On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 22:55:37 +0530, pawihte wrote:
> Old Codger wrote:
>> On 28/08/2010 17:45, pawihte wrote:
>>> Old Gringo38 wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 21:55:30 +0530, pawihte wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Old Gringo38 wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:29:58 +0530, pawihte wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm preparing a new hard disk for someone who will be using
>>>>>>> Win
>>>>>>> XP for some time but may want to install 7 later. As I've never
>>>>>>> used Win 7 either, I'm not sure how large I should make the
>>>>>>> OS
>>>>>>> partition.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For simplicity, let's assume that the owner can be expected
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> follow my usage patterns: I always have My Documents on a non-OS
>>>>>>> partition, disable hibernation and System Restore, and delete
>>>>>>> Windows SP backup files. My pagefile is currently 3GB. For years,
>>>>>>> I found 10GB quite enough for XP and all the programs I normally
>>>>>>> install, but more recently increased that to 20GB, mostly because
>>>>>>> I occasionally place several GBs temporarily on the desktop.
>>>>>>> Even
>>>>>>> then I seldom use more than 10GB of the C: drive.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, taking those things into consideration, what do you suggest
>>>>>>> as the system drive size that's not likely to require resizing
>>>>>>> for Win 7, but without going overboard and thus unnecessarily
>>>>>>> reducing the space available for data in other partitions? Thanks
>>>>>>> in advance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The size of the drive may have an important factor in determining
>>>>>> this. 1/2& 1/2 would sound good to me. Lots of ifs here.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's why I took the time to explain my usage habits which I
>>>>> expect the owner to emulate. I prefer to keep the OS partition
>>>>> as
>>>>> small as possible without being cramped for installation of
>>>>> additional programs in the foreseeable future. This is because
>>>>> many unskilled users often mess up their system so badly that
>>>>> a
>>>>> complete reinstallation is the most practicable solution.
>>>>>
>>>>> I make a backup of the system drive, complete with drivers, apps,
>>>>> registration and personal preferences. Backup file size is reduced
>>>>> to a minimum if no user data was saved on the system drive. It also
>>>>> saves the hassle of sorting out all the clutter
>>>>> that has to backed up on another drive in case the OS drive has
>>>>> to be formatted. This way, the entire system drive can be restored
>>>>> in a few minutes.
>>>>
>>>> If knowing what what you want to do and why, the case should be
>>>> closed
>>>> before it was opened. JHC
>>>
>>> I really don't understand what you're trying to say here. I've
>>> explained at length how I usually use my OS partition, but not being
>>> familiar with Windows 7, I asked for advice on choosing a
>>> suitable partition size. Your replies make no sense.
>>
>> This is usenet, what else do you expect?
>
> You have a point there.
I think the advice I gave you to let Win 7 manage itself was probably the
best you're going to get. Here's an image of my drive configuration.
http://bayimg.com/jAoNkAAcj
Disc0 is Vista. Disc1 linux Disc2 Win 7.
I don't see a reason to partition NTFS any other way besides what the
operating system defaults to.
--
Live Fast, Die Young and Leave a Pretty Corpse