Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Computer Support > Are you ready for the next leap into computer communications?

Reply
Thread Tools

Are you ready for the next leap into computer communications?

 
 
chuckcar
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-27-2010
§ñühw¤£f <> wrote in
news:i7iele$c04$:

WTF are you crosposing to alt.2600 for now?

--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Ruth
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-27-2010
On 26 Sep., 22:52, §ñühw¤£f <snuhwolf5...@Use-Author-Supplied-
Address.invalid> wrote:
> chuckcar <ch...@nil.car> pinched out a steaming pile
> of<Xns9DFFDCF33A656ch...@127.0.0.1>:
>
> >§ñühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> >news:i7iele$c04$:

>
> >WTF are you crosposing to alt.2600 for now?

>
> Because I can? Lets get the Slackers going


You can not.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
§ñühw¤£f
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-27-2010
Robert James wrote:
> On this day, 26 Sep 2010. §ñühw¤£f, another Scientologist from alt.2600,
> working with LRH's tech failed to clear any of their engrams or body
> thetans. Therefore §ñühw¤£f is a PTS and will go to the Comm Ev due to
> out-ethics. §ñühw¤£f's overts must be declared to get back on source.
>
>> Robert James <> pinched out a steaming pile
>> of<Xns9DFF7FBA9CD25robertjames2600kook@81.169.183. 62>:
>>
>>> On this day, 26 Sep 2010. §ñühw¤£f, another Scientologist from

>> alt.2600,
>>> working with LRH's tech failed to clear any of their engrams or body
>>> thetans. Therefore §ñühw¤£f is a PTS and will go to the Comm Ev due to
>>> out-ethics. §ñühw¤£f's overts must be declared to get back on source.
>>>
>>>> Robert James wrote:
>>>>> On this day, 25 Sep 2010. §nühw¤£f, another Scientologist from
>>> alt.2600,
>>>>> working with LRH's tech failed to clear any of their engrams or

>> body
>>>>> thetans. Therefore §nühw¤£f is a PTS and will go to the Comm Ev due
>>> to
>>>>> out-ethics. §nühw¤£f's overts must be declared to get back on

>> source.
>>>>>> In message <Xns9DFE69B111EB8robertjames2600kook@188.40.43.230 >,
>>> Robert
>>>>>> James pondered the following:
>>>>>>> On this day, 25 Sep 2010. §ñühw¤£f, another Scientologist from
>>>>>>> alt.2600,
>>>>>>> working with LRH's tech failed to clear any of their engrams or
>>> body
>>>>>>> thetans. Therefore §ñühw¤£f is a PTS and will go to the Comm Ev

>> due
>>>>>>> to out-ethics. §ñühw¤£f's overts must be declared to get back on
>>>>>>> source.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Robert James wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 24, 10:03 am, §ñühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Xpoasted for smarder peeps to see.
>>>>>>>>> Missed ya, Wolf!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You'll need to adjust your sights to allow for the cross wind...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm a one froup man.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well thats better than being a "backdoor man" IYKWIMAITYD...
>>>>> O`ho hum, Mr. Wolf Toy.
>>>>>
>>>> Who's poasting as "Hatter"? Dosn't seem to fit the orthographics of
>>> the
>>>> old Matty.
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm...
>>> Beats me this time, at least the ~~sock~~~ that posted the thread "MY
>>> LIFE IS TEH BETTER THAN YOURS" got a bit of lulz and was 99.5% his
>>> style.
>>>

>> Hmmmm...there were three threads poasted to AUK by "Hatter". But they
>> were absent any sigfile. So I'd assume its not a gen-yoo-wine Matty
>> poast.

>
> Well he did lose all his equpitment, byt that was AFTER he uninstalled
> his newsreader anyway.
>

I bet he's hard at work on soem fantastic new websites for his many clients.

