Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > C Programming > Re: Emacs Lisp's Library System (tutorial)

Thread Tools

Re: Emacs Lisp's Library System (tutorial)

Rivka Miller
Posts: n/a
The first thing to understand elisp is to have the code of the elisp
interpreter in elisp. I dont think that probably is published. You
still have the choice of reading the C code which I referred to in an
earlier post in comp.lang.c.

Maybe you can expand on this topic.

DEFUN ("or", For, Sor, 0, UNEVALLED, 0,
doc: /* Eval args until one of them yields non-nil, then return
value. The remaining args are not evalled at all.
If all args return nil, return nil.
usage: (or CONDITIONS ...) */)
Lisp_Object args;
register Lisp_Object val = Qnil;
struct gcpro gcpro1;

GCPRO1 (args);

while (CONSP (args))
val = Feval (XCAR (args));
if (!NILP (val))
args = XCDR (args);

return val;

On Jul 13, 5:44*pm, Xah Lee <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> • Emacs Lisp's Library System
> *
> plain text version follows
> --------------------------------------------------
> Emacs Lisp's Library System
> Xah Lee, 2010-07-13
> This page explains emacs library system. For example, what's the
> difference between library, package, features? And what's the
> difference between load-file, load, require, autoload?
> --------------------------------------------------
> What's Library, Package, Feature?
> ==============================
> No Namespace
> Emacs lisp the language does not have name spaces. Everything is
> global, with dynamic scope, with some shadowing mechanism. So, don't
> expect library or module to be language defined name space constructs
> that somewhat enforce name space and file name relation, as in Perl,
> Python, Java.
> ==============================
> What's the difference between a Package and Library?
> The terms “package” and “library”, are used losely in emacs/elisp
> manual to refer to any useful elisp file. They are not technical
> definitions in elisp.
> A “library” usually refers to elisp file containing library of lisp
> functions, to be called by other lisp source code. For example, the
> command backward-word is defined in “simple.el”, which is a library of
> functions.
> A “package” usually refers to something useful for emacs users, like a
> major mode or minor mode. The term “module” is not used by emacs.
> ==============================
> Emacs's Concept of “Feature”
> The term “feature” has some meaning in elisp, but is not mechanical. A
> “feature” is a elisp symbol, that is intended to represent the
> functionality provided by a emacs package. This elisp symbol, can be
> placed on the predefined global variable named “features”, which is a
> list of symbols. For example, here's part of the value of “features”
> when i do “Ctrl+x describe-variable Enter features”:
> ibuffer etags ring cc-mode cc-fonts cc-menus cc-cmds cc-styles
> cc-align cc-engine cc-vars cc-defs xlsl-mode encoded-kb speck
> sgml-mode dired info newcomment desktop recentf tree-widget wid-edit
> advice help-fns ...
> A elisp file can call “(provide ‹some symbol›)” near the end, which
> adds that symbol to the “features” list. The purpose of features and
> the “features” variable is to provide a way for emacs to know if
> something is already loaded.
> --------------------------------------------------
> Package/Library/Feature are not Managed
> There is no absolute relation between any concept of package/library/
> feature/autoload facilities and the file name.
> By convention, if a elisp file name is “xyz-mode.el”, it OFTEN
> provides a lisp symbol “xyz-mode” as its feature name (it may not),
> and the function to invoke the mode is OFTEN named “xyz-mode”.
> Sometimes the “mode” part is dropped in the file name, feature symbol,
> or function name.
> This is only a lose convention. There are a lot exceptions in many
> bundled emacs packages. For example, the file “lisp-mode.el” provides
> the symbol “lisp-mode” as feature, and is invoked by “emacs-lisp-
> mode”. The “cua-base.el” file provides symbols “cua-base” and “cua” as
> features, and is invoked by cua-mode. The “text-mode.el” file does not
> provide any symbol for feature, but is a quite useful mode invoked by
> text-mode. The file “desktop.el” provides “desktop” as feature, and is
> invoked by desktop-save-mode.
> --------------------------------------------------
> File/Package Loading Mechanisms
> [table]
> Emacs's library/module/package is a primitive system, centered on
> loading file (load-file), with some slightly high level things such as
> its “features”, “autoload”, “require”. However, nothing is strict or
> enforced by elisp.
> Function Name * Purpose Tech Detail * * Comment
> load-file * * * Load a file. * *Load one specific file. Use this if you have
> one very SPECIFIC file at one particular file path.
> load * *Load a file. * *Load a file by searching thru var “load-path”. Also,
> tries to load a compiled version (.elc) if exists. * * *Use this if there
> are several possible location for the file, and you are using a short
> file name such as “undo.el” or “undo”, and you want to load the
> compiled version if it exists (“undo.elc”).
> require Load a package if it has not already been loaded. * * * Checks the
> var “features”, if symbol is not there, then call “load” to load it.
> Best used in elisp source code, similar to other lang's “require” or
> “import”.
> autoload * * * *Load a file only when a function is called. * * Associate a
> function name with a file path. When the function is called, load the
> file, and execute the function. It is good to use this when you
> install a package. It save startup time and makes emacs use less
> system resource.
> All the above means, you could have a file named “xyz.el”, which
> provides a feature named “abc”, while it really just provide a mode to
> user with the command name “opq-mode” or sometimes just “opq”, and it
> might be displayed in mode line as “OPQ”, “OPQ helper”, or anything
> else. And, this file can be considered as a package as well as
> library.
> See also: How To Name Your Emacs Major Mode.
> --------------------------------------------------
> Isn't this all very bad?
> Yes it is.
> Though, it's just the state of software. Many most popular langs, such
> as C, C++, PHP, do worse. They don't have a module system neither, but
> worse, they load a file by “include”. Note that even Scheme didn't
> have module system, until R6RS, released in 2007, and the new module
> system defined in it widely criticized, and R6RS caused Scheme
> community to split.
> * Xah
> ∑
> ☄

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trouble running Emacs-EPL (to run perl in emacs). Adam Funk Perl Misc 4 01-29-2007 10:42 AM
System.Security.SecurityException: Error de solicitud de permiso de tipo System.Net.WebPermission, System, Version=1.0.5000.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089. Luis Esteban Valencia ASP .Net 0 07-14-2005 01:43 PM
Re: Difference between Web Control Library and Class Library Alan Ferrandiz [MCT] ASP .Net 0 09-11-2004 01:51 PM
Re: Difference between Web Control Library and Class Library Mythran ASP .Net 0 08-24-2004 05:53 PM
Library in library... Sweep C++ 1 12-09-2003 04:12 AM