«

On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 08:00:40 -0800 (PST), RayLopez99 wrote:

> This is more a privacy question but I could not figure out a forum for
> it.

Oh, lessee, let me think, hmmmmmmmmmmm

*ALT.PRIVACY?????*

Nooooo, you don't want to go there and get your rectum reamed for the
umpteenth time. LOL

> Given that one can track IP addresses of people that visit a website,
> and given that IP addresses of all mail, including Usenet posts, is in
> the header,

Show mine.

Can't?

Stick to thumping your meat.

<http://groups.google.com/group/rec.running/browse_frm/thread/dfc30edbbee24d7/d8ec9b08cc94c0c2?tvc=1&q=RayLopez99+nut#d8ec9b08cc 94c0c2>

> is there an automated way of checking all Usenet posts by
> IP address? To see if a particular poster who visited a particular
> website also posted certain messages on Usenet or elsewhere? This
> would be done by the webmaster of the website visited. Is there a
> program to do this? Not manually, which anybody can do, but a
> software program.

Yes.

> I recall years ago some stock forensic accounting firm working with
> the US SEC developed some kind of software--or was it off the shelf?
> that's my question--that allowed you to tell, by comparing IP
> addresses as well as sentence syntax (sentence syntax is difficult, so
> it was probably a custom program) who (by IP address) posted what on
> various penny stock bulletin boards and chat rooms. Then they were
> able to subpoena the internet provider to find out the real world
> identity of the particular person who had that IP address assigned to
> them on a particular day of a certain posting (assuming it was not a
> permanent static address).
>
> RL

Jesus, what a blathering idiot you are.

Here, have some more Astrolube, TallyWhacker. lol

On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:38:21 -0700, Snit wrote:

> Juan stated in post on 1/3/11
> 10:26 AM:
>
>> On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:37:50 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>>
>>> Snit <> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hadron stated in post ifstms$c10$ on 1/3/11 9:32
>>>> AM:
>>>>
>>>>> (Claude V. Lucas) writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> *Some* servers include the IP address of the poster in the header
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your post's header had this line in it
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NNTP-Posting-Host: 94.71.18.120
>>>>>>
>>>>>> which, unless it was spoofed, should be your address...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not all servers implement this feature so some postings are less
>>>>>> traceable.
>>>>>
>>>>> Easily spoofed of course.
>>>>
>>>> Yes... mine has been spoofed on a number of occasions by trolls masquerading
>>>> as me. For a while Carroll and crew were posting under different names with
>>>> my IP address... and then claiming to be my wife and the like. Utterly
>>>> repulsive behavior.
>>>
>>> Sounds like the kind of thing HPT gets up to too.
>>
>> Yea.
>> HPT is always slithering around stalking people.
>
> Look at the list of quotes he has *about* me... scavenged over many years
> and many are out and out forged (from Carroll socks and the like). He does
> that because he *knows* he cannot show me doing as he accuses.
>
> It is reprehensible on his part.
>
> Then again, the fact he and his cohorts target me to such an extent is proof
> they know I am right ... or at least mostly so ... in what I write and that
> I support my views well. There is no other reason for them to obsess about
> me so much.

Who the hell let open the kindergarten door?
--
My Medline articles - http://tinyurl.com/34r38aq

On Jan 3, 8:43*pm, Ari Silverstein <AriSilverst...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 08:00:40 -0800 (PST), RayLopez99 wrote:
> > This is more a privacy question but I could not figure out a forum for
> > it.
>
> Oh, lessee, let me think, hmmmmmmmmmmm
>
> *ALT.PRIVACY?????*
>
> Nooooo, you don't want to go there and get your rectum reamed for the
> umpteenth time. LOL
>
> > Given that one can track IP addresses of people that visit a website,
> > and given that IP addresses of all mail, including Usenet posts, is in
> > the header,
>
> Show mine.
>
> Can't?
>

Reply-To: AriSilverst...@yahoo.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net w9HMm7wkTdd3/M4CtGeavghg4l6mAyEpZVrZ/
4fCpCWZnxai7s
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mgXf7mHmsbGgIPyQCnp0NkiIHHQ=


> Stick to thumping your meat.
>
> <http://groups.google.com/group/rec.running/browse_frm/thread/dfc30edb...>

You behave Ari Silverstein, or I'll stick that Balkan Curse back on
you. (For the rest of you reading this thread, I threatened Ari with
a voodoo curse unless he replied to a certain post, and he dutifully
replied, showing that he was afraid of the curse. LOL Ari believes in
black magic, as do many people).

