"Aardvark" <> wrote in message
news:WfQSo.1140$2...
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:08:09 -0500, SeaNymph wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" <> wrote in message
>> news:ifgbqd$bai$...
>>> Eagle wrote:
>>>> Jenn laid this down on his screen :
>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:03:28 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:47:22 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've always enjoyed the quotes of Ann Coulter!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I find that statement almost believable, coming from you.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>> As *you* might say ....... Huh? (Or WTF???)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've told you before - I *always* tell the truth! 
>>>
>>>>>> And show your lunacy by expressing appreciation of that ****ing
>>>>>> Coulter. There are some things best kept to oneself.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Another example of someone on the left who believes his opinion is SO
>>>>> right that he judges those who don't think as he does as expressing
>>>>> lunacy.
>>>
>>>> Can you imagine this dork holding a seat in British government? The
>>>> Brits have it bad enough with all those hate-filled muslimers running
>>>> around saying they will overthrow the British Government and make
>>>> everyone aim at Mecca and say a mess of hail mary's. :-@
>>>
>>> I don't understand why enjoying quotes from Ann Coulter is equivalent
>>> to lunacy?
>>
>> I'm pretty sure it's called an opinion.
>
> That's what I call it too.
Now here's yet another conundrum. If someone says something to the effect
that liberals, socialists and progressives should be disarmed, or that same
group of individuals lie, cheat and steal, or perhaps they smear others
needlessly, or whatever you choose to put there, isn't that the same thing?
So, what I'm seeing is that there are some who believe its okay to demean
others, as long as those others are different from you ideologically. Yet,
if those being demeaned express an opinion, there's something wrong with
that.
Weird.
>
>
>
> --
>