Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Digital Photography > Re: Lens hoods?

Reply
Thread Tools

Re: Lens hoods?

 
 
Wolfgang Weisselberg
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-26-2010
Paul Furman <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote:

> may have shiny bits inside. It would be nice to devise a compact set of
> lens shades with that using velcro so they could be unrolled and fit
> neatly in a side pocket, flattened.


Which wouldn't protect the lens against bangs in daily use,
which is the other important reason for lens hoods. But
then, it's probably the price to pay for flattening them.

-Wolfgang
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Pete Stavrakoglou
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-27-2010
If the lens hood is in place and an object like a stone or pebble "kicks
up", it's less likely that it would hit the front element than if the lens
hood is not on.

"Whisky-dave" <> wrote in message
news:8c2e190c-c590-4c67-8695-...
On 26 Oct, 14:42, Wolfgang Weisselberg <ozcvgt...@sneakemail.com>
wrote:
> Paul Furman <pa...@-edgehill.net> wrote:
> > may have shiny bits inside. It would be nice to devise a compact set of
> > lens shades with that using velcro so they could be unrolled and fit
> > neatly in a side pocket, flattened.

>
> Which wouldn't protect the lens against bangs in daily use,
> which is the other important reason for lens hoods. But
> then, it's probably the price to pay for flattening them.
>
> -Wolfgang


I don;t really understand how a lens hood protects the lens.
I've always found it make it worse because the 'lens' is actually
longer
with a lens hood attached and therefore more likily that I or
something else will
knock into it.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Wolfgang Weisselberg
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-28-2010
Whisky-dave <> wrote:
> On 26 Oct, 14:42, Wolfgang Weisselberg <ozcvgt...@sneakemail.com>


>> Which wouldn't protect the lens against bangs in daily use,
>> which is the other important reason for lens hoods. Â*But
>> then, it's probably the price to pay for flattening them.


> I don;t really understand how a lens hood protects the lens.
> I've always found it make it worse because the 'lens' is actually
> longer
> with a lens hood attached and therefore more likily that I or
> something else will
> knock into it.


Take a 70-200mm lens with a chopped tulip style lenshood. I.e. a
rather long one.

Unless there's something rather long and thin, it'll be stuck
in the lens hood before reaching the front element. Same for
fingers --- you have to actively reach inside, there's little
chance you'll touch the front element by accident.

-Wolfgang
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DIGITAL LENS VS REGULAR LENS silvio Digital Photography 1 06-16-2004 04:25 AM
Canon 10D lens Nikon Lens SteveJ Digital Photography 29 06-14-2004 12:52 AM
Anyone use the Kodak DX6340 Lens Adapter and Telephoto Lens? Amyotte Digital Photography 3 02-11-2004 10:25 PM
Good everyday lens for Digital Rebel -- kit lens, 17-40mm f/4L, or...? Mike Kozlowski Digital Photography 5 12-30-2003 08:04 AM
Tamron lens *is* crap --> interesting lens comparison! Beowulf Digital Photography 12 08-24-2003 05:21 PM



Advertisments