RL

Ari Silverstein stated in post on 1/3/11
11:46 AM:

> On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:38:21 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> Juan stated in post on 1/3/11
>> 10:26 AM:
>>
>>> On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:37:50 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>>>
>>>> Snit <> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Hadron stated in post ifstms$c10$ on 1/3/11
>>>>> 9:32
>>>>> AM:
>>>>>
>>>>>> (Claude V. Lucas) writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Some* servers include the IP address of the poster in the header
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your post's header had this line in it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NNTP-Posting-Host: 94.71.18.120
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> which, unless it was spoofed, should be your address...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not all servers implement this feature so some postings are less
>>>>>>> traceable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Easily spoofed of course.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes... mine has been spoofed on a number of occasions by trolls
>>>>> masquerading
>>>>> as me. For a while Carroll and crew were posting under different names
>>>>> with
>>>>> my IP address... and then claiming to be my wife and the like. Utterly
>>>>> repulsive behavior.
>>>>
>>>> Sounds like the kind of thing HPT gets up to too.
>>>
>>> Yea.
>>> HPT is always slithering around stalking people.
>>
>> Look at the list of quotes he has *about* me... scavenged over many years
>> and many are out and out forged (from Carroll socks and the like). He does
>> that because he *knows* he cannot show me doing as he accuses.
>>
>> It is reprehensible on his part.
>>
>> Then again, the fact he and his cohorts target me to such an extent is proof
>> they know I am right ... or at least mostly so ... in what I write and that
>> I support my views well. There is no other reason for them to obsess about
>> me so much.
>
> Who the hell let open the kindergarten door?

Welcome to COLA discussions.


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

RayLopez99 stated in post
63715151-678f-4909-a32b-3db3a6e90bae...oglegroups.com on 1/3/11
11:28 AM:

> On Jan 3, 6:24*pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
>> I have, in my logs, the names of some of the folks in COLA/CSMA labeled.
>> For example, Steve Carroll used to claim to never visit my site - so I
>> labeled his IP address. *His name pops up in my logs... and he visits often.
>> I also get visits from others in his area (the IP address can show where
>> someone is from). *He likely goes to neighbors and the library or wherever
>> to view my site.
>>
>
> Just visited your site. So I see now why you're against Linux.

To be clear: I am *not* against Linux. I use it and suggest it to others.
I think it is great... but I also realize it has a *lot* of room for
improvement.

> Indeed, it would give people without any medical problems a heart
> attack, anxiety attack or worse (like epileptic fits trying to install
> it). Makes sense.
>
> RL



--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 11:02:57 -0800 (PST), RayLopez99 wrote:

> On Jan 3, 8:43*pm, Ari Silverstein <AriSilverst...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 08:00:40 -0800 (PST), RayLopez99 wrote:
>>> This is more a privacy question but I could not figure out a forum for
>>> it.
>>
>> Oh, lessee, let me think, hmmmmmmmmmmm
>>
>> *ALT.PRIVACY?????*
>>
>> Nooooo, you don't want to go there and get your rectum reamed for the
>> umpteenth time. LOL
>>
>>> Given that one can track IP addresses of people that visit a website,
>>> and given that IP addresses of all mail, including Usenet posts, is in
>>> the header,
>>
>> Show mine.
>>
>> Can't?
>>
>
> Reply-To: AriSilverst...@yahoo.com
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Trace: individual.net w9HMm7wkTdd3/M4CtGeavghg4l6mAyEpZVrZ/
> 4fCpCWZnxai7s
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:mgXf7mHmsbGgIPyQCnp0NkiIHHQ=

So where's th IP?

You are one of the more insufferably stoPidD imbeciles on Usenet, you
are aware of that?

>> Stick to thumping your meat.
>>
>> <http://groups.google.com/group/rec.running/browse_frm/thread/dfc30edb...>
>
> You behave Ari Silverstein, or I'll stick that Balkan Curse back on
> you. (For the rest of you reading this thread, I threatened Ari with
> a voodoo curse unless he replied to a certain post, and he dutifully
> replied, showing that he was afraid of the curse. LOL Ari believes in
> black magic, as do many people).
>
> RL

On top of being a fukksnort, you're a pathetic troll too.So back to
your dick you go. *LOL*

<http://groups.google.com/group/rec.running/browse_frm/thread/dfc30edbbee24d7/d8ec9b08cc94c0c2?tvc=1&q=RayLopez99+nut#d8ec9b08cc 94c0c2>

--
´If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of
men, I will find something in them which will hang him.¡ ~Cardinal
Richelieu

On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 14:26:42 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:

