«

On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:34:19 +0000, chuckcar wrote:

> Meat Plow <> wrote in
> news:
>
>> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:15:20 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>
>>> Meat Plow <> wrote in
>>> news:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:04:06 +0000, Meat Plow wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:47:05 -0400, NoSpamm wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for all the replies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks like AutoPlay was already disabled. Meaning that 'Turn off
>>>>>> Autoplay' was set to 'Enabled'. I found this under Computer
>>>>>> Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> Windows Components ->
>>>>>> AutoPlay Policies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So which log(s) would should I search through and what should I be
>>>>>> looking for?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> That be in the Control Panel - Administrative Tools - Event Viewer -
>>>>> Applications. That is if I recall correctly. In Win 7 it's
>>>>> /Adminstrative Tools - Event Viewer - Windows Logs - Applications.
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't have a Vista to boot into to check.
>>>>
>>>> BTW you are looking for an application hang.
>>>>
>>> So something running then. Funny you mention that...
>>
>> If you are trying to 'put words in my mouth' it ain't gunna happen.
>>
> I don't have to. application means *exactly* that.

WHAT a REVELATION! Chucktard says applications are running.

<boggle>



--
Live Fast, Die Young and Leave a Pretty Corpse

Meat Plow <> wrote in
news:

> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:34:19 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't have a Vista to boot into to check.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW you are looking for an application hang.
>>>>>
>>>> So something running then. Funny you mention that...
>>>
>>> If you are trying to 'put words in my mouth' it ain't gunna happen.
>>>
>> I don't have to. application means *exactly* that.
>
> WHAT a REVELATION! Chucktard says applications are running.
>
Yes. Several. In startup. Finally you see the light. Well, as much as
you can that is.


--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )

On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:30:18 +0000, chuckcar wrote:

> Meat Plow <> wrote in
> news:
>
>> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:34:19 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>>> Don't have a Vista to boot into to check.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW you are looking for an application hang.
>>>>>>
>>>>> So something running then. Funny you mention that...
>>>>
>>>> If you are trying to 'put words in my mouth' it ain't gunna happen.
>>>>
>>> I don't have to. application means *exactly* that.
>>
>> WHAT a REVELATION! Chucktard says applications are running.
>>
> Yes. Several. In startup. Finally you see the light. Well, as much as
> you can that is.

Look chucktard, you know less about any Windows OS than just about anyone
posting here. If you are going to match wits with me you first; A. Need
wit. B. Need to know more about Windows OS than I do. C. Need to think
about what you are going to post 'before' you hit SEND.

Your ASSumption the OP has several programs in whatever the **** you mean
by "startup" is incomplete and absurd.



--
Live Fast, Die Young and Leave a Pretty Corpse

Meat Plow <> wrote in
news:

> On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:30:18 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>
>> Meat Plow <> wrote in
>> news:
>>
>>> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:34:19 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>> Don't have a Vista to boot into to check.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW you are looking for an application hang.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> So something running then. Funny you mention that...
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are trying to 'put words in my mouth' it ain't gunna
>>>>> happen.
>>>>>
>>>> I don't have to. application means *exactly* that.
>>>
>>> WHAT a REVELATION! Chucktard says applications are running.
>>>
>> Yes. Several. In startup. Finally you see the light. Well, as much as
>> you can that is.
>
> Look chucktard, you know less about any Windows OS than just about
> anyone posting here. If you are going to match wits with me you first;
> A. Need wit. B. Need to know more about Windows OS than I do. C. Need
> to think about what you are going to post 'before' you hit SEND.
>
LOL. You massive ego

> Your ASSumption the OP has several programs in whatever the **** you
> mean by "startup" is incomplete and absurd.
>
Of course it isn't. I defy you do get any name brand consumer PC that's
just been restored with at least 15 running entires in startup.



--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )

On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 02:02:05 +0000, chuckcar wrote:

> Meat Plow <> wrote in
> news:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:30:18 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>
>>> Meat Plow <> wrote in
>>> news:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:34:19 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Don't have a Vista to boot into to check.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW you are looking for an application hang.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So something running then. Funny you mention that...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are trying to 'put words in my mouth' it ain't gunna happen.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I don't have to. application means *exactly* that.
>>>>
>>>> WHAT a REVELATION! Chucktard says applications are running.
>>>>
>>> Yes. Several. In startup. Finally you see the light. Well, as much as
>>> you can that is.
>>
>> Look chucktard, you know less about any Windows OS than just about
>> anyone posting here. If you are going to match wits with me you first;
>> A. Need wit. B. Need to know more about Windows OS than I do. C. Need to
>> think about what you are going to post 'before' you hit SEND.
>>
> LOL. You massive ego
>
>> Your ASSumption the OP has several programs in whatever the **** you
>> mean by "startup" is incomplete and absurd.
>>
> Of course it isn't. I defy you do get any name brand consumer PC that's
> just been restored with at least 15 running entires in startup.

Dell PW690, 3.2GHz Xeon dual-core, 4GB D-Ram

26 (count 'em) programs running in what you like to call "startup",
chucktard. Did one 'system restore', one time, quite a while ago &
haven't needed it since.

anyone <> wrote in
news:4cb34554$0$2128$c3e8da3$ b.com:

> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 02:02:05 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>
>> Meat Plow <> wrote in
>> news:
>>
>>>
>>> Your ASSumption the OP has several programs in whatever the **** you
>>> mean by "startup" is incomplete and absurd.
>>>
>> Of course it isn't. I defy you do get any name brand consumer PC
>> that's just been restored with at least 15 running entires in
>> startup.
>
> Dell PW690, 3.2GHz Xeon dual-core, 4GB D-Ram
>
> 26 (count 'em) programs running in what you like to call "startup",
> chucktard. Did one 'system restore', one time, quite a while ago &
> haven't needed it since.
>
Yeah, And on a good day you may even beat a 1Ghz computer. I said at
*least* 15. Thanks for the backup.


--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )

On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:11:48 -0700, anyone wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 02:02:05 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>
>> Meat Plow <> wrote in
>> news:
>>
>>> On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:30:18 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>>
>>>> Meat Plow <> wrote in
>>>> news:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:34:19 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Don't have a Vista to boot into to check.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW you are looking for an application hang.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So something running then. Funny you mention that...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you are trying to 'put words in my mouth' it ain't gunna
>>>>>>> happen.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't have to. application means *exactly* that.
>>>>>
>>>>> WHAT a REVELATION! Chucktard says applications are running.
>>>>>
>>>> Yes. Several. In startup. Finally you see the light. Well, as much as
>>>> you can that is.
>>>
>>> Look chucktard, you know less about any Windows OS than just about
>>> anyone posting here. If you are going to match wits with me you first;
>>> A. Need wit. B. Need to know more about Windows OS than I do. C. Need
>>> to think about what you are going to post 'before' you hit SEND.
>>>
>> LOL. You massive ego
>>
>>> Your ASSumption the OP has several programs in whatever the **** you
>>> mean by "startup" is incomplete and absurd.
>>>
>> Of course it isn't. I defy you do get any name brand consumer PC that's
>> just been restored with at least 15 running entires in startup.
>
> Dell PW690, 3.2GHz Xeon dual-core, 4GB D-Ram
>
> 26 (count 'em) programs running in what you like to call "startup",
> chucktard. Did one 'system restore', one time, quite a while ago &
> haven't needed it since.

I like to refer to things that start during boot as tasks running in
background or processes. Without user interaction. Not programs or
entries in "startup" whatever the chucktard means by that. I think the
chucktard is trying to incorrectly infer that I'm saying nothing runs
when you start an operating system. In reality I'm trying to get to the
bottom of this mystical, magical "things in startup" he refers to.



--
Live Fast, Die Young and Leave a Pretty Corpse

Meat Plow <> wrote in
news:

> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:11:48 -0700, anyone wrote:

>>>> Your ASSumption the OP has several programs in whatever the ****
>>>> you mean by "startup" is incomplete and absurd.
>>>>
The mere fact that you phrase it that way shows only that you know
absolutely about the relevant topic or point.

>>> Of course it isn't. I defy you do get any name brand consumer PC
>>> that's just been restored with at least 15 running entires in
>>> startup.
>>
>> Dell PW690, 3.2GHz Xeon dual-core, 4GB D-Ram
>>
>> 26 (count 'em) programs running in what you like to call "startup",
>> chucktard. Did one 'system restore', one time, quite a while ago &
>> haven't needed it since.
>
> I like to refer to things that start during boot as tasks running in
> background or processes. Without user interaction. Not programs or
> entries in "startup" whatever the chucktard means by that. I think the
> chucktard is trying to incorrectly infer that I'm saying nothing runs
> when you start an operating system. In reality I'm trying to get to
> the bottom of this mystical, magical "things in startup" he refers to.
>
>
Well, then try *reading* something about it. There's loads of
information on the web both about these wastes of processor power and
disabling them.


--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )

Meat Plow wrote on 11-Oct-10 11:01 ...
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:11:48 -0700, anyone wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 02:02:05 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>
>>> Meat Plow<> wrote in
>>> news:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:30:18 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Meat Plow<> wrote in
>>>>> news:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:34:19 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Don't have a Vista to boot into to check.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> BTW you are looking for an application hang.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So something running then. Funny you mention that...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you are trying to 'put words in my mouth' it ain't gunna
>>>>>>>> happen.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't have to. application means *exactly* that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WHAT a REVELATION! Chucktard says applications are running.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. Several. In startup. Finally you see the light. Well, as much as
>>>>> you can that is.
>>>>
>>>> Look chucktard, you know less about any Windows OS than just about
>>>> anyone posting here. If you are going to match wits with me you first;
>>>> A. Need wit. B. Need to know more about Windows OS than I do. C. Need
>>>> to think about what you are going to post 'before' you hit SEND.
>>>>
>>> LOL. You massive ego
>>>
>>>> Your ASSumption the OP has several programs in whatever the **** you
>>>> mean by "startup" is incomplete and absurd.
>>>>
>>> Of course it isn't. I defy you do get any name brand consumer PC that's
>>> just been restored with at least 15 running entires in startup.
>>
>> Dell PW690, 3.2GHz Xeon dual-core, 4GB D-Ram
>>
>> 26 (count 'em) programs running in what you like to call "startup",
>> chucktard. Did one 'system restore', one time, quite a while ago&
>> haven't needed it since.
>
> I like to refer to things that start during boot as tasks running in
> background or processes. Without user interaction. Not programs or
> entries in "startup" whatever the chucktard means by that. I think the
> chucktard is trying to incorrectly infer that I'm saying nothing runs
> when you start an operating system. In reality I'm trying to get to the
> bottom of this mystical, magical "things in startup" he refers to.

Good luck... I haven't yet seen him adequately explain any of his claims.

chuckcar wrote on 11-Oct-10 11:36 ...
> Meat Plow<> wrote in
> news:
>
>> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:11:48 -0700, anyone wrote:
>
>>>>> Your ASSumption the OP has several programs in whatever the ****
>>>>> you mean by "startup" is incomplete and absurd.
>>>>>
> The mere fact that you phrase it that way shows only that you know
> absolutely about the relevant topic or point.
>
>>>> Of course it isn't. I defy you do get any name brand consumer PC
>>>> that's just been restored with at least 15 running entires in
>>>> startup.
>>>
>>> Dell PW690, 3.2GHz Xeon dual-core, 4GB D-Ram
>>>
>>> 26 (count 'em) programs running in what you like to call "startup",
>>> chucktard. Did one 'system restore', one time, quite a while ago&
>>> haven't needed it since.
>>
>> I like to refer to things that start during boot as tasks running in
>> background or processes. Without user interaction. Not programs or
>> entries in "startup" whatever the chucktard means by that. I think the
>> chucktard is trying to incorrectly infer that I'm saying nothing runs
>> when you start an operating system. In reality I'm trying to get to
>> the bottom of this mystical, magical "things in startup" he refers to.
>>
>>
> Well, then try *reading* something about it. There's loads of
> information on the web both about these wastes of processor power and
> disabling them.

whutta surprise...