«

On Aug 2, 5:06*am, "Peter" <peter...@nospamoptonline.net> wrote:
> "Paul Furman" <pa...@-edgehill.net> wrote in message
>
> news: ...
>
>
>
> > 1.2x green shown. It looks awful.
>
> >> and -30% blue is just about right.
>
> > .83x blue show, as I suggested, if anything.
>
> > I combined those two for your recipe...
>
> Paul, I don't understand why you take it seriously.
>
> Obviously, it's the same deer I refer to when my wife insists on something.
> The green deer is a "yes deer." *It can be whatever color the troll wants it
> to be.
>
> --
> Peter

It's not here to reason with you, or even argue or debate. Facts mean
nothing to it.

It is only here to draw attention to itself, and tick people off.
Better to not feed it.

"Paul Furman" <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote in message
news: ...
> otter wrote:
>> On Aug 2, 5:06 am, "Peter"<peter...@nospamoptonline.net> wrote:
>>> "Paul Furman"<pa...@-edgehill.net> wrote in message
>>> news: ...
>>>
>>>
>>>> I combined those two for your recipe...
>>>
>>> Paul, I don't understand why you take it seriously.
>>>
>> Better to not feed it.
>
> Yeah, I know - hard to resist though once in a while.
>


Done that myself. Every so often we get the urge to play with something at a
very low level.

--
Peter

Paul Furman <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote:
> ? wrote:
> > Ask me if I give a ****. I also used to tend bar in a rowdy biker-bar for a
> > few years. I'm also an excellent marksman with both rifle and compound bow
> > (crossbow too, but those are so easy it shouldn't count).
>
> I am a dynamic figure, often seen scaling walls and crushing ice.
[...]
Master class in bullshit boasting.

Hats off.

--
Andy Templeman <http://www.templeman.org.uk/>

On Aug 2, 4:08*am, Paul Furman <pa...@-edgehill.net> wrote:
> Superzooms Still Win wrote:
> > On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 04:37:40 -0400, "Tim Conway"<tconway_...@comcast.net>
> > wrote:
>
> >> "Superzooms Still Win"<s...@noaddress.org> *wrote in message
> >>news:. ..
> >>> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 01:05:55 -0400, "Tim Conway"<tconway_...@comcast.net>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>> And the leaves aren't blue.
>
> >>> RGB samples:
> >>> 11,134,118
> >>> 11,107,85
>
> >>> Green, Blue
>
> >>> 134,118
>
> >>> 107,85
>
> >>> That's about a blue as you can get for any shade of green and still try to
> >>> call it green. If both values were equal then it'd be a shade of pure
> >>> cyan.
> >>> Get your monitor adjusted, or something. I suspect the problem might be
> >>> what's looking at your monitor, considering you can't even determine
> >>> horse-**** compositions and underexposure too.
>
> >> You talk pretty big for someone sitting behind a keyboard. *If you'd say
> >> those things in person to some of the people in neighborhoods that I've been
> >> in you'd wind up shot - to say the least.
>
> >> Take it as a warning. *Other people might not be so patient with you as
> >> those in these newsgroups.
>
> > Trolling off-topic again?
>
> > Ask me if I give a ****. I also used to tend bar in a rowdy biker-bar for a
> > few years. I'm also an excellent marksman with both rifle and compound bow
> > (crossbow too, but those are so easy it shouldn't count).
>
> I am a dynamic figure, often seen scaling walls and crushing ice. I have
> been known to remodel train stations on my lunch breaks, making them
> more efficient in the area of heat retention. I translate ethnic slurs
> for Cuban refugees, I write award-winning operas, I manage time
> efficiently. Occasionally, I tread water for three days in a row.
>
> I woo women with my sensuous and godlike trombone playing, I can pilot
> bicycles up severe inclines with unflagging speed, and I cook
> Thirty-Minute Brownies in twenty minutes. I am an expert in stucco, a
> veteran in love, and an outlaw in Peru.
>
> Using only a hoe and a large glass of water, I once single-handedly
> defended a small village in the Amazon Basin from a horde of ferocious
> army ants. I play bluegrass cello, I was scouted by the Mets, I am the
> subject of numerous documentaries. When I'm bored, I build large
> suspension bridges in my yard. I enjoy urban hang gliding. On
> Wednesdays, after school, I repair electrical appliances free of charge.
>
> I am an abstract artist, a concrete analyst, and a ruthless bookie.
> Critics worldwide swoon over my original line of corduroy evening wear.
> I don't perspire. I am a private citizen, yet I receive fan mail. I have
> been caller number nine and have won the weekend passes. Last summer I
> toured New Jersey with a traveling centrifugal-force demonstration. I
> bat .400. My deft floral arrangements have earned me fame in
> international botany circles. Children trust me.
>
> I can hurl tennis rackets at small moving objects with deadly accuracy.
> I once read Paradise Lost, Moby Dick, and David Copperfield in one day
> and still had time to refurbish an entire dining room that evening. I
> know the exact location of every food item in the supermarket. I have
> performed several covert operations for the CIA. I sleep once a week;
> when I do sleep, I sleep in a chair. While on vacation in Canada, I
> successfully negotiated with a group of terrorists who had seized a
> small bakery. The laws of physics do not apply to me.
>
> I balance, I weave, I dodge, I frolic, and my bills are all paid. On
> weekends, to let off steam, I participate in full-contact origami. Years
> ago I discovered the meaning of life but forgot to write it down. I have
> made extraordinary four course meals using only a mouli and a toaster
> oven. I breed prizewinning clams. I have won bullfights in San Juan,
> cliff-diving competitions in Sri Lanka, and spelling bees at the
> Kremlin. I have played Hamlet, I have performed open-heart surgery, and
> I have spoken with Elvis.

