a snipe at
> John Sisker, who did his damage in alt.photography?
>
> After enduring a year of the Sisker travel galleries let's
> just keep it
> at three. You wouldn't need to pick any of the shots you
> took, just
> pick any three Sisker shots from his years worth of
> submissions.
I'm going to be a LOT careful with my suggestions from now
on.
But, it is actually an intriguing category. I kind of like
Alan
Browne's take. Maybe something that is "bad" in some way,
but
otherwise slightly interesting. Like, say, Barstow:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/billkes...7360/lightbox/
================================================== ====
I was and am aware that it was posed as a joke, but I liked
it! Something we can have some fun with, no question about
it. And that Barstow shot is classic.
Similar Threads
