? "scott nalter" <> ?????? ??? ??????
news:...
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:59:10 +0300, "Tzortzakakis Dimitris"
> <> wrote:
>
>>
>>? "Robert Coe" <> ?????? ??? ??????
>>news:. ..
>>> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:23:32 +0300, "Tzortzakakis Dimitris"
>>> <>
>>> wrote:
>>> :
>>> : ? "Doug McDonald" <> ?????? ??? ??????
>>> : news:hvbeui$ddv$...
>>> : > I've decided I need a new inkjet printer.
>>> : >
>>> : > My current Ep$on Photo Stylus 820 ink eater still works and,
>>> : > except for one point, makes nice prints. But that one point
>>> : > is driving me crazy.
>>> : >
>>> : > The problem is that using Epson's top grade glossy paper,
>>> : > it does not print real black. No where near the density of
>>> : > a genuine ordinary chromogenic old-fashioned wet process color
>>> print.
>>> : >
>>> : > What's the current state in printers for low-volume use? I'm
>>> interested in
>>> : > the 8-inch wide ones or the next width step up (11 inches? 14?).
>>> : Canon Pixma iP 4500 (IIRC the current model, I have the 4300).
>>> : 5 separate inks (Cyan,Magenta, Yellow, Photo Black, Document Black).
>>> : Optimum ink cost, because the tanks are, well, tanks and head is
>>> available
>>> : separately (running smoothly after 3+ years and hundreds of printouts)
>>> : Prints on printable cds and vds.
>>> : Has a paper tray (better model has 2 trays IIRC) so you don't have to
>>> : manually feed paper.
>>> : A4 (letter) size.
>>> : Prints on both sides of paper automatically (flips it).
>>> : Price ~120 euros, ink tank ~14 euros (I use generic paper and have the
>>> tanks
>>> : refilled with generic ink, excellent results-prints only smudge a
>>> bit).
>>>
>>> I was with you until that last line. How could it possibly be acceptable
>>> for
>>> the prints to smudge at all?
>>If you count the economic benefit of having the tanks refilled for 4
>>euros,
>>when an original tank costs 16 euros... That's four for the price of one!
>>We
>>accept smudged photos, FWIW, and BTW, it's greener to use the same
>>cartridge again, instead of throwing it away, and buying a new one, and
>>throwing away again all packaging material.
>
> Smudging depends more on the paper used than the inks used. If the surface
> cannot adequately trap the ink then you'll get smudging. Any half-decent
> paper today will absorb, trap, and stabilize both pigment and dye inks.
> Perhaps you are using pigment inks on a dye-inks-only paper, or
> vice-versa.
I got best results with Canon paper, and Canon inks, obviously, but Canon
"everyday" papers go for 10 euros per 100@4X5", and Canon inks go for 16
euros a tank (these inks are supposed to be guaranteed for 100 years). On
the contrary, generic paper from lidl
www.lidl.co.uk goes for 4 euros per
100, and my tanks refilled with generic ink and the chip resetted with a
chip resetter, 4 euros per tank. So, if we take the worst scenario, that all
3 tanks need refilling for 100 prints (C-M-Y), it's 4 euros for paper plus
12 euros for refilling all 3 tanks, 16 euros so 16 cents per print. This is
cheaper than most local photofinishig labs. ( I obviously go to the greek
lidl,
www.lidl.gr , but I don't think that anybody else speaks greek here).
--
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios
major in electrical engineering
mechanized infantry reservist
hordad AT otenet DOT gr