<nods>

--
www.skepticalscience.com|www.youtube.com/officialpeta
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\


 
Reply With Quote
 
§ñühw¤£f
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-27-2010
Robert James wrote:
> On this day, 26 Sep 2010. §ñühw¤£f, another Scientologist from alt.2600,
> working with LRH's tech failed to clear any of their engrams or body
> thetans. Therefore §ñühw¤£f is a PTS and will go to the Comm Ev due to
> out-ethics. §ñühw¤£f's overts must be declared to get back on source.
>
>> Robert James <> pinched out a steaming pile
>> of<Xns9DFFA25A7B8E8robertjames2600kook@188.40.43.2 30>:
>>
>>> On this day, 26 Sep 2010. §nühw¤£f, another Scientologist from

>> alt.2600,
>>> working with LRH's tech failed to clear any of their engrams or body
>>> thetans. Therefore §nühw¤£f is a PTS and will go to the Comm Ev due to
>>> out-ethics. §nühw¤£f's overts must be declared to get back on source.
>>>
>>>> In message <Xns9DFF7EA97EB5Arobertjames2600kook@81.169.183.62 >,

>> Robert
>>>> James pondered the following:
>>>>> On this day, 26 Sep 2010. §ñühw¤£f, another Scientologist from
>>>>> alt.2600,
>>>>> working with LRH's tech failed to clear any of their engrams or

>> body
>>>>> thetans. Therefore §ñühw¤£f is a PTS and will go to the Comm Ev due
>>>>> to out-ethics. §ñühw¤£f's overts must be declared to get back on
>>>>> source.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Robert James wrote:
>>>>>>> On this day, 25 Sep 2010. §nühw¤£f, another Scientologist from
>>>>> alt.2600,
>>>>>>> working with LRH's tech failed to clear any of their engrams or
>>>>>>> body thetans. Therefore §nühw¤£f is a PTS and will go to the

>> Comm
>>>>>>> Ev due
>>>>> to
>>>>>>> out-ethics. §nühw¤£f's overts must be declared to get back on
>>>>> source.
>>>>>>>> In message <i7l1to$q83$>,

>> OldGringo38
>>>>>>>> pondered the following:
>>>>>>>>> On 9/25/2010 9:32 AM Just to please that super-ego, §ñühw¤£f
>>>>>>>>> wrote the following tidbit of information:
>>>>>>>>>> Robert James wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 24, 10:03 am, §ñühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Xpoasted for smarder peeps to see.
>>>>>>>>>>> Missed ya, Wolf!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You'll need to adjust your sights to allow for the cross
>>>>>>>>>> wind...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Another one?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wtf does that even mean?
>>>>>>>> <rolls eyes>
>>>>>>> It means newman time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... Sorry, I`m a little high.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> A Seinfeld reference? Well I guess you are
>>>>> A South Park regerence, refered by Towlie, refering to Newman,
>>>>> refered to in Seinfeld
>>>>>
>>>> Ah, I only started watching SouthPArk this year with any regularity.
>>> Huh, watched it since it first came out.
>>>
>>>> Its writers tendency towards libertarianism turned me off initially.
>>> But what about Little Cartman Hitler?
>>>

>> Not saying its not *funny*. Its just that the moralizing tends to
>> fall on the right side of the political spectrum. Mocking hippies is a
>> sure clue.

>
> That's my point exactly, Little Cartman Hitler and the dirty pot smoking
> Jewish hippies...
>
>
>

Apparently I need to watch that show moer oftin. Ive only seen like 12
episodes.

--
www.skepticalscience.com|www.youtube.com/officialpeta
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\


 
Reply With Quote
 
§ñühw¤£f
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-27-2010
Robert James wrote:
> On this day, 27 Sep 2010. Ruth, another Scientologist from alt.2600,
> working with LRH's tech failed to clear any of their engrams or body
> thetans. Therefore Ruth is a PTS and will go to the Comm Ev due to out-
> ethics. Ruth's overts must be declared to get back on source.
>
>> On 26 Sep., 22:52, §ñühw¤£f <snuhwolf5...@Use-Author-Supplied-
>> Address.invalid> wrote:
>>> chuckcar <ch...@nil.car> pinched out a steaming pile
>>> of<Xns9DFFDCF33A656ch...@127.0.0.1>:
>>>
>>>> §ñühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>> news:i7iele$c04$:
>>>> WTF are you crosposing to alt.2600 for now?
>>> Because I can? Lets get the Slackers going

>> You can not.
>>

>
> Can be done, it's an established fact.
>

I like a challenge, so long as its not like hard & stuff.