> On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 11:02:57 -0800 (PST), RayLopez99 wrote:
>
>> On Jan 3, 8:43*pm, Ari Silverstein <AriSilverst...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 08:00:40 -0800 (PST), RayLopez99 wrote:
>>>> This is more a privacy question but I could not figure out a forum for
>>>> it.
>>>
>>> Oh, lessee, let me think, hmmmmmmmmmmm
>>>
>>> *ALT.PRIVACY?????*
>>>
>>> Nooooo, you don't want to go there and get your rectum reamed for the
>>> umpteenth time. LOL
>>>
>>>> Given that one can track IP addresses of people that visit a website,
>>>> and given that IP addresses of all mail, including Usenet posts, is in
>>>> the header,
>>>
>>> Show mine.
>>>
>>> Can't?
>>>
>>
>> Reply-To: AriSilverst...@yahoo.com
>> Mime-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> X-Trace: individual.net w9HMm7wkTdd3/M4CtGeavghg4l6mAyEpZVrZ/
>> 4fCpCWZnxai7s
>> Cancel-Lock: sha1:mgXf7mHmsbGgIPyQCnp0NkiIHHQ=
>
> So where's the IP?
>
> You are one of the more insufferably stoPidD imbeciles on Usenet, you
> are aware of that?

Well, Meat Thumper, where is my IP address?

Stick to thumping your meat.

<http://groups.google.com/group/rec.running/browse_frm/thread/dfc30edbbee24d7/d8ec9b08cc94c0c2?tvc=1&q=RayLopez99+nut#d8ec9b08cc 94c0c2>
--
´If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of
men, I will find something in them which will hang him.¡ ~Cardinal
Richelieu

On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:21:43 -0700, Snit wrote:

> Ari Silverstein stated in post on 1/3/11
> 11:46 AM:
>
>> On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:38:21 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>
>>> Juan stated in post on 1/3/11
>>> 10:26 AM:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:37:50 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit <> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hadron stated in post ifstms$c10$ on 1/3/11
>>>>>> 9:32
>>>>>> AM:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (Claude V. Lucas) writes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Some* servers include the IP address of the poster in the header
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your post's header had this line in it
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> NNTP-Posting-Host: 94.71.18.120
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> which, unless it was spoofed, should be your address...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not all servers implement this feature so some postings are less
>>>>>>>> traceable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Easily spoofed of course.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes... mine has been spoofed on a number of occasions by trolls
>>>>>> masquerading
>>>>>> as me. For a while Carroll and crew were posting under different names
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> my IP address... and then claiming to be my wife and the like. Utterly
>>>>>> repulsive behavior.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds like the kind of thing HPT gets up to too.
>>>>
>>>> Yea.
>>>> HPT is always slithering around stalking people.
>>>
>>> Look at the list of quotes he has *about* me... scavenged over many years
>>> and many are out and out forged (from Carroll socks and the like). He does
>>> that because he *knows* he cannot show me doing as he accuses.
>>>
>>> It is reprehensible on his part.
>>>
>>> Then again, the fact he and his cohorts target me to such an extent is proof
>>> they know I am right ... or at least mostly so ... in what I write and that
>>> I support my views well. There is no other reason for them to obsess about
>>> me so much.
>>
>> Who the hell let open the kindergarten door?
>
> Welcome to COLA discussions.

Is Meat Thumper RayLopez99 one of yours over there on COLA? If so,
would you mind packing him back into his Jack-In-The-Box, fer
chrissakes? lol
--
<http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_WhnvofcHy48/SDxAZbSaqnI/AAAAAAAAADo/Qh2FYauXJMo/s400/RIMG0019-2.JPG>

RayLopez99 wrote:
> This is more a privacy question but I could not figure out a forum for
> it.

Some privacy newsgroups have the word "privacy" in their names.

I don't know the program you are talking about, but if you find it I
would be interested in the "posting style" aspect of identification. It
is my belief that *that* method is more powerful than just an IP address
or even a range of IP addresses. With all of the different ways users
can access the internet and usenet, IP numbers change too often to be of
any use outside of the authority's ability to match the IP and the time
to the client account and contactable person's name and street address.

Usenet posts can be completely untraceable if the right system is used,
but posting style can be a dead giveaway good enough for non-authorities.

RayLopez99 wrote:
> On Jan 3, 6:32 pm, Hadron<hadronqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> NNTP-Posting-Host: 94.71.18.120
>>
>>> which, unless it was spoofed, should be your address...
>>
>>> Not all servers implement this feature so some postings are less traceable.
>>
>> Easily spoofed of course.
>
> Yes apparently easily spoofed--and Peter Kohlmann for one thinks I'm
> not posting from Greece. But tell me, how is it easily spoofed?
> Using what program or platform? Unix? Microsoft? I've always heard
> that it's easy to spoof but never looked into the mechanics of it.

It is text based, see the NNTP RFC's.