«

Hello:

I took this phorot of this species, I could not put the amphibious on
another surface, but I also find interesting contrast:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4721550917/

Thanks for your technical comments about photography.

--
MMYV
http://www.mmyv.com

"mmyvusenet" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Hello:
>
> I took this phorot of this species, I could not put the amphibious on
> another surface, but I also find interesting contrast:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4721550917/
>
> Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
>
Good photo. I like your view of him.

On Jun 23, 1:11*pm, "mmyvusenet" <mmyvuse...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I took this phorot of this species, I could not put the amphibious on
> another surface, but I also find interesting contrast:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4721550917/
>
> Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
>
> --
> MMYVhttp://www.mmyv.com

I just want to know how did you get it to SMILE

On 2010-06-23 20:04:48 +0100, Tim Conway said:

> "mmyvusenet" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> Hello:
>>
>> I took this phorot of this species, I could not put the amphibious on
>> another surface, but I also find interesting contrast:
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4721550917/
>>
>> Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
>>
> Good photo. I like your view of him.

I like the cheeky smile. A friend/pet instead of just an animal.

--
Pete

Ï "mmyvusenet" <> Ýãñáøå óôï ìÞíõìá
news:...
> Hello:
>
> I took this phorot of this species, I could not put the amphibious on
> another surface, but I also find interesting contrast:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4721550917/
>
> Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
>
> --
Very nice...smile, but I thought that turtles were reptiles, no? But still,
they make good pets...



--
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios
major in electrical engineering
mechanized infantry reservist
hordad AT otenet DOT gr

"George Kerby" <> escribió en el mensaje de
noticias:C847FB6D.48DAE%.. .
>
>
>
> On 6/23/10 4:27 PM, in article ,
> "Bowser" <> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:26:03 -0500, George Kerby
>> <> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/23/10 1:11 PM, in article ,
>>> "mmyvusenet"
>>> <> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello:
>>>>
>>>> I took this phorot of this species, I could not put the amphibious on
>>>> another surface, but I also find interesting contrast:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4721550917/
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> MMYV
>>>> http://www.mmyv.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>> How the hell does it get that thing into it's shell?!?
>>>
>>> That head is bigger than the current POTUS...
>>
>> Not if you include the ears.
>
> <BFG!>


Hello:

This species sometimes inflated the head, like frogs, and that I think is
one reason for what is mentioned as well.

--
MMYV
http://www.mmyv.com

"ransley" <> escribió en el mensaje de
noticias:927546e3-6df7-40f5-9a71-...
> On Jun 23, 1:11 pm, "mmyvusenet" <mmyvuse...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> Hello:
>>
>> I took this phorot of this species, I could not put the amphibious on
>> another surface, but I also find interesting contrast:
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4721550917/
>>
>> Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
>>
>> --
>> MMYVhttp://www.mmyv.com
>
> I just want to know how did you get it to SMILE


I think it could be the intersection between the feeling of the person who
wants to show an interesting photo, and the feeling of the animal to look
good in the photo.

--
MMYV
http://www.mmyv.com

"Tzortzakakis Dimitris" <> escribió en el mensaje de
noticias:i02m21$o2j$...
>
> Ï "mmyvusenet" <> Ýãñáøå óôï ìÞíõìá
> news:...
>> Hello:
>>
>> I took this phorot of this species, I could not put the amphibious on
>> another surface, but I also find interesting contrast:
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4721550917/
>>
>> Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
>>
>> --
> Very nice...smile, but I thought that turtles were reptiles, no? But
> still, they make good pets...


Yes, and there are two styles, tortoises, and amphibious.

--
MMYV
http://www.mmyv.com

"Tim Conway" <> escribió en el mensaje de
noticias:hvtlsh$ac3$...
>
> "mmyvusenet" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> Hello:
>>
>> I took this phorot of this species, I could not put the amphibious on
>> another surface, but I also find interesting contrast:
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4721550917/
>>
>> Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
>>
> Good photo. I like your view of him.


Hello, thanks for your comment, I am now posting about the turtle in another
environment.

--
MMYV
http://www.mmyv.com

mmyvusenet wrote:
>
> "Tzortzakakis Dimitris" <> escribió en el mensaje de
> noticias:i02m21$o2j$...
> >
> > Ï "mmyvusenet" <> Ýãñáøå óôï ìÞíõìá
> > news:...
> >> Hello:
> >>
> >> I took this phorot of this species, I could not put the amphibious on
> >> another surface, but I also find interesting contrast:
> >>
> >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4721550917/
> >>
> >> Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
> >>
> >> --
> > Very nice...smile, but I thought that turtles were reptiles, no? But
> > still, they make good pets...
>
> Yes, and there are two styles, tortoises, and amphibious.


In reality, "amphibians" are a separate class within the animal kingdom.
Unlike reptiles, they lack scales and their young go through a "tadpole"
stage, before reaching maturity.

These tadpoles contain gills, and most species lose them when undergoing
"metamorphosis" into adulthood. Then, they become air-breathers and rely
solely on their newly developed lungs.

Therefore, tortoises and turtles aren't literally amphibians (they're
reptiles).

However, I understand the point you were trying to make: Turtles spend
a lot of their time in the water (and >need< to do so, incidentally),
whereas tortoises are strictly land-based beasts.

(This free lesson in "natural history" is now concluded, Miguel!)

--
Cordially,
John Turco <>

Marie's Musings <http://fairiesandtails.blogspot.com>