Quality bullshit. I have enjoyed it.

DanP

"Superzooms Still Win" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 07:07:51 -0700 (PDT), otter <>
> wrote:
>
>>On Aug 2, 5:06 am, "Peter" <peter...@nospamoptonline.net> wrote:
>>> "Paul Furman" <pa...@-edgehill.net> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news: ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > 1.2x green shown. It looks awful.
>>>
>>> >> and -30% blue is just about right.
>>>
>>> > .83x blue show, as I suggested, if anything.
>>>
>>> > I combined those two for your recipe...
>>>
>>> Paul, I don't understand why you take it seriously.
>>>
>>> Obviously, it's the same deer I refer to when my wife insists on
>>> something.
>>> The green deer is a "yes deer." It can be whatever color the troll wants
>>> it
>>> to be.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Peter
>>
>>It's not here to reason with you, or even argue or debate. Facts mean
>>nothing to it.
>>
>>It is only here to draw attention to itself, and tick people off.
>>Better to not feed it.
>
> Considering I have proved the Furman Troll wrong at every turn, you're
> right, it's just here desperately seeking attention. I'll not bother
> trying
> to correct its errors so much. It posts bullshit hoping someone will come
> along to slap its silly face. Far too tedious just for all that attention
> it wants.
>
Speak for yourself.

On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:10:23 -0500, SneakyP the pretend-photographer troll
<> wrote:

>"Tim Conway" <> wrote in
>news:i32vbk$n2k$:
>
>>
>> "Superzooms Still Win" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:30:23 -0400, "Tim Conway"
>>> <> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Larry Thong" <> wrote in message
>>>>news8GdnRoVeqeTR8nRnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d@supernew s.com...
>>>>> Well, maybe just a little spotty.
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Spots.jpg>
>>>>>
>>>>Nice shot. Just needs a catchlight in the eyes.
>>>
>>> Blue foliage, red fur, someone sorely needs a camera, monitor, or
>>> eyes adjusted. Did anyone mention the worthless underexposed
>>> composition yet? Interesting that the leaves in front are more in
>>> focus than the deer. Looks
>>> like its just as much of a problem with camera and lenses as it is
>>> the snapshooter.
>>>
>>> <http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4109/4847902759_058421b547_b.jpg>
>>
>> No. Rita's is better by far. And the leaves aren't blue.
>>
>
>What I see is a chickenshit loser troll who can't keep his pictures
>copyrighted, and paranoia confirms this troll's diagnosis with the
>website's "This Photo Is Currently Unavailable" blurb. Probably doesn't
>last longer than a few minutes.
>
>two minutes it's there, then it's not.

It was up for over 24 hours. Did you miss it? Awww.... too bad. Poor little
you. Like you missed the fact that someone's monitor phase problem will not
appear in a JPG edited on that monitor too?

LOL!

You got TROLLED by one of your fellow pretend-photographer TROLLS.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!

Try again you pathetic pretend-photographer TROLL.

LOL!