--
www.skepticalscience.com|www.youtube.com/officialpeta
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\


 
Reply With Quote
 
Tater Gumfries
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-27-2010
On Sep 27, 8:55*am, §ñühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Robert James wrote:
> > On this day, 27 Sep 2010. Ruth, another Scientologist from alt.2600,
> > working with LRH's tech failed to clear any of their engrams or body
> > thetans. Therefore Ruth is a PTS and will go to the Comm Ev due to out-
> > ethics. Ruth's overts must be declared to get back on source.

>
> >> On 26 Sep., 22:52, §ñühw¤£f <snuhwolf5...@Use-Author-Supplied-
> >> Address.invalid> wrote:
> >>> chuckcar <ch...@nil.car> pinched out a steaming pile
> >>> of<Xns9DFFDCF33A656ch...@127.0.0.1>:

>
> >>>> §ñühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> >>>>news:i7iele$c04$:
> >>>> WTF are you crosposing to alt.2600 for now?
> >>> Because I can? Lets get the Slackers going
> >> You can not.

>
> > Can be done, it's an established fact.

>
> I like a challenge, so long as its not like hard & stuff.


Bastard.

Tater
 
Reply With Quote
 
§ñühw¤£f
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-27-2010
Tater Gumfries wrote:
> On Sep 27, 8:55 am, §ñühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Robert James wrote:
>>> On this day, 27 Sep 2010. Ruth, another Scientologist from alt.2600,
>>> working with LRH's tech failed to clear any of their engrams or body
>>> thetans. Therefore Ruth is a PTS and will go to the Comm Ev due to out-
>>> ethics. Ruth's overts must be declared to get back on source.
>>>> On 26 Sep., 22:52, §ñühw¤£f <snuhwolf5...@Use-Author-Supplied-
>>>> Address.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> chuckcar <ch...@nil.car> pinched out a steaming pile
>>>>> of<Xns9DFFDCF33A656ch...@127.0.0.1>:
>>>>>> §ñühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>>>> news:i7iele$c04$:
>>>>>> WTF are you crosposing to alt.2600 for now?
>>>>> Because I can? Lets get the Slackers going
>>>> You can not.
>>> Can be done, it's an established fact.

>> I like a challenge, so long as its not like hard & stuff.

>
> Bastard.
>
> Tater


I beat you to it, huh?

--
www.skepticalscience.com|www.youtube.com/officialpeta
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\


 
Reply With Quote
 
Robert James
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-27-2010
On Sep 27, 10:28*am, §ñühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Tater Gumfries wrote:
> > On Sep 27, 8:55 am, §ñühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Robert James wrote:
> >>> On this day, 27 Sep 2010. Ruth, another Scientologist from alt.2600,
> >>> working with LRH's tech failed to clear any of their engrams or body
> >>> thetans. Therefore Ruth is a PTS and will go to the Comm Ev due to out-
> >>> ethics. Ruth's overts must be declared to get back on source.
> >>>> On 26 Sep., 22:52, §ñühw¤£f <snuhwolf5...@Use-Author-Supplied-
> >>>> Address.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>> chuckcar <ch...@nil.car> pinched out a steaming pile
> >>>>> of<Xns9DFFDCF33A656ch...@127.0.0.1>:
> >>>>>> §ñühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> >>>>>>news:i7iele$c04$:
> >>>>>> WTF are you crosposing to alt.2600 for now?
> >>>>> Because I can? Lets get the Slackers going
> >>>> You can not.
> >>> Can be done, it's an established fact.
> >> I like a challenge, so long as its not like hard & stuff.

>
> > Bastard.

>
> > Tater

>
> I beat you to it, huh?


I don't remember at all. Wait a minute. Let me get high, then I'll
know where it is.

--
At work I'll use this Gigalo Groupies thingy.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Look Before Leap into Windows 7 Ablang Windows 64bit 6 11-09-2009 06:30 PM
Ready to buy your next digital camera online? Sigmon Fraud Digital Photography 4 07-08-2009 02:51 AM
AP340 LEAP and non-leap users nicklebon@netscape.net Cisco 1 04-02-2005 09:10 PM
CurrentElement->next = CurrentElement->next->next (UNDEFINED?) Deniz Bahar C Programming 2 03-09-2005 12:45 AM
one infinite leap and you thought the bible code was somthing!! zetasum Java 0 02-01-2005 05:02 